نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار رفتار حرکتی، دانشگاه سمنان

2 کارشناسی ارشد رفتار حرکتی، دانشگاه سمنان

چکیده

هدف از پژوهش حاضر، تعیین روایی و پایایی نسخة فارسی مقیاس لذت، خودکارآمدی و حمایت اجتماعی فعالیت جسمانی کودکان بود. بدین‌منظور، 300 کودک ورزشکار (135‌ پسر و 165 ‌دختر)‌ نسخۀ فارسی مقیاس لذت، خودکارآمدی و حمایت اجتماعی فعالیت جسمانی کودکان را‌ تکمیل نمودند. نتایج با استفاده از آمار توصیفی (میانگین و انحراف استاندارد) و آمار استنباطی (تحلیل عاملی تأییدی، آلفای کرونباخ و ضریب هم‌بستگی درون‌طبقه‏ای) مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. نتایج تحلیل عاملی تأییدی حاکی از آن است که میزان شاخص نیکویی برازش و نیکویی برازش تطبیقی بالاتر از (90/0) می‏باشد که در این پرسش‏نامه هر چهار عامل تأیید شده است. علاوه‌براین، نتایج ضریب آلفای کرونباخ و ضریب هم‌بستگی درون‌طبقهای نشان می‌دهد که مقیاس لذت، خودکارآمدی و حمایت اجتماعی فعالیت جسمانی کودکان دارای ثبات پاسخ درونی (0.75<ɑ) و زمانی (0.80<ɑ) مناسبی است؛ بنابراین، نسخۀ فارسی مقیاس لذت، خودکارآمدی و حمایت اجتماعی فعالیت جسمانی کودکان از روایی و پایایی قابل‌قبولی در کودکان ورزشکار ایرانی برخوردار است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Psychometric Characteristics of the Persian Version of «Enjoyment Scale, Self-Efficacy and Social Support of Physical Activity in Children»

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ahmad Nikravan 1
  • Valiollah Kashani 1
  • Zahra Gholi Zadeh 2

1 Assistant Professor of Motor Behavior, Semnan University

2 M.Sc. Student of Motor Behavior, Semnan University

چکیده [English]

The purpose of this research was to determining validity and reliability of the Persian version of enjoyment scale, self-efficacy and social support of physical activity in children questionnaire. For this purpose, 300 children (135 boy and 165 girl) were completed the Persian version of the enjoyment scale, self-efficacy and social support of physical activity in children questionnaire. Results using descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation) and inferential statistics (confirmatory factor analysis, Cronbach's alpha coefficient of intra-class correlation) were examined. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the index of goodness of fit and goodness of fit is comparatively higher than 0.90 in the questionnaire, four in each factor properly verified confirmed. the total internal consistency (0.75) and the total temporal reliability (0.80) has been acceptable values. Therefore, the Persian version of the questionnaire enjoyment scale, self-efficacy and social support of physical activity in children of acceptable reliability and validity in children's Iranian.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Enjoyment
  • Self-Efficacy
  • Social Support
  • Construct Validity
  • Internal Consistency
  1. Eisenmann J C. Physical activity and cardiovascular disease risk factors in children and adolescents: An overview. The Canadian Journal of Cardiology. 2004‌; 20(3): 295-301
  2. Katzmarzyk P T, Ardern C I. Physical activity levels of Canadian children and youth: Current issues and recommendations. Can J Diabetes. 2004; 28: 67-78.
  3. Buckworth J, Dishman R K. Determinants of physical activity: Research to application. Lifestyle Medicine. 1999: 1016-27.
  4. Gyurcsik N C, Spink K S, Bray S R, Chad K, Kwan M. An ecologically based examination of barriers to physical activity in students from grade seven through first-year university. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2006‌; 38(6): 704-11.
  5. Rovniak L S, Anderson E S, Winett R A, Stephens R S. Social cognitive determinants of physical activity in young adults: A prospective structural equation analysis. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2002‌; 24(2): 149-56.
  6. Abdullah A S, Wong C M, Yam H K, Fielding R. Factors related to non-participation in physical activity among the students in Hong Kong. International Journal of Sports Medicine. 2005‌; 26(7): 611-5.
  7. Robbins L B, Pender N J, Kazanis A S. Barriers to physical activity perceived by adolescent girls. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health. 2003‌; 48(3): 206-12.
  8. Tergerson J L, King K A. Do perceived cues, benefits, and barriers to physical activity differ between male and female adolescents? Journal of School Health. 2002‌; 72(9): 374-80.
  9. Myers R S, Roth D L. Perceived benefits of and barriers to exercise and stage of exercise adoption in young adults. Health Psychology. 1997‌; 16(3): 277.
  10. Deforche B I, De Bourdeaudhuij I M, Tanghe A P. Attitude toward physical activity in normal-weight, overweight and obese adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2006‌; 38(5): 560-8.
  11. Nishida Y, Suzuki H, Wang DH, Kira S. Psychological determinants of physical activity in Japanese female employees. Journal of occupational health. 2003;45(1):15-22.
  12. Foley L, Prapavessis H, Maddison R, Burke S, McGowan E, Gillanders L. Predicting physical activity intention and behavior in school-age children. Pediatric Exercise Science. 2008‌‌; 20(3): 342-56.
  13. Pender N‌, Murdaugh C‌, Parsons M. The health promotion model. Health Promotion in Nursing Practice. ‌2002‌; 4: 59-79.
  14. Serap Kurbanoglu S, Akkoyunlu B, Umay A. Developing the information literacy self-efficacy scale. Journal of Documentation. 2006‌; 62(6): 730-43.
  15. Schulz U, Schwarzer R. Long-term effects of spousal support on coping with cancer after surgery. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. 2004‌; 23(5): 716-‌32.
  16. Sarafino E P, Smith T W. Health psychology: Biopsychosocial interactions. John Wiley & Sons; 2014 jan 13‌.
  17. Rozin P. Preadaptation and the puzzles and properties of pleasure. Well-being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology. 1999‌: 109-33. Rozin P. Preadaptation and the puzzles and properties of pleasure. Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. 1999 Jul 8:109-33.
  18. Ward D S‌, Saunders R P‌, ‌Pate R. Physical activity interventions in children and adolescents. Pediatric Exercise Science. ‌2007‌; 19: 493-‌4.
  19. Motl R W, Dishman R K, Saunders R, Dowda M, Felton G, Pate R R. Measuring enjoyment of physical activity in adolescent girls. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2001; 21(2): 110-7.
  20. Liang Y, Lau PW, Huang WY, Maddison R, Baranowski T. Validity and reliability of questionnaires measuring physical activity self-efficacy, enjoyment, social support among Hong Kong Chinese children. Preventive medicine reports. 2014 Dec 31;1:48-52.
  21. Vaez Mousavi S M K. Psychometric evalution of the farsi translation of SASI PSYCH (South Australian Sport Institut Self-Assisment). En.Journals.Sid.Ir. 2001; 23- 32 (In Persion).
  22. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications; 2015.
  23. Hooman H. A. Structural Equation Modeling Using Lisrel Software. Tehran: Samt‌; 2005. (In Persion).
  24. Sallis J F, Grossman R M, Pinski R B, Patterson T L, Nader P R. The development of scales to measure social support for diet and exercise behaviors. Preventive Medicine. 1987‌‌; 16(6): 825-36.
  25. Zeidabadi R, Rezaie F, Motashareie E. Psychometric properties and normalization of Persian version of Ottawa Mental Skills Assessment Tools (OMSAT-3). Sport Psychology Review. 2014‌; 3(7): 63-82. (In Persion).
  26. Browne M W, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sage Focus Editions; 1993 . P. 136-53.
  27. Kelloway E K. Using LISREL for structural equation modeling: A researcher's guide. Sage; 1998‌. Kelloway EK. Using LISREL for structural equation modeling: A researcher's guide. Sage; 1998 May 5.
  28. Martin L J, Carron A V, Eys M A, Loughead T. Validation of the child sport cohesion questionnaire. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science. 2013‌; 17(2): 105-19.