Motor Behavior

Effect of internal and close- or far-external attentional focus imagery on response time among skilled Karatekas

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of motor behavior, Faculty of sport sciences, Ferdowsi university of Mashhad

2 Department of motor behavior, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

Abstract
Motor imagery is a complex cognitive action that represents mentally the process of performing a movement (from preparation to the intention). In the current study, the effect of internal versus close- or far- external instruction of attention focusing during motor imagery on response time of four well-trained karate skills was evaluated. In a semi-experimental design, 43 skilled athletes (24 women, 19 men; mean age: 15.88 ± 4.50) executed the pre-test in front of a researcher-made device. Unexpected visual stimuli were presented randomly by the device, and response times of each skill were recorded by a software synced to the device. Then, each of the Karatekas participated in one of three training groups of imagining, namely, internal attention (7 women, 7 men), close-external attention (6 women, 5 men), far-external attention (6 women, 5 men) in 12 sessions, or in a control group (5 women, 2 men). After performing the post-test identical to pre-test, by carrying out a mixed-model analysis of covariance, the results revealed that there was no significant effect of gender, and only close-external imagery resulted in promoting lower body techniques (p<0.05). However, such an effect did not observe for upper body techniques, and effect of keeping focus of attention on body extremities (internal attentional imagery) and on far outcome of movement (far-external attentional imagery) were not significant (p>0.05). The findings suggest, during mental rehearsal, the analogy of athlete’s external attentional strategy to actual task plays an important role on effectiveness of motor imagery.

Keywords

  1. Kilteni K, Andersson BJ, Houborg C, Ehrsson HH. Motor imagery involves predicting the sensory consequences of the imagined movement. Nature communications. 2018;9(1):1-9.
  2. Cunnington R, Iansek R, Bradshaw JL, Phillips JG. Movement-related potentials associated with movement preparation and motor imagery. Experimental brain research. 1996;111(3):429-36.
  3. Guillot A, Collet C. Contribution from neurophysiological and psychological methods to the study of motor imagery. Brain Research Reviews. 2005b;50(2):387-97.
  4. Jeannerod M. The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behavioral and Brain sciences. 1994;17(2):187-202.
  5. Clark S, Tremblay F, Ste-Marie D. Differential modulation of corticospinal excitability during observation, mental imagery and imitation of hand actions. Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(1):105-12.
  6. Collet C, Guillot A, Lebon F, MacIntyre T, Moran A. Measuring motor imagery using psychometric, behavioral, and psychophysiological tools. Exercise and sport sciences reviews. 2011;39(2):85-92.
  7. Guillot A, Collet C. Duration of mentally simulated movement: a review. Journal of motor behavior. 2005a;37(1):10-20.
  8. Munzert J, Lorey B, Zentgraf K. Cognitive motor processes: the role of motor imagery in the study of motor representations. Brain research reviews. 2009;60(2):306-26.
  9. Sheikh AA, Korn ER. Imagery in sports and physical performance: Baywood Publishing Company, Inc.; 1994.
  10. Decety J, Jeannerod M. Mentally simulated movements in virtual reality: does Fitt's law hold in motor imagery? Behavioural brain research. 1995;72(1-2):127-34.
  11. Beyer L, Weiss T, Hansen E, Wolf A, Seidel A. Dynamics of central nervous activation during motor imagination. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 1990;9(1):75-80.
  12. Reed CL. Chronometric comparisons of imagery to action: Visualizing versus physically performing springboard dives. Memory & Cognition. 2002;30(8):1169-78.
  13. Hall CR, Martin KA. Measuring movement imagery abilities: a revision of the movement imagery questionnaire. Journal of mental imagery. 1997.
  14. Isaac AR, Marks DF. Individual differences in mental imagery experience: developmental changes and specialization. British Journal of Psychology. 1994;85(4):479-500.
  15. Campos A. Gender differences in imagery. Personality and Individual Differences. 2014;59:107-11.
  16. Guillot A, Collet C. The neurophysiological foundations of mental and motor imagery: Oxford University Press; 2010.
  17. Guillot A, Collet C, Dittmar A. Relationship Between Visual and Kinesthetic Imagery, Field Dependence-Independence, and Complex Motor Skills. Journal of Psychophysiology. 2004;18(4):190.
  18. Robin N, Dominique L, Toussaint L, Blandin Y, Guillot A, Her ML. Effects of motor imagery training on service return accuracy in tennis: The role of imagery ability. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2007;5(2):175-86.
  19. Driskell JE, Copper C, Moran A. Does mental practice enhance performance? Journal of applied psychology. 1994;79(4):481.
  20. Feltz DL, Landers DM. The effects of mental practice on motor skill learning and performance: A meta-analysis. 2007.
  21. Munroe KJ, Giacobbi PR, Hall C, Weinberg R. The four Ws of imagery use: Where, when, why, and what. The Sport Psychologist. 2000;14(2):119-37.
  22. Dietrich A. Imaging the imagination: the trouble with motor imagery. Methods. 2008;45(4):319-24.
  23. Fathizadeh A, Sohrabi M, Saberi Kakhki A. [Effect of Imagining the Strategy of Play and Imagining the Motor Skill on Youths' Sport Performance in Karate (In Persian)]. Journal of motor developement and learning. 2022:-.
  24. Khooshabeh P, Hegarty M, editors. Representations of shape during mental rotation. 2010 AAAI spring symposium series; 2010.
  25. Bruton AM, Holmes PS, Eaves DL, Franklin ZC, Wright DJ. Neurophysiological markers discriminate different forms of motor imagery during action observation. cortex. 2020;124:119-36.
  26. Guillot A, Rienzo FD, Frank C, Debarnot U, MacIntyre TE. From simulation to motor execution: a review of the impact of dynamic motor imagery on performance. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2021:1-20.
  27. O’Shea H, Moran A. Does motor simulation theory explain the cognitive mechanisms underlying motor imagery? A critical review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2017;11:72.
  28. Emadifar F, Gorji Y. [Effectiveness of attention training on attention control, focused attention and dispersed attention in girl students with test anxiety (In Persian)]. Quarterly journal of child mental health. 2017;4(1):67-77.
  29. Porter JM, Nolan RP, Ostrowski EJ, Wulf G. Directing attention externally enhances agility performance: A qualitative and quantitative analysis of the efficacy of using verbal instructions to focus attention. Frontiers in psychology. 2010;1:216.
  30. Wulf G, Höß M, Prinz W. Instructions for motor learning: Differential effects of internal versus external focus of attention. Journal of motor behavior. 1998;30(2):169-79.
  31. Al-Abood SA, Bennett SJ, Hernandez FM, Ashford D, Davids K. Effect of verbal instructions and image size on visual search strategies in basketball free throw shooting. Journal of sports sciences. 2002;20(3):271-8.
  32. Wulf G, McConnel N, Gärtner M, Schwarz A. Enhancing the learning of sport skills through external-focus feedback. Journal of motor behavior. 2002;34(2):171-82.
  33. Wulf G. Attentional focus and motor learning: a review of 15 years. International Review of sport and Exercise psychology. 2013;6(1):77-104.
  34. Wulf G, McNevin N, Shea CH. The automaticity of complex motor skill learning as a function of attentional focus. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A. 2001;54(4):1143-54.
  35. Sakurada T, Hirai M, Watanabe E. Optimization of a motor learning attention-directing strategy based on an individual’s motor imagery ability. Experimental brain research. 2016;234(1):301-11.
  36. Taylor J. A conceptual model for integrating athletes’ needs and sport demands in the development of competitive mental preparation strategies. The Sport Psychologist. 1995;9(3):339-57.
  37. Guillot A, Desliens S, Rouyer C, Rogowski I. Motor imagery and tennis serve performance: the external focus efficacy. Journal of sports science & medicine. 2013;12(2):332.
  38. Kharestani M, Esmaeeli Abdar M, Gholipour M. [Changes Related to Performing Attentional Focus Imagery on Dynamic Balance in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis (In Persian)]. Journal of Advances in Medical and Biomedical Research. 2017;25(108):96-106.
  39. Milley KR, Ouellette GP. Putting attention on the spot in coaching: Shifting to an external focus of attention with imagery techniques to improve basketball free-throw shooting performance. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021;12:645676.
  40. Haghkhah A, Sohrabi M, Hamidreza T, Ghalehroudhkani H, Tabar M. The effect of mental imagery focus of attention on performance and learning of children dart throwing skill. International Journal of Sport Studies. 2014;4(1):161-7.
  41. McNevin NH, Shea CH, Wulf G. Increasing the distance of an external focus of attention enhances learning. Psychological research. 2003;67(1):22-9.
  42. Tahan a, Aghdai m, Farsi a. [The Effect of Focus of Attention in Mental Imagery on Kinematics of Basketball Free Throw (In Persian)]. Motor Behavior. 2021:-.
  43. Murphy S, Nordin S, Cumming J. Imagery in sport, exercise, and dance. In T. S. Horn (Ed.), Advances in sport psychology (pp. 297–324,463–467). Human Kinetics. 2008.
  44. Kraeutner SN, McWhinney SR, Solomon JP, Dithurbide L, Boe SG. Experience modulates motor imagery‐based brain activity. European Journal of Neuroscience. 2018;47(10):1221-9.
  45. Iftikhar MT, Mallett CJ, Javed MA, editors. Imagery improves reaction time in elite sprinters. 6th International Congress on Sport Sciences Research and Technology Support; 2018.
  46. Theeuwes M, Liefooghe B, De Schryver M, De Houwer J. The role of motor imagery in learning via instructions. Acta Psychologica. 2018;184:110-23.
  47. Kraeutner SN, Gaughan TC, Eppler SN, Boe SG. Motor imagery-based implicit sequence learning depends on the formation of stimulus-response associations. Acta psychologica. 2017;178:48-55.
  48. Kraeutner SN, MacKenzie LA, Westwood DA, Boe SG. Characterizing skill acquisition through motor imagery with no prior physical practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2016;42(2):257.
  49. Sohrabi M, Farsi A, Fouladian J. [Validity and reliability determination of persian version of revised movement imagery quesstionnaire (In Persian)]. Motor behavior. 2010;2(5):13-23.
  50. Schmidt RA, Lee TD, Winstein C, Wulf G, Zelaznik HN. Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis: Human kinetics; 2018.
  51. Holmes PS, Collins DJ. The PETTLEP approach to motor imagery: A functional equivalence model for sport psychologists. Journal of applied sport psychology. 2001;13(1):60-83.
  52. Roure R, Collet C, Deschaumes-Molinaro C, Delhomme G, Dittmar A, Vernet-Maury E. Imagery quality estimated by autonomic response is correlated to sporting performance enhancement. Physiology & behavior. 1999;66(1):63-72.
  53. Ebrahimi Hagh Z. [Effects of the internal and external verbal-visual cues during mental training of walking on kinetics of lower extremity in inactive compared to active older adults (In Persian)]. Research in Motor Behavior. 2013;1(1):23-37.
  54. Hardy L, Callow N. Efficacy of external and internal visual imagery perspectives for the enhancement of performance on tasks in which form is important. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 1999;21(2):95-112.
  55. Callow N, Roberts R. Visual imagery perspectives and preference: Conceptualization and measurement. 2012.
  56. Ingram TG, Kraeutner SN, Solomon JP, Westwood DA, Boe SG. Skill acquisition via motor imagery relies on both motor and perceptual learning. Behavioral Neuroscience. 2016;130(2):252.
  57. Laeng B, Teodorescu DS. Eye scanpaths during visual imagery reenact those of perception of the same visual scene. Cognitive Science. 2002;26(2):207-31.
  58. Williams AM, Singer RN, Frehlich SG. Quiet eye duration, expertise, and task complexity in near and far aiming tasks. Journal of motor behavior. 2002;34(2):197-207.
  59. Abedi P, Tahmasebi Boroujeni S, Shahbazi M. The influence of focus of attention types on anticipatory motor planning and its relation to executive function in people with MS. Motor Behavior. 2022;14(47):129-56.
  60. Richardson JT. Gender differences in imagery, cognition, and memory. Advances in psychology. 80: Elsevier; 1991. p. 271-303.
  61. Conson M, De Bellis F, Baiano C, Zappullo I, Raimo G, Finelli C, et al. Sex differences in implicit motor imagery: Evidence from the hand laterality task. Acta Psychologica. 2020;203:103010.
  62. Hegarty M. Ability and sex differences in spatial thinking: What does the mental rotation test really measure? Psychonomic bulletin & review. 2018;25(3):1212-9.
  63. Sackett RS. The influence of symbolic rehearsal upon the retention of a maze habit. The Journal of General Psychology. 1934;10(2):376-98.
  64. ANEES AS. Enhancing athletic performance through imagery: an overview. Imagery in sports and physical performance. 1994:1.
  65. Morris T, Spittle M, Watt AP. Imagery in sport: Human Kinetics; 2005.
  66. Wulf G, Lewthwaite R. Effortless motor learning? An external focus of attention enhances movement effectiveness and efficiency. Effortless attention: A new perspective in the cognitive science of attention and action. 2010:75-101.
Motor Behavior
Volume 15, Issue 54
December 2024
Pages 17-46

  • Receive Date 13 August 2022
  • Revise Date 12 September 2022
  • Accept Date 18 January 2023

Home

Reviewers

Submit Manuscript

Publication Ethics

news

Journal Metrics

Contact Us