<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Sport Sciences Research Institute</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Motor Behavior</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2538-273X</Issn>
				<Volume>16</Volume>
				<Issue>55</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2024</Year>
					<Month>03</Month>
					<Day>20</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Outcomes of Linear and Non-Linear Pedagogy in Learning Sport and Motor Skills: A Systematic Review</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Outcomes of Linear and Non-Linear Pedagogy in Learning Sport and Motor Skills: A Systematic Review</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>75</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>108</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">4341</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22089/mbj.2022.13464.2050</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mehrab</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mehranmanesh</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Motor Behavior, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0001-8837-3642</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Seyyed Mohammad Kazem</FirstName>
					<LastName>Vaez Mousavi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Physical Education and Sport Science, Imam Hossein University, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-2606-0816</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mohammad Ali</FirstName>
					<LastName>Aslankhani</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Motor Behavior, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0001-6487-8056</Identifier>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2022</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>31</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The purpose of this study was to review the studies conducted in Iran on the learning outcomes of motor and sports skills based on linear and non-linear pedagogy. A systematic review method based on the 2020 edition of the PRISMA statement was adopted for the qualitative synthesis of the literature. The search was conducted using 26 terms from three information sources (Iranian Scientific Journals System, Noor Specialized Journals Database, and Google Scholar) from 2000 to 2022. A total of 2086 records were obtained in the initial search. After assessing the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 26 eligible articles were included in this review. In total, 88% of the studies were conducted in the last five years, in which 1008 individuals participated (41% male). Most of the studies have been conducted in the field of physical education in schools (58%) focused on the instruction of nine types of motor and sport skills and examined physical (80%), cognitive (19%), and affective (42%) outcomes. Except for a few inconsistent studies, in most of the studies, non-linear pedagogies such as student-centered approach, sport education model, cooperative learning, constraint-led approach, and game-centered approaches (i.e., teaching games for understanding, tactical game approach, game sense, play practice, situated game teaching) were more effective in creating positive learning outcomes than linear pedagogies. Based on the findings of this systematic review, methodological considerations and future directions for research on the pedagogy of motor and sports skills are discussed.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The purpose of this study was to review the studies conducted in Iran on the learning outcomes of motor and sports skills based on linear and non-linear pedagogy. A systematic review method based on the 2020 edition of the PRISMA statement was adopted for the qualitative synthesis of the literature. The search was conducted using 26 terms from three information sources (Iranian Scientific Journals System, Noor Specialized Journals Database, and Google Scholar) from 2000 to 2022. A total of 2086 records were obtained in the initial search. After assessing the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 26 eligible articles were included in this review. In total, 88% of the studies were conducted in the last five years, in which 1008 individuals participated (41% male). Most of the studies have been conducted in the field of physical education in schools (58%) focused on the instruction of nine types of motor and sport skills and examined physical (80%), cognitive (19%), and affective (42%) outcomes. Except for a few inconsistent studies, in most of the studies, non-linear pedagogies such as student-centered approach, sport education model, cooperative learning, constraint-led approach, and game-centered approaches (i.e., teaching games for understanding, tactical game approach, game sense, play practice, situated game teaching) were more effective in creating positive learning outcomes than linear pedagogies. Based on the findings of this systematic review, methodological considerations and future directions for research on the pedagogy of motor and sports skills are discussed.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Pedagogy</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Learning Outcomes</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Traditional Teaching</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Model-Based Teaching</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Physical Education</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://mbj.ssrc.ac.ir/article_4341_f291e10ec3263bd7724556d62e70e25d.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
