رفتار حرکتی

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

هزینه های دریافت نشریه

راهنمای نویسندگان

فرم ها

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اعتباریابی نسخة فارسی مقیاس لذت فعالیت بدنی در کودکان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار رفتار حرکتی، دانشگاه صنعتی شاهرود

2 استادیار رفتار حرکتی، دانشگاه سمنان

3 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه پیام نور تهران مرکز

چکیده

هدف از پژوهش حاضر، تعیین روایی و پایایی نسخة فارسی مقیاس لذت فعالیت بدنی در کودکان بود. بدین‌منظور 564 کودک از بازة سنی 10 تا 12 سال به‌صورت تصادفی خوشه‎ای انتخاب شدند و نسخۀ فارسی مقیاس لذت فعالیت بدنی را تکمیل کردند. روش اجرا بدین شکل بود که ابتدا با استفاده از روش باز ترجمه، صحت ترجمة نسخة فارسی پرسش‌نامه تأیید شد و درادامه برای تعیین روایی سازة پرسش‌نامه از تحلیل عامل تأییدی مبتنی بر مدل‎یابی معادلات ساختاری، برای تعیین همسانی درونی از ضریب آلفای کرونباخ و برای پایایی زمانی سؤالات، از همبستگی درون طبقه‏ای در روش آزمون ـ آزمون مجدد استفاده شد. نتایج پژوهش نشان‌دهندة برازش مطلوب مدل نسخة فارسی مقیاس لذت فعالیت بدنی است. شاخص‏های برازندگی رمزی 05/0، سی.اف.آی 92/0 و ان.ان.اف.آی 9/0 بود؛ همچنین، ضریب آلفای کرونباخ با 83/0 و ضریب همبستگی درون‌طبقه‎ای با 80/0 از مقادیر قابل‌قبولی برخوردار بودند. یافته‏ها همچنین از ساختار تک‌عاملی و 16 سؤالی مقیاس اصلی حمایت می‏کند. بنابراین، نسخة فارسی مقیاس لذت فعالیت بدنی از روایی سازه و پایایی درونی و زمانی قابل‌قبولی در بین کودکان 10 تا 12 سال برخوردار است و می‏توان از آن به‌عنوان ابزاری روا و پایا برای ارزیابی لذت فعالیت بدنی کودکان ایرانی استفاده کرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Validation of the Persian version of Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale in Children

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mansooreh Mokaberian 1
  • Valiollah Kashani 2
  • Fatemeh Sedighi Faroji 3

1 Assistant Professor of Motor Behavior, Shahrood University of Technology

2 Assistant Professor of Motor Behavior, University of Semnan

3 Ph.D. Student of Sport Management, University of Payam Noor Tehran Center branch

چکیده [English]

The enjoyment of physical activity is defined as a positive affective state, either cognitive or physiological, that involves feelings of pleasure and fun associated with the completion of or performance in physical activities. The purpose of this study was determining validity and reliability of the Persian version of Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale in Children. For this purpose, 564 children ranging in age from 10 to 12 years were chosen by random Cluster sampling and completed the Persian version of Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale. The method of the research was as follows: first, with use of translation-back translation methods, translate accuracy of Persian version of questionnaires were confirmed. Confirmatory factor analysis based on structural equations was used for validation of structure of questionnaire, Cronbach alpha coefficient was used for internal consistency of questionnaire, and intra-class correlation coefficient under test-retest method was used to study temporal reliability of items. The results showed that the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale had acceptable fit index (RMSEA=0.05, CFI=0.92, NNFI=0.90), internal consistency (0.83), and temporal reliability (0.80), indicating good validity and reliability of the Persian version of Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale. Also, the results supported 1-factor and 16-item structure of the initial of scale. Therefore, The Persian version of the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale can be characterized as a valid and reliable tool to evaluate the Enjoyment of Physical Activity in Iranian Children.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Enjoyment of Physical Activity
  • Children
  • Factorial Validity
  • Internal Consistency
  • Temporal reliability
مراجع
  1. C. B Ebbeling, al e. Childhood obesity: publichealth crisis, common sense cure. Lancet. 2002; 360: 473–82.
  2. Organisation WH. Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organisation; 2003.
  3. Remmers T, Sleddens E, Gubbels J, al e. Relationship between physical activity and the development of BMI in children. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014;46(1):177–84.
  4. Wankel L. The importance of enjoyment to adherence and psychological benefits from physical activity. Int J Sport Psychol. 1993;24:151–69.
  5. Brown W, Burton N, Rowan P. Updating the evidence on physical activity and health in women. Am J Prev Med 2007;33(5):404-11.
  6. Dobbins M, Corby KD, Robeson P, Husson H, Tirilis D. School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6-18. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;1:CD007651.
  7. Biddle S, Gorely T, Stensel D. Health-enhancing physical activity and sedentary behaviour in children and teenagers. J Sports Sci. 2004;22:679–701.
  8. Kohl H, Hobbs K. Development of physical activity behavirs among children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 1998;101:549–54.
  9. DiLorenzo TM, Stucky-Ropp RC, Wal JSV, Gotham HJ. Determinants of exercise among children. II. A longitudinal analysis. Preventive Medicine. 1998;27(3):        470–7.
  10. Gao Z, Zhang P, Podlog L. Examining elementary school children’s level of enjoyment of traditional tag games vs. interactive dance games. Psychol Health Med. 2013;19(5):605-13.
  11. Hagger M, Chatzisarantis N, Champaign I. Intrinsic motivation and selfdetermination in exercise and sport. Human Kinetics. 2007.
  12. Remmers T, Sleddens EFC, Kremers SPJ, Thijs C. Moderators of the Relationship Between Physical Activity Enjoyment and Physical Activity in Children. Journal of Physical Activity and Health. 2015;12:1066 -73.
  13. Scanlan T, Stein G, Ravizza K. An in-depth study of former elite figure skaters: II. Sources of enjoyment. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 1998;11(1):65-83.
  14. Hales D. Factor validity, invariance, and comparison of several measures of physical activity enjoyment. Georgia: The University of Georgia; 2005.
  15. Boddy L, Murphy M, Cunningham C, al e. Physical activity, cardiorespiratory fitness, and clustered cardiometabolic risk in 10- to 12 -year-old school children: the REACH Y6 study. Am J Hum Biol. 2014;26(4):446-51.
  16. Gao Z, Newton M, Carson R. Students’ motivation, physical activity levels, and health- related physical fitness in fitness class. Middle Grades Research Journal. 2008; (4)3: 21-39.
  17. Frömel v, Formánková S, Sallis J. Physical activity and sport preferences of 10 to 14 year old children: A 5 year prospective study. Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis Gymnica. 2002; 32(1):11–6.
  18. Coulter M, Woods C. An exploration of children’s perceptions and enjoyment of school-based physical activity and physical education. J Phys Act Health. 2011;8(5):645-54.
  19. Gao Z, Zhang T, Stodden D. Children’s physical activity levels and psychological correlates in interactive dance versus aerobic dance. J Sport Health Sci. 2013;2(3):146-51.
  20. Kendzierski D, DeCarlo KJ. Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale: Two validation studies. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology. 1991;13(1):50–64.
  21. Crocker PRE, Bouffard M, Gessaroli ME. Measuring enjoyment in youth sport settings: Aconfirmatory factor analysis of the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale. Journal of Sport & Exercise. 1995;17(2):200-5.
  22. Marsh HW. Positive and negative global self-esteem: A substantively meaningful distinction or artifactors? . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1996;70(4):810–9.
  23. Motl RW, R. K Dishman, Saunders R, Dowda M, Felton G, Pate RR. Measuring enjoyment of physical activity in adolescent girls. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2001; 21(2):110-7.
  24. Moore JB, Yin Z, Hanes J, Duda J, Gutin B, Barbeau P. Measuring Enjoyment of Physical Activity in Children: Validation of the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. 2009; 21(1): 29-116.
  25. Civita MD, D Regier, Alamgir AH, A. H Anis, FitzGerald MJ, Marra CA. Evaluating Health-Related Quality-of-Life Studies in Paediatric Populations: Some Conceptual, Methodological and Developmental Considerations andRecentApplications. PharmacoEconomics. 2005; 23(7):659-85.
  26. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46(12):1417-32.
  27. Hu L, & Bentler, P.M. Cut off Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling, 6, 1-Cut off Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling. 1999;1-55:6.
  28. Schutz R, Gessaroli M. Use, misuse, and disuse of statistics in psychology research. Handbook of research on sport psychology. 1993:901-21.
  29. Terry PC, Lane AM, Fogarty GJ. Construct validity of the Profile of Mood States- Adolescents for use with adults. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2003; 4(2):       125-39.
  30. Hashim HA, Zulkifli EZ, Yusof HA. Factorial validation of Malaysian adapted Brunel Mood Scale in an adolescent sample. Asian journal of sports medicine. 2010 Dec 1;1(4):185.
  31. Zeidabadi R, Rezaie F, Motashareie E. Psychometric properties and normalization of Persian version of Ottawa Mental Skills Assessment Tools (OMSAT-3). Sport Psychology Review. 2014; 3(7): 63-82. (In Persian)
  32. Schutz R, Gessaroli M, Singer R. Use, misuse, and disuse of psychometrics in sport psychology research. Handbook of research on sport psychology. 1993:901-17.
  33. Kline P. Principles and practice of structural equation modelling. 1st ed. New York: The Guildford Press; 2005. 201.
  34. Meyers L S, Gamst G, Guarino A J. Applied multivariate research. 1st ed. Design and interpretation: Sage; 2006. 650.
  35. Kelloway EK. Using LISREL for structural equation modeling.A researcher guide .Thousand oaks, CA1998.
  36. Jekauc D, Voelkle M, Wagner MO, Mewes N, Woll A. Reliability, validity, and measurement invariance of the German version of the physical activity enjoyment scale. J Pediatr Psychol. 2013; 38(1):104-15.
  37. Nunnally JC. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.
  38. Eisenmann J. Insight into the causes of the recent secular trend in pediatric obesity: common sense does not always prevail for complex, multi-factorial phenotypes. Prev Med. 2006; 42(5): 329-35.
  39. Kriska A. Physical activity and the prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus: how much for how long. SportsMed. 2000;29(3):147–51.
رفتار حرکتی
دوره 9، شماره 30
زمستان 1396
بهمن 1396
صفحه 17-36
فایل ها
سابقه مقاله
  • تاریخ دریافت: 31 شهریور 1395
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 24 اسفند 1395
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 20 فروردین 1396
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار