Motor Behavior

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

FAQ

Magazine fees received

Guide for Authors

forms

Peer Review Process

The Relative Contribution of Core Executive Functions in Shooting Performance Prediction

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 M.Sc. in Motor Behavior, Faculty of Physical Education & Sport Science, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran

2 Assistant professor of Motor Behavior, Faculty of Physical Education & Sport Science, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran

3 Associate professor of Motor Behavior, Faculty of Physical Education & Sport Science, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran

Abstract

Investigating the underlying factors of sports performance is one of the most important goals of sports science researchers. The present study aimed to investigate the relationship between core executive functions (inhibition and working memory) and shooting performance. For this purpose, 30 shooters from Kurdistan province, aged 18-32 years, trained under the supervision of the province's shooting committee, participated in this study. The working memory and inhibitory control were assessed through the N-Beck and Stroop tests. Then the score in the first official competition of these athletes was considered as shooting performance. Correlation between variables was evaluated by Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficient tests as well as linear regression. The results showed that there was a significant relationship only between the two components of incongruent trials errors and interference score in the Stroop test with shooting performance (p < 0.05) and there was no significant relationship between the other components (P>0.05). Accordingly, the shooting score increased with decreasing errors in incongruent trials as well as reduced interference. In addition, linear regression results showed that only the interference score component was able to estimate part of the variance of shooting performance significantly. Overall, the present findings showed that among the core executive functions (working memory and inhibitory control), the inhibitory control can predict the shooting performance. Therefore, this component can be placed along with other important factors affecting shooter performance to be used first for evaluate and then to improve shooting performance through inhibition enhancement interventions.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References
  1. Jacobson J, Matthaeus L. Athletics and executive functioning: How athletic participation and sport type correlate with cognitive performance. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2014;15(5):521-7.
  2. 2.       Diamond A. Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology. 2013;64:135-68.
  3. 3.       Miyake A, Friedman NP, Emerson MJ, Witzki AH, Howerter A, Wager TD. The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cogn Psychol. 2000;41(1): 100-49.
  4. 4.       Baddeley A. Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003;4(10):829-39.
  5. 5.       Vaughan RS, Laborde S. Attention, working-memory control, working-memory capacity, and sport performance: The moderating role of athletic expertise. Eur J Sport Sci. 2020(just-accepted):1-27.
  6. 6.       Bull R, Espy KA, Wiebe SA. Short-term memory, working memory, and executive functioning in preschoolers: Longitudinal predictors of mathematical achievement at age 7 years. Dev Neuropsychol. 2008;33(3):205-28.
  7. 7.       Vestberg T, Gustafson R, Maurex L, Ingvar M, Petrovic P. Executive functions predict the success of top-soccer players. PloS One. 2012;7(4):e34731.
  8. 8.       Vestberg T, Reinebo G, Maurex L, Ingvar M, Petrovic P. Core executive functions are associated with success in young elite soccer players. PloS One. 2017;12(2), e0170845:1-13.
  9. 9.       Krenn B, Finkenzeller T, Würth S, Amesberger G. Sport type determines differences in executive functions in elite athletes. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2018;38:72-9.
  10. 10.    Hillman CH, Erickson KI, Kramer AF. Be smart, exercise your heart: exercise effects on brain and cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9(1):58-65.
  11. 11.    Alves H, Voss M, Boot WR, Deslandes A, Cossich V, Inacio Salles J, et al. Perceptual-cognitive expertise in elite volleyball players. Front Psychol. 2013;4, 36:1-9.
  12. 12.    Verburgh L, Scherder EJ, van Lange PA, Oosterlaan J. Executive functioning in highly talented soccer players. PloS One. 2014;9(3), e91254: 1-7.
  13. 13.    Sakamoto S, Takeuchi H, Ihara N, Ligao B, Suzukawa K. Possible requirement of executive functions for high performance in soccer. PloS One. 2018;13(8), e0201871:1-11.
  14. 14.    Lundgren T, Högman L, Näslund M, Parling T. Preliminary investigation of executive functions in elite ice hockey players. J Clin Sport Psychol. 2016;10(4):324-35.
  15. 15.    Elferink-Gemser MT, Faber IR, Visscher C, Hung T-M, De Vries SJ, Nijhuis-Van der Sanden MW. Higher-level cognitive functions in Dutch elite and sub-elite table tennis players. PloS One. 2018;13(11), e0206151:1-13.
  16. 16.    Buszard T, Masters RS, Farrow D. The generalizability of working-memory capacity in the sport domain. Curr Opin Psychol. 2017;16:54-7.
  17. 17.    Memmert D, Simons DJ, Grimme T. The relationship between visual attention and expertise in sports. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2009;10(1):146-51.
  18. 18.    Brewer GA, Ball BH, Ware JM. Individual differences in working memory capacity and shooting behavior. J Appl Res Mem Cogn. 2016;5(2):185-91.
  19. 19.    Ishihara T, Kuroda Y, Mizuno M. Competitive achievement may be predicted by executive functions in junior tennis players: An 18-month follow-up study. J Sports Sci. 2019;37(7):755-61.
  20. 20.    Scharfen H-E, Memmert D. The relationship between cognitive functions and sport-specific motor skills in elite youth soccer players. Front Psychol. 2019;10,817: 1-10.
  21. 21.    Laurin R, Finez L. Working memory capacity does not always promote dual‐task motor performance: The case of juggling in soccer. Scand J Psychol. 2020;61(2):168-76.
  22. 22.    Furley P, Wood G. Working memory, attentional control, and expertise in sports: A review of current literature and directions for future research. J Appl Res Mem Cogn. 2016;5(4):415-25.
  23. 23.    Ihalainen S, Kuitunen S, Mononen K, Linnamo V. Determinants of elite‐level air rifle shooting performance. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2016;26(3):266-74.
  24. 24.    ISSF GENERAL REGULATIONS: International Shooting Sport Federation. 2020. Available at: www.issf-sports.org [cited 2020 Sep 21].
  25. 25.    Gorfein DS, MacLeod CM. Inhibition in cognition: American Psychological Association Washington, DC; 2007. p. 68-69.
  26. León-Domínguez U, Martín-Rodríguez JF, León-Carrión J. Executive n-back tasks for the neuropsychological assessment of working memory. Behav Brain Res. 2015;292:167-73.
  27. Adleman NE, Menon V, Blasey CM, White CD, Warsofsky IS, Glover GH, et al. A developmental fMRI study of the Stroop color-word task. Neuroimage. 2002;16(1):61-75.
  28. Huijgen BC, Leemhuis S, Kok NM, Verburgh L, Oosterlaan J, Elferink-Gemser MT, et al. Cognitive functions in elite and sub-elite youth soccer players aged 13 to 17 years. PloS One. 2015;10(12), e0144580:1-13.
  29. Drollette ES, Pontifex MB, Raine LB, Scudder MR, Moore RD, Kao SC, et al. Effects of the FITKids physical activity randomized controlled trial on conflict monitoring in youth. Psychophysiology. 2018;55(3):e13017: 1-15.
  30. Pindus DM, Drollette ES, Raine LB, Kao S-C, Khan N, Westfall DR, et al. Moving fast, thinking fast: The relations of physical activity levels and bouts to neuroelectric indices of inhibitory control in preadolescents. J Sport Health Sci. 2019;8(4):301-14.

 

Motor Behavior
Volume 12, Issue 41
Fall 2020
October 2020
Pages 39-54
Files
History
  • Receive Date: 30 March 2020
  • Revise Date: 16 June 2020
  • Accept Date: 27 June 2020
Share
How to cite
Statistics