Motor Behavior

Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on performance of basketball free throws in skilled basketball players

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD Candidate. Islamic Azad University, Khorasgan branch

2 Professor at the Department of Motor Behavior, University of Isfahan

3 Tehran

4 پزشک متخصص اعصاب

Abstract
The Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been studied in descriptive and laboratory tasks in the field of motor and sport skills. It is necessary that tDCS effects on real sport skills are investigated. The aim of the current study was to examine the Effect of tDCS on performance of basketball free throws (BFT) in skilled basketball players. In this quasi- experimental study, a repeated measure design including a pretest, intervention, posttest and follow up was used. A total of 26 male basketball players were randomly divided into either an experimental or a sham group. Both groups watched the point light model of the performance of elite basketball players. Following the observation of point light model, participants of the exercise group received tDCS over their pre-motor cortex for 20 minutes prior to tasks performance. The participants of the sham group underwent identical tasks performance except that tDCS was artificially applied for them. BFT was assessed at baseline (pre-intervention), intervention and post-intervention. For analyzing data, two factor Mixed model ANOVA, independent and paired t-tests were used. Results showed that anodal tDCS created no between group's differences in BFT in the intervention phase while tDCS lead to significant improvement of BFT in experimental group skills compared to sham group in test phase. Results showed that tDCS could be considered as a useful intervention for improvement of BFT in skilled basketball players.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. Schmidt RA, Wrisberg CA. Motor learning and performance: A situation-based learning approach. Human kinetics; 2008.
  2. Lane AM, editor. Sport and exercise psychology. Routledge; 2015 Aug 26.
  3. Kalhornia Golkar M, Soleimani A, Aq AS. transcranial direct current stimulation. Tehran: Science and Culture publication. (2017). (In Persian)
  4. Andrews SC, Hoy KE, Enticott PG, Daskalakis ZJ, Fitzgerald PB. Improving working memory: the effect of combining cognitive activity and anodal transcranial direct current stimulation to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Brain stimulation. 2011 Apr 1; 4(2):84-9.
  5. Manenti R, Brambilla M, Petesi M, Ferrari C, Cotelli M. Enhancing verbal episodic memory in older and young subjects after non-invasive brain stimulation. Frontiers in aging neuroscience. 2013 Sep 11; 5:49.
  6. Antal A, Nitsche MA, Kincses TZ, Kruse W, Hoffmann KP, Paulus W. Facilitation of visuo‐motor learning by transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor and extrastriate visual areas in humans. European Journal of Neuroscience. 2004 May; 19(10):2888-92.
  7. Vines BW, Nair DG, Schlaug G. Contralateral and ipsilateral motor effects after transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroreport. 2006 Apr 24; 17(6):671-4.
  8. D’Urso G, Bruzzese D, Ferrucci R, Priori A, Pascotto A, Galderisi S, Altamura AC, Bravaccio C. Transcranial direct current stimulation for hyperactivity and noncompliance in autistic disorder. The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry. 2015 Jul 4; 16(5):361-6.
  9. Schneider HD, Hopp JP. The use of the Bilingual Aphasia Test for assessment and transcranial direct current stimulation to modulate language acquisition in minimally verbal children with autism. Clinical linguistics & phonetics. 2011 Jun 1; 25(6-7):640-54.
  10. Mahmoodifar E, Movahedi A. R, Arabameri E, Faramarzi S. The Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Selective Motor Training on Gross Motor Skills in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Motor Behavior. Summer 2018; 10 (32): 79-96. (In Persian)
  11. Kaski D, Dominguez RO, Allum JH, Bronstein AM. Improving gait and balance in patients with leukoaraiosis using transcranial direct current stimulation and physical training: an exploratory study. Neurorehabilitation and neural repair. 2013 Nov; 27(9):864-71.
  12. Duarte ND, Grecco LA, Galli M, Fregni F, Oliveira CS. Effect of transcranial direct-current stimulation combined with treadmill training on balance and functional performance in children with cerebral palsy: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. PloS one. 2014 Aug 29; 9(8):e105777.
  13. Reis J, Fritsch B. Modulation of motor performance and motor learning by transcranial direct current stimulation. Current opinion in neurology. 2011 Dec 1; 24(6):590-6.
  14. Tanaka S, Sandrini M, Cohen LG. Modulation of motor learning and memory formation by non-invasive cortical stimulation of the primary motor cortex. Neuropsychological rehabilitation. 2011 Oct 1; 21(5):650-75.
  15. Galea JM, Celnik P. Brain polarization enhances the formation and retention of motor memories. Journal of neurophysiology. 2009 Jul; 102(1):294-301.
  16. Reis J, Schambra HM, Cohen LG, Buch ER, Fritsch B, Zarahn E, Celnik PA, Krakauer JW. Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2009 Feb 3; 106(5):1590-5.
  17. Kaski D, Quadir S, Patel M, Yousif N, Bronstein AM. Enhanced locomotor adaptation aftereffect in the “broken escalator” phenomenon using anodal tDCS. Journal of neurophysiology. 2012 Feb 8; 107(9):2493-505.
  18. Wade S, Hammond G. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over premotor cortex facilitates observational learning of a motor sequence. European Journal of Neuroscience. 2015 Jun; 41(12):1597-602.
  19. Arias P, Corral-Bergantiños Y, Robles-García V, Madrid A, Oliviero A, Cudeiro J. Bilateral tDCS on primary motor cortex: effects on fast arm reaching tasks. PloS one. 2016 Aug 4; 11(8):e0160063.
  20. Shirazi S. The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Performance of Sport Skill، Master's Degree in Motivational Behavior. University of Isfahan; (2018). (In Persian)
  21. Kwon YH, Cho JS. Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Movement Variability in Repetitive-Simple Tapping Task. The Journal of Korean Physical Therapy. 2015 Feb 27; 27(1):38-42.
  22. Ciechanski P, Kirton A. Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS): principles and emerging applications in children. InPediatric Brain Stimulation 2016 Jan 1 (pp. 85-115). Academic Press.
  23. Koyama S, Tanaka S, Tanabe S, Sadato N. Dual-hemisphere transcranial direct current stimulation over primary motor cortex enhances consolidation of a ballistic thumb movement. Neuroscience letters. 2015 Feb 19; 588:49-53.
  24. Doppelmayr M, Pixa NH, Steinberg F. Cerebellar, but not motor or parietal, high-density anodal transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates motor adaptation. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. 2016 Oct; 22(9):928-36.
  25. Abdelmoula A, Baudry S, Duchateau J. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation enhances time to task failure of a submaximal contraction of elbow flexors without changing corticospinal excitability. Neuroscience. 2016 May 13; 322:94-103.
  26. Ranieri F, Podda MV, Riccardi E, Frisullo G, Dileone M, Profice P, Pilato F, Di Lazzaro V, Grassi C. Modulation of LTP at rat hippocampal CA3-CA1 synapses by direct current stimulation. Journal of neurophysiology. 2012 Jan 11; 107(7):1868-80.
  27. Stagg CJ, O’shea J, Kincses ZT, Woolrich M, Matthews PM, Johansen‐Berg H. Modulation of movement‐associated cortical activation by transcranial direct current stimulation. European Journal of Neuroscience. 2009 Oct; 30(7):1412-23.
  28. Johansson G. Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception & psychophysics. 1973 Jun 1; 14(2):201-11.
  29. Bandura A. Theoretical perspectives. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. 1997:1-35.
  30. Brown LE, Wilson ET, Obhi SS, Gribble PL. Effect of trial order and error magnitude on motor learning by observing. Journal of neurophysiology. 2010 Jul 14; 104(3):1409-16.
  31. Cross ES, Kraemer DJ, Hamilton AF, Kelley WM, Grafton ST. Sensitivity of the action observation network to physical and observational learning. Cerebral cortex. 2008 May 30; 19(2):315-26.
  32. Dushanova J, Donoghue J. Neurons in primary motor cortex engaged during action observation. European Journal of Neuroscience. 2010 Jan; 31(2):386-98.
  33. Grezes J, Fonlupt P, Bertenthal B, Delon-Martin C, Segebarth C, Decety J. Does perception of biological motion rely on specific brain regions? Neuroimage. 2001 May 1; 13(5):775-85.
  34. Vaina LM, Solomon J, Chowdhury S, Sinha P, Belliveau JW. Functional neuroanatomy of biological motion perception in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2001 Sep 25; 98(20):11656-61.
  35. Beauchamp MS, Lee KE, Haxby JV, Martin A. FMRI responses to video and point-light displays of moving humans and manipulable objects. Journal of cognitive neuroscience. 2003 Oct 1; 15(7):991-1001.
  36. Puce A, Perrett D. Electrophysiology and brain imaging of biological motion. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. 2003 Feb 19; 358(1431):435-45.
  37. Grèzes J, Armony JL, Rowe J, Passingham RE. Activations related to “mirror” and “canonical” neurones in the human brain: an fMRI study. Neuroimage. 2003 Apr 1; 18(4):928-37.
  38. Lapenta OM, Minati L, Fregni F, Boggio PS. Je pense donc je fais: transcranial direct current stimulation modulates brain oscillations associated with motor imagery and movement observation. Frontiers in human neuroscience. 2013 Jun 6; 7:256.
  39. Saygin AP, Wilson SM, Hagler DJ, Bates E, Sereno MI. Point-light biological motion perception activates human premotor cortex. Journal of Neuroscience. 2004 Jul 7; 24(27):6181-8.
  40. NEURALLY CA. Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage. 2001; 14: S103-9.
  41. Pirmoradian M, Movahedi A. R, Bahram A, A Comparative Study on the Effectiveness of Video Modeling and Video Self–modeling on Interventions on Learning of Basketball Free Throws in Children with Intellectual Disabilities.
  42. Amirtash A. M, Jalali Sh, Zia Azizi F, Comparison of effect of skilled, non-skilled and point-light technique model on learning and performance of basketball shot, Journal of Research in Sport Management & Motor Behavior, 2015; 4(7): 17. magiran.com/p1386869
  43. Flöel A, Suttorp W, Kohl O, Kürten J, Lohmann H, Breitenstein C, Knecht S. Non-invasive brain stimulation improves object-location learning in the elderly. Neurobiology of aging. 2012 Aug 1; 33(8):1682-9.
  44. Kang EK, Paik NJ. Effect of a tDCS electrode montage on implicit motor sequence learning in healthy subjects. Experimental & translational stroke medicine. 2011 Dec; 3(1):4.
  45. Waters-Metenier S, Husain M, Wiestler T, Diedrichsen J. Bihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation enhances effector-independent representations of motor synergy and sequence learning. Journal of Neuroscience. 2014 Jan 15; 34(3):1037-50.
  46. Cantarero G, Spampinato D, Reis J, Ajagbe L, Thompson T, Kulkarni K, Celnik P. Cerebellar direct current stimulation enhances on-line motor skill acquisition through an effect on accuracy. Journal of Neuroscience. 2015 Feb 18; 35(7):3285-90.
  47. Doppelmayr M, Pixa NH, Steinberg F. Cerebellar, but not motor or parietal, high-density anodal transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates motor adaptation. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. 2016 Oct; 22(9):928-36.
  48. de Xivry JJ, Marko MK, Pekny SE, Pastor D, Izawa J, Celnik P, Shadmehr R. Stimulation of the human motor cortex alters generalization patterns of motor learning. Journal of Neuroscience. 2011 May 11; 31(19):7102-10.
  49. Miyaguchi S, Onishi H, Kojima S, Sugawara K, Tsubaki A, Kirimoto H, Tamaki H, Yamamoto N. Corticomotor excitability induced by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation with and without non-exhaustive movement. Brain research. 2013 Sep 5; 1529:83-91.
  50. Nissim NR, O'Shea A, Indahlastari A, Kraft JN, Von Mering O, Aksu S, Porges E, Cohen R, Woods AJ. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation paired with cognitive training on functional connectivity of the working memory network in older adults. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. 2019; 11:340.
  51. Marvel CL, Morgan OE, Kronemer SI. How the motor system integrates with working memory. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2019 Apr 27.
Motor Behavior
Volume 16, Issue 55
April 2024
Pages 17-34

  • Receive Date 28 October 2019
  • Revise Date 05 July 2020
  • Accept Date 24 July 2020

Home

Reviewers

Submit Manuscript

Publication Ethics

news

Journal Metrics

Contact Us