نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار رفتار حرکتی، پژوهشگاه تربیت‌بدنی و علوم ورزشی

2 استادیار رفتار حرکتی، دانشگاه الزهرا

چکیده

هدف از پژوهش حاضر، بررسی ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی (روایی و پایایی) پرسش‌نامة تصویرسازی ورزشی در ورزشکاران تیم‌های ملی بود. بدین‌منظور، 355 ورزشکار مرد و زن از تیم‌های ملی، نسخة فارسی پرسش‌نامة تصویرسازی ورزشی را تکمیل نمودند؛ این پرسش‌نامه شامل: 30 سؤال و پنج مؤلفۀ تصویرسازی اختصاصی انگیزشی، تصویرسازی تبحر عمومی انگیزشی، تصویرسازی انگیختگی عمومی انگیزشی، تصویرسازی اختصاصی شناختی و تصویرسازی عمومی شناختی می‌باشد. در این پژوهش جهت بررسی روایی سازۀ عاملی از تحلیل عاملی تأییدی مبتنی‌بر مدل معادلات ساختاری استفاده شد‌؛ برای تعیین هم‌سانی درونی، ضریب آلفای کرونباخ به‌کار رفت؛ به‌منظور تعیین پایایی زمانی (با فاصلۀ دو هفته) از ضریب هم‌بستگی درون‌طبقه‌ای بهره گرفته شد. نتایج نشان‌دهندة برازش مطلوب نسخۀ فارسی پرسش‌نامۀ تصویرسازی ورزشی در ورزشکاران تیم‎های ملی (شاخص‌های C.F.I=0.97، T.L.I=0.96، P.G.F.I=0.68 وP.N.F.I=0.72 و RMSEA=0.071) است. همچنین براساس نتایج، هم‌سانی درونی و پایایی زمانی از مقادیر قابل‌قبولی (0.79 تا 0.88) برخوردار می‌باشد؛ بنابراین، نسخۀ فارسی پرسش‌نامۀ تصویرسازی ورزشی از روایی و پایایی قابل‌قبولی در ورزشکاران تیم‎های ملی برخوردار بوده و ورزشکاران، مربیان و پژوهشگران می‌توانند از این پرسش‌نامه استفاده نمایند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Psychometric Properties of Sport Imagery Questionnaire among Iranian National Team’s Athletes

نویسندگان [English]

  • Amir Shams 1
  • Parvaneh Shamsipour Dehkordi 2

1 Assistant Professor of Motor Behavior, Sport Science Research Institute

2 Assistant Professor of Motor Behavior, Alzahra University

چکیده [English]

The purpose of this research was to examine the psychometric properties (validity and reliability) of sport imagery questionnaire among Iranian national team’s athletes. For this purpose, the 355 athletes in Iranian national were selected and completed the Persian version of the sport imagery questionnaire. This questionnaire involved 30 questions and five components such as Motivational Specific (MS) Imagery, Motivational general-mastery (MG-M) imagery, Motivational general-arousal (MG-A) imagery, Cognitive specific (CS) imagery and Cognitive General (CG) function of imagery. Data were analyzed with Confirmatory factorial analysis based on structural equations, Cronbach’s alpha coefficient and intra-class correlation coefficient tests. Result showed that the sport imagery questionnaire has acceptable fit indexes (RMSEA=0.071, CFI=0.97, TLI=0.96, PNFI=0.72, and PGFI=0.68), internal consistency and temporal reliability (0.79-0.88) among Iranian national team’s athletes. Thus, the Persian version of sport imagery questionnaire has acceptable reliability and validity in Iranian national team athletes and coaches, researchers and athletes can use this questionnaire.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Motivational Specific Imagery
  • Motivational General-Mastery Imagery
  • Motivational General-Arousal Imagery
  • Cognitive Specific Imagery
  • Cognitive Genera Imagery
1. Bahramy A. Increase the results of three-point shoot boy’s basketball using the technology of mental exercises (PhD thesis) . Faculty of Sports Psychology, State University of Physical Education and Tourism of the Republic of Belarus; 2007. (In Persian).
2. Bahramy A, Minasian V, Chelongarian N. Standardization attention test in a group of male and female athletes from Iran. Journal of Motor Behavior. 2013, 12; 13-32. (In Persian).
3. Hall C R, Rodgers W M, Wilson P M, Norman P. Imagery use and self-determined motivations in a community sample of exercisers and non-exercisers. Applied Social Psychology. 2010, 40(1): 135–52.
4. Abdoli B, Shams A, Farokhi A. Effect of contextual interference and practice type (observational, physical and mixed) on badminton services. Journal of Research in Motor Behavior. 2013, 1: 67-80.
5. Roosink M, Ziidewind I. Corticospinal excitability during observation and imagery of simple and complex hand tasks: Implications for motor rehabitation. Behavioral Brain Research. 2010, 213(1): 35-41.
6. Schmidt R, Lee D T. Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis. Translated by: R. Hemayat Talab & A. Ghasemi. 1st ed. Tehran: Publications Science and Movement; 2005. (In Persian).
7. Start K B & Richardson A. Kinaesthesis and mental practice. Research Quarterly. 1964; 35: 316-20.
8. Green L B. The use of imagery in the rehabilitation of injured athletes. The Sport Psychologist. 1992, 6(13): 416-28.
9. Williams J, Pearce A, Loporto M, Morris T, Holmes S P. The relationship between corticospinal excitability during motor imagery and motor imagery ability. Behavioral Brain Research. 2012, 15(2): 369-75.
11. Rostami Haji Abadi M, Rahnama N, Sohrabi M, Khayam Bashi Kh, Bambaei Chi E, Mojtahedi H. Determine validity and reliability of Persona version of Vivadness Motor Imagery Questionnaire-2. Olympic Journal. 2012, 54(2): 129-39.
12. Hall C R, Mack D E, Paivio A, Hausenblas H A. Imagery use by athletes: Development of the sport imagery questionnaire. International Journal of Sport Psychology. 1998; 29: 73-89.
13. Hall C R, Stevens D E, Paivio A. Sport imagery questionnaire test manual. Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology Publication. 2005.
14. Watt A P, Jaakkola T T, Morris T. Reliability and factor structure of the Finnish version of the Sport Imagery Questionnaire. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2006; 103: 107-14.
15. Vurgun N, Dorak R F, Ozsaker M. Validity and reliability study of the Sport Imagery Questionnaire for Turkish athletes. International Journal of Academic Research. 2012; 4(6): 32-41.
16. Durand-Bush N, Salmela J H, Green-Demers I. The Ottawa Mental Skills Assessment Tool (OMSAT-3). Sport Psychol., 15: 1-19.
17. Zaid Abadi R, Rezaei F, Motasharei E. Psychometric properties and normalization of Persian Version of Ottawa Mental Skills Assessment Tools (OMSAT-3). Sport Psychology Studies. 2014, 7: 63-82. (In Persian).
18. Vaez Mousavi M. Determine validity and reliability of three questionnaire of mental preparation. Sport Science Research Institute of Iran; 2000. (In Persian).
19. Meyers L S, Gamest G, Garino A J. Functional multivariate research. Translated by: PashSharifi, H., Farzad, V., RezaKhani, R., HasanAbadi, H., Izanloo, B., and Habibi, M. Tehran: Roshd Publication; 2006. (In Persian).
20. Thomas J R, Nelson J K, Silverman S J. Research methods in physical activity. Human Kinetics; 5th edition, 2005.
21. Hu L, Bentler P M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling. 1999; 6: 1–55.
22. Brown T A. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Publications; First Edition, 2006.
23. Homan H A. Analysis of multivariate data in behavioral research. Peyke Farhang Publication; 5th edition, 2008. (In Persian).
24. Terry P C, Lane A M. Normative values for the profile of mood states for use with athletic samples. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. 2000; 12: 93-109.
25. Satorra A, Bentler P. Scaling corrections for Chi-square statistics in covariance structure analysis. Proceedings of the Business and Economic Statistics Section of the American Statistical Association. 1988; p. 308-13.
26. Ruiz M C, Watt A P. Psychometric characteristics of the Spanish Version of the Sport Imagery Questionnaire. Psicothema. 201; 26(2): 267-72.
27. Veraksa D, Gorovaya A, Grushko A, Bayanova L, Melyausha G, Dinara G. Development and reliability of the Russian Version of the Sport Imagery Questionnaire. Anuario de Psicología/ the UB Journal of Psychology. 2014; 44(1): 45-54.
28. Watt A P, Jaakkola T T, Morris T. Reliability and factor structure of the Finnish Version of the Sport Imagery Questionnaire. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2006; 103: 107-14.