Motor Behavior

The Effect of Sports vision training and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on short-term visual memory and recognition memory of Volleyball Players

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

fateme sadat baghande 1
Fatemeh Sadat Hosseini 2
Jalal Dehghanizade 3

1 urmia

2 Motor Behavior,Urmia University

3 Assistant Professor in Motor Behavior/ Faculty of sport sciences/ Department of Motor Behavior and Sport Management/ Urmia University , Urmia, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22089/mbj.2022.12031.2014
Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effect of sport vision and tDCS training on the short-term visual memory and recognition memory of volleyball players. 36 male volleyball players (aged between 18-27 years) were selected using the convenience sampling method. Then they were randomly divided into three groups: control, sport vision, and tDCS training groups. To measure visual function, a pack of KANTIB software tests was used. The sport vision and tDCS training in intervention groups lasted for 10 sessions and 20 minutes. A post-test was performed for both groups after 10 sessions of electronic stimulation of the skull indirectly. The covariance analysis test and Bonferroni post hoc test were used to analyze the results. Results of the present study showed a significant effect of tDCS training on volleyball player's vision compared to sport vision training. It can be concluded that tDCS training in the present study was suitable for improving visual function in both short-term visual memory and recognition memory. It could be used as an intervention method to improve the visual function of volleyball Players.

Keywords

Sports vision training
tDCS
Volleyball players
Subjects
  1. Campher J. The role of visual skills and its impact on skills performance of cricket players (Doctoral dissertation]. [] : University of Pretoria; .
  2. Wilson T, Falke J. Sports vision training for better performance; 2004. Available at: https://www.human-kinetics.co.uk/9781492573173/sportsvision
  3. Ahmed MF, Shosha Nt. Efficiency of the program of visual training on some visual skills and visual perceptual skills and their relationship to performance level synchronized swimming juniors. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2010; 5:2082-8.
  4. Soto D, Llewelyn D, Silvanto J. Distinct causal mechanisms of attentional guidance by working memory and repetition priming in early visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience. 2012;32(10):3447-52.
  5. Szymanski JM, Lowe HE, Szymanski DJ, Cicciarella CF, Lowe DW, Gilliam ST, Spaniol FJ. Effect of visual training on batting performance and pitch recognition of division I softball players. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2011;25: S49-50.
  6. Abernethy B, Wood JM. Do generalized visual training programmes for sport really work? An experimental investigation. Journal of sports sciences. 2001;19(3):203-22.
  7. Wood JM, Abernethy B. An assessment of the efficacy of sports vision training programs. Optometry and vision science: official publication of the American Academy of Optometry. 1997;74(8):646-59.
  8. Gholami A. The difference in visual skills between expert versus novice soccer referees. Journal of Human Kinetics. 2010;22(2009):15-20. (In Persian).
  9. Buch ER, Santarnecchi E, Antal A, Born J, Celnik PA, Classen J, et al. Effects of tDCS on motor learning and memory formation: a consensus and critical position paper. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2017;128(4):589-603.
  10. Vaeyens R, Lenoir M, Williams AM, Mazyn L, Philippaerts RM. The effects of task constraints on visual search behavior and decision-making skill in youth soccer players. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2007;29(2):147-69.
  11. Teixeira-Santos AC, Nafee T, Sampaio A, Leite J, Carvalho S. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on working memory in healthy older adults: a systematic review. Principles and Practice of Clinical Research. 2015;1(3): .
  12. Kumari N. Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation to influence motor learning [Doctoral dissertation]. [] : Auckland University of Technology; .
  13. Tate B, Paul M, Jaspal S. The impact of visual skills training program on batting performance in cricketers. Serbian Journal of Sports Sciences. 2008;2(1):17-23.
  14. Bolzoni F, Pettersson LG, Jankowska E. Evidence for long‐lasting subcortical facilitation by transcranial direct current stimulation in the cat. The Journal of Physiology. 2013;591(13):3381-99.
  15. Ballard HK, Goen JR, Maldonado T, Bernard JA. Effects of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on the cognitive stage of sequence learning. Journal of Neurophysiology. 2019;122(2):490-9.
  16. Ke Y, Wang N, Du J, Kong L, Liu S, Xu M, An X, Ming D. The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on working memory training in healthy young adults. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2019; 13:19.
  17. Chraif M. Gender influences in peripheral and central visual perception for the young. Procedia-social and Behavioral Sciences. 2013; 84:1100-4.
  18. Ryan K, Schranz AL, Duggal N, Bartha R. Differential effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on antiphase and inphase motor tasks: a pilot study. Behavioural Brain Research. 2019; 366:13-8.
  19. Groppa S, Oliviero A, Eisen A, Quartarone A, Cohen LG, Mall V, et al. A practical guide to diagnostic transcranial magnetic stimulation: report of an IFCN committee. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2012;123(5):858-82.
  20. Boggio PS, Khoury LP, Martins DC, Martins OE, De Macedo EC, Fregni F. Temporal cortex direct current stimulation enhances performance on a visual recognition memory task in Alzheimer disease. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 2009;80(4):444-7.
  21. Oliveira JF, Zanão TA, Valiengo L, Lotufo PA, Benseñor IM, Fregni F, Brunoni AR. Acute working memory improvement after tDCS in antidepressant-free patients with major depressive disorder. Neuroscience Letters. 2013; 537:60-4.
  22. Molero-Chamizo A, Bailén JR, Béjar TG, López MG. Poststimulation time interval-dependent effects of motor cortex anodal tDCS on reaction-time task performance. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience. 2018;18(1):167-75.
  23. Gowan S, Hordacre B. Transcranial direct current stimulation to facilitate lower limb recovery following stroke: current evidence and future directions. Brain sciences. 2020;10(5):310.
  24. Meier B, Rothen N, Walter S. Developmental aspects of synaesthesia across the adult lifespan. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2014; 8:129.
  25. Abernethy B. Selective attention in fast ball sports. II: Expert novice differences. Australian Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 1987;19(4):7-16.
  26. Nitsche MA, Boggio PS, Fregni,F, Pascual-Leone,A.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation of depressionwith transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): a review. Journal of Experimental Neurology. 2012;219,14-9.
  27. Schmidt RA, Lee TD. Motor control and learning: a behavioral emphasis. Champaign Human Kinetics;
  28. Nitsche MA, Seeber A, Frommann K, Klein CC, Rochford C, Nitsche MS, et al. Modulating parameters of excitability during and after transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. The Journal of Physiology. 2005;568(1):291-303.
  29. Pixa NH, Pollok B. Effects of tDCS on bimanual motor skills: a brief review. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience. 2018; 12:63.
  30. McLeod B, Hansen E. The effects of the Eyerobics visual skills training program on hand-eye coordination. Canadian Journal of Sports Sciences. 1989; 14:127.
  31. Seidel-Marzi O, Ragert P. Neurodiagnostics in sports: investigating the Athlete’s brain to augment performance and sport-specific skills. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2020; 14:133.
  32. Mehdipour R, Namazizadeh M, Badam R, Mir Hosseini H. Comparison of effects of the transcranial direct current stimulation (tDSC) of vision and motor cortex on learning of basketball free throw. Journal of Development and Motor Learning. 2020;12(2):117-31. (In Persian).
  33. Fregni F, Boggio PS, Nitsche M, Bermpohl F, Antal A, Feredoes E, et al. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex enhances working memory. Experimental Brain Research. 2005;166(1):23-30.
  34. Mulquiney PG, Hoy KE, Daskalakis ZJ, Fitzgerald PB. Improving working memory: exploring the effect of transcranial random noise stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation on the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2011;122(12):2384-9.
  35. Williams AM, Davids K. Eye movements and visual perception in sport. Coaching Focus. 1994; 26:6-9.
  36. Nemanich ST, Rich TL, Gordon AM, Friel KM, Gillick BT. Bimanual skill learning after transcranial direct current stimulation in children with unilateral cerebral palsy: a brief report. Developmental Neurorehabilitation. 2019;22(7):504-8.
  37. Adams JA. Historical review and appraisal of research on the learning, retention, and transfer of human motor skills. Psychological Bulletin. 1987;101(1):41.
  38. Ansari N, Shojaei M, Rostami R. The effect of repeated magnetic stimulation of the brain on the visual memory of female elite athletes [Master's thesis]. [Tehran]: Alzahra University; (In Persian).
  39. Crossman ER. A theory of the acquisition of speed-skill. Ergonomics. 1959;2(2):153-66.
Motor Behavior
Volume 14, Issue 48
Autumn 2022
Pages 161-184

  • Receive Date 09 January 2022
  • Revise Date 08 February 2023
  • Accept Date 06 September 2022

Home

Reviewers

Submit Manuscript

Publication Ethics

news

Journal Metrics

Contact Us