رفتار حرکتی

تأثیر آموزش خطی و غیرخطی بر خلاقیت فردی و تیمی در فوتسال

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه آزاد

2 گروه رفتار حرکتی، دانشکده تربیت بدنی و علو ورزشی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکز، تهران، ایران

3 دانشکده تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی دانشگاه خوارزمی

چکیده
هدف از این مطالعه مقایسه نقش آموزش خطی و غیرخطی بر خلاقیت تیمی و فردی در فوتسالیست‌های مبتدی بود. در این مطالعه 30 دانشجو از دانشگاه‌ تبریز به روش داوطلبانه شرکت کردند. آزمودنی‌ها در هر یک از گروه‌های خطی و غیرخطی (15 نفر در هر گروه) به‌صورت تصادفی تقسیم شدند و به مدت سه ماه مهارت‌های فوتسال و بازی فوتسال را تمرین کردند. متغیرهای وابسته به روش تحلیل فیلم اندازه‌گیری شدند. نتایج آزمون تحلیل کوواریانس برای اعمال مناسب و نامناسب و آمار توصیفی برای اعمال خلاق و ابداعی و خلاقیت تیمی نشان داد روش غیرخطی بهتر از روش خطی است. این نتایج بر دست‌کاری قیود به‌جای ارائه بازخورد و الگو تأکید دارد و برای مربیان و معلمان کاربرد دارد و توصیه می‌شود این افراد برای به‌کارگیری روش‌های نوین یادگیری آموزش ببینند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

The effect of linear and non-linear training on individual and team creativity in futsal

نویسندگان English

  • human Fahimi 1
  • marzie balali 2
  • Shahab Parvinpour 3
1 Azad university
2 motor behaviour department, faculty of physical education and sport sciences, central tehran branch of islamic azad university, Tehran, Iran
3 Faculty of physical education and sport sciences in Kharazmi university
چکیده English

The aim of this study was to compare the role of linear and nonlinear training on team and individual creativity in beginner futsal players. In this study, 30 students from Tabriz University participated voluntarily. Subjects in each of the linear and nonlinear groups (15 people in each group) were randomly divided and practiced futsal game and futsal skills for three months. Variables dependent on film analysis method were measured. The results of analysis of covariance for appropriate and inappropriate actions and descriptive statistics for creative and original action and team creativity showed that the nonlinear method is better than the linear method. These results emphasize the manipulation of constraints instead of providing feedback and pattern and are applicable to educators and teachers and it is recommended that these people be trained to use new learning methods

کلیدواژه‌ها English

  • motor learning
  • individual creativity
  • team creativity
  • linear method
  • nonlinear method
  1. Magill RA, Anderson DI. Motor learning and control: Concepts and applications. New York McGraw-Hill. 2007;11.
  2. Schmidt RA, Lee T, Winstein C, Wulf G, Zelaznik H. Motor Control and Learning‏. Hum Kinet. 2018;6E.
  3. Benjaminse A, Otten E. ACL injury prevention, more effective with a different way of motor learning?‏ Knee surgery, Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19(4):622–7.
  4. Renshaw, I., Chow, J. Y., Davids, K., & Button C (2015). Nonlinear pedagogy in skill acquisition: An introduction. ‏. Routledge. 2015;
  5. Renshaw I, Davids K, Savelsbergh G. Motor Learning in Practice: A Constraints-led Approach. London: Routledge. 2010;
  6. Runco MA. Creativity theory and themes: Research, development, and practice‏. 2007;
  7. Memmert D. Sports and creativity. Encycl Creat. 2011; 2:373–8.
  8. Memmert D. Tactical creativity in sport. In J. Kaufman, V. Glăveanu, & J. Baer (Eds.). The Cambridge handbook of creativity across domains (pp. 479–491). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2017;
  9. Hristovski R, Davids K, Araujo D, Passos P. Constraints-induced emergence of functional novelty in complex neurobiological systems: A basis for creativity in sport. Nonlinear Dyn Psychol Life Sci. 2011; 15:175–206.
  10. Sternberg RJ, Lubart TI. The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.). Handbook of creativity (pp. 3–15). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. 1999;
  11. Guilford JP. The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill. Isen, A. M. (2000). Positive affect and decision making. In M. Lewis, & J. Haviland-Jones (Eds.). Handbook of emotions (pp. 417–435). (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford. 1967;
  12. Eysenck MW. Principles of cognitive psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 2001;
  13. Orth D, van der Kamp J, Memmert D, Savelsbergh GJ. Creative motor actions as emerging from movement variability. Front Psychol. 2017; 8:1903.
  14. Mohammadi Orangi, B., Yaali, R., Bahram, A., van der Kamp, J., & Aghdasi, M. T. The effects of linear, nonlinear, and differential motor learning methods on the emergence of creative action in individual soccer players. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, (2021). 102009.‏
  15. Memmert D, Hüttermann S, Orliczek J. Decide like Lionel Messi! the impact of regulatory focus on divergent thinking in sports. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2013; 43:2163–2167.
  16. Santos S, Memmert D, Sampaio J, Leite N. The spawns of creative behaviour in team sports: A creativity developmental framework. Front Psychol. 2016; 7:1282.
  17. Santos S, Coutinho D, Gonçalves B, Schöllhorn W, Sampaio J, Leite N. Differential learning as a key training approach to improve creative and tactical behavior in soccer‏. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2018;89(1):11–24.
  18. Hristovski R, Davids K, Passos P, Araujo D. Sport performance as a domain of creative problem solving for self-organizing performer-environment systems. Open Sport Sci J. 2012; 5:26–35.
  19. Santos S, Jiménez S, Sampaio J, Leite N. Effects of the Skills4Genius sports-based training program in creative behavior. PLoS One, 12, e0172520. 2017;
  20. Richard V, Lebeau JC, Becker F, Boiangin N, Tenenbaum G. Developing Cognitive and Motor Creativity in Children Through an Exercise Program Using Nonlinear Pedagogy Principles‏. Creat Res J. 2018;30(44):391–401.
  21. Clemente FM. Study of successful teams on FIFA World Cup 2010 through notational analysis. Pamukkale J Sport Sci. 2012;3(3):90–103.
  22. Kempe M, Vogelbein M, Nopp S. The cream of the crop: Analysing FIFA World Cup 204 and Germany’s title run. J Hum Sport Exerc. 2016;1(11):42–52.
  23. Duarte R, Araújo A, Davids K, Travassos B, Gazimba V, Sampaio J. Interpersonal coordination tendencies shape 1-vs-1 sub-phase performance outcomes in youth soccer. J Sports Sci. 2012;30(9):871–877.
  24. Mohammadi Oranghi B, Yaali R, Bahram A, Aghdasi M. Investigating the role of motor learning strategies on improving team creativity in beginner soccer’s. Mot Behav. 2020; under press.
  25. Mohammadi Oranghi B, Ghadiri F, Aghdasi M, Yaali R. The Effect of Local Indigenous Games on Motor proficiency in Elementary School Boys in Tehran with High and Low Emotional Intelligence. Mot Behav. 2019; under press.
  26. Mohammadi Oranghi B, Aghdasi M, Yaali R. Effect of Aerobic Rhythmic Exercises with Music on Emotional Intelligence and Motor Proficiency in Children with Developmental Coordination Disorder. Mot Behav. 2019;11(36):17–34.
  27. Renshaw I, Chow JY, Davids K, Button C. Nonlinear pedagogy in skill acquisition: An introduction. Routledge; 2015.
  28. Mohammadi Orangi, B, Yaali, R., Bahram, A., Aghdasi, M. T., van der Kamp, J., Vanrenterghem, J., & Jones, P. A. Motor learning methods that induce high practice variability reduce kinematic and kinetic risk factors of non-contact ACL injury. Human Movement Science, (2021). 78, 102805.‏
  29. MOHAMMADI Orangi, B., GHADIRI F, Mohammadnejad M. The Effect of Aerobic Rhythmic Exercise on Anxiety, Motor Skill and Academic Achievement in Boys of Elementary School Children of Tabriz with Development Coordination Disorders. 2019;
  30. Aiken1, Adam C, Post JT, Guy F and P. The effects of self-controlled video feedback on the learning of the basketball set shot. Orig Res Artic. 2012; 1:20–9.
  31. Moy B, Renshaw I, Davids K. The impact of nonlinear pedagogy on physical education teacher education students’ intrinsic motivation. Phys Educ Sport Pedagog. 2016;21(5):517–38.
  32. Caso S, van der Kamp J. Variability and creativity in small-sided conditioned games among elite soccer players. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2020;101645.
  33. Bozkurt S. The Effects of Differential Learning and Traditional Learning Trainings on Technical Development of Football Players. J Educ Train Stud. 2018; 6:25–9.
  34. Santos SD, Memmert D, Sampaio J, Leite N. The spawns of creative behavior in team sports: a creativity developmental framework‏. Front Psychol. 2016; 7:1282.
  35. Schöllhorn WI, Mayer-Kress G, Newell KM, Michelbrink M. Time scales of adaptive behavior and motor learning in the presence of stochastic perturbations. Hum Mov Sci. 2009;28(3):319–33.
  36. Vereijken B, Emmerik REA van, Whiting HTA, Newell KM. Free (z) ing degrees of freedom in skill acquisition. J Mot Behav. 1992;24(1):133–42.
  37. Schöllhorn WI. Applications of systems dynamic principles to technique and strength training. Acta Acad Olympiquae Est. 2000; 8:67–85.
رفتار حرکتی
دوره 13، شماره 45
پاییز1400
مهر 1400
صفحه 159-184

  • تاریخ دریافت 24 فروردین 1400
  • تاریخ بازنگری 18 مهر 1400
  • تاریخ پذیرش 04 آبان 1400

صفحه اصلی

داوران

ارسال مقاله

اصول اخلاقی

اخبار و اعلانات

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

تماس با ما