Motor Behavior

Nature-based Physical Activity: A Semi-Experimental Study of the Effect of Gardening Activities on Children’s Perceptual-Motor development and drawing index

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor of Physical Education and Sport Sciencesو University of Art, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor of Psychology, Naein Branch, Islamic Azad University, Naein, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Technical and Vocational University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract
The aim of present study was to investigate the effect of nature-based physical activity with a focuse on gardening on visual-motor coordination and drawing indices of female 5-year-old children. For this purpose, 30 children from Isfahan without attending preschool were selected by available sampling method and randomly divided into two groups: 1) experimental groups (15 people) and 2) control group (15 people). After the pre-test, the experimental group trained in the nature-based physical activity protocol including eight session, 60-minute per sessions (twice a week). Then both groups participated in the post-test. Visual-motor and shape drawing were evaluated by the Bander Gestalt test. The data was analyzed using SPSS-24 software in two descriptive sections including (mean and standard deviation) and inferential (analysis of Variance for the effectiveness of nature-based physical activity). The results showed that nature-based physical activity exercises with gardening performance had a significant positive effect on visual-motor coordination and drawing indices of 5-year-old children. The difference between the experimental and the control groups showed that the children who were active in the nature environment significantly had better visual-motor coordination and drawing indices. In general, nature-based physical activity and gardening help children to develop their sensory-motor skills, including writing and drawing skills, to enter school.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. Groth-Marnat G. Handbook of psychological assessment 94 thed. united state of america: Wiely 2003.
  2. Strooband KF, de Rosnay M, Okely AD, Veldman SL. Systematic review and meta-analyses: Motor skill interventions to improve fine motor development in children aged birth to 6 years. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics. 2020;41(4):319-31.
  3. Perret E. Organic brain pathology and the Bender-Gestalt test. A differential diagnostic scoring system: Edited by ML Marley. Grune and Stratton, New York, 1982, 264 pp. $29.50. Pergamon; 1983.
  4. Baluoti AR, Bayat MR, Alimoradi M. Relationship between visual perception and reading disability in primary students (first, second, third, grade) of Ahwaz city. International research journal of applied and basic sciences. 2012;3(10):2091-6.
  5. Sood V, Ahmad W, Chavan B. Effect of bocce game on developing visual motor integration among children with intellectual disability. Journal of Disability Management and Rehabilitation. 2016:54-8.
  6. Barnhardt C, Borsting E, Deland P, Pham N, Vu T. Relationship between visual-motor integration and spatial organization of written language and math. Optometry and Vision Science. 2005;82(2):138-43.
  7. Fathirezaie Z, Abbaspour K, Badicu G, Zamani Sani SH, Nobari H. The effect of environmental contexts on motor proficiency and social maturity of children: An ecological perspective. Children. 2021;8(2):157.
  8. Abou-El-Saad T, Afsah O, Baz H, Shaaban W. The relationship between visual—motor integration and handwriting skills in Arabic-speaking Egyptian children at the age of 4–6 years. The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology. 2017;33(4):663-9.
  9. Sulik MJ, Haft SL, Obradović J. Visual-motor integration, executive functions, and academic achievement: Concurrent and longitudinal relations in late elementary school. Early Education and Development. 2018;29(7):956-70.
  10. Hambooshi L. The Effect of Motor Dependent/Independent Visual Perception Training on Visual -Motor Integration and Fine Motor Skills of 7 - 8 -year -old Children: The Retest of Movement Hypothesis. Research in Sport Management & Motor Behavior. 2022;6 (23):15.
  11. Africa EK, van Deventer KJ. A motor-skills programme to enhance visual motor integration of selected pre-school learners. Early Child Development and Care. 2017;187(12):1960-70.
  12. Poon K, Li-Tsang C, Weiss T, Rosenblum S. The effect of a computerized visual perception and visual-motor integration training program on improving Chinese handwriting of children with handwriting difficulties. Research in developmental disabilities. 2010;31(6):1552-60.
  13. The effect of family-centered nature therapy on children with autism spectrum disorder. Archives of Rehabilitation. 2018;19(2):150-9.
  14. Louv R. Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder: Algonquin books; 2008.
  15. Johnstone A, McCrorie P, Cordovil R, Fjørtoft I, Iivonen S, Jidovtseff B, et al. Nature-Based Early Childhood Education and Children’s Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior, Motor Competence, and Other Physical Health Outcomes: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review. Journal of Physical Activity and Health. 2022;19(6):456-72.
  16. Bai P, Thornton A, Lester L, Schipperijn J, Trapp G, Boruff B, et al. Nature play and fundamental movement skills training programs improve childcare educator supportive physical activity behavior. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020;17(1):223.
  17. Lysklett OB, Berg A, Moe B. Motor competence and physical fitness among children attending nature preschools and traditional preschools. International Journal of Play. 2019;8(1):53-64.
  18. Gruno J, Gibbons SL. Incorporating nature-based physical activity in physical and health education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance. 2020;91(3):26-34.
  19. Lachowycz K, Jones AP. Towards a better understanding of the relationship between greenspace and health: Development of a theoretical framework. Landscape and urban planning. 2013;118:62-9.
  20. Foley R, Kistemann T. Blue space geographies: Enabling health in place. Health & place. 2015;35:157-65.
  21. Flett RM, Moore RW, Pfeiffer KA, Belonga J, Navarre J. Connecting children and family with nature-based physical activity. American Journal of Health Education. 2010;41(5):292-300.
  22. Nisbet EK, Zelenski JM, Murphy SA. The nature relatedness scale: Linking individuals' connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and behavior. 2009;41(5):715-40.
  23. Nigg C, Schipperijn J, Hennig O, Petzold MB, Rulf E, Meyer-Lindenberg A, et Time to go green? Nature-based physical activity as potential treatment for mental disorders. Sports Psychiatry: Journal of Sports and Exercise Psychiatry. 2022.
  24. Pem D. Factors affecting early childhood growth and development: Golden 1000 days. Adv Practice Nurs. 2015;1(101):2573-0347.
  25. Osher D, Cantor P, Berg J, Steyer L, Rose T. Drivers of Human Development: How Relationships and Context Shape Learning and Development 1. The Science of Learning and Development: Routledge; 2021. p. 55-104.
  26. Sando OJ, Sandseter EBH. Affordances for physical activity and well-being in the ECEC outdoor environment. Journal of environmental psychology. 2020;69:101430.
  27. Ethier S. Developmental benefits of play on a natural playground. 2017.
  28. Coventry PA, Brown JE, Pervin J, Brabyn S, Pateman R, Breedvelt J, et al. Nature-based outdoor activities for mental and physical health: Systematic review and meta-analysis. SSM-population health. 2021;16:100934.
  29. Muela A, Larrea I, Miranda N, Barandiaran A. Improving the quality of preschool outdoor environments: Getting children involved. European early childhood education research journal. 2019;27(3):385-96.
  30. Fedorko V, Kahan J, Lilienthal M, Markeprand SE, Sabol M, Sýkorová J. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF PRE-SCHOOL MANAGERS IN THE CONTEXT OF OUTDOOR EDUCATION IN PRE-PRIMARY EDUCATION. 2022.
  31. The influence of environment potentiality (affordances) on motor development in 6–9 years old children with intellectual disability. Sport Sciences for Health. 2019;15(3):497-502.
  32. Roopesh BN. Vineland social maturity scale: An update on administration and scoring. Indian J Clin Psychol. 2019;46(2):91-102.
  33. 33. Wright JH. Affordances for Physically Active Play in an Outdoor, Nature-Rich Preschool 2019.
  34. Lim C, Donovan AM, Harper NJ, Naylor P-J. Nature elements and fundamental motor skill development opportunities at five elementary school districts in British Columbia. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2017;14(10):1
  35. Ceciliani A, Bortolotti A. Outdoor motor play: analysis, speculations, research paths. CEPS Journal. 2013;3(3):65-86.
  36. Müller AB, Valentini NC, Bandeira PFR. Affordances in the home environment for motor development: Validity and reliability for the use in daycare setting. Infant behavior and development. 2017;47:138-45.
  37. Hanscom AJ. Balanced and barefoot: How unrestricted outdoor play makes for strong, confident, and capable children: New Harbinger Publications; 2016.
  38. Payne VG, Isaacs Human motor development: A lifespan approach: Routledge; 2017.
  39. Homayounnia M, Sheikh M, Hemayattalab R, Shahrbanian S. The effects of environmental affordances on perception of vision and balance in children with intellectual disability. Motor Behavior. 2018;9(30):165-82.
  40. Fathi Rezaie Z, Abbaspour K, Zamani Sani SH. The effect of play in natural outdoor and indoor space on the social and perceptual development of preschool children. Motor Behavior. 2020;12(40):
    103-20.
  41. Geuze RH. On constraints and affordances in motor development and learning–The case of DCD. A commentary on Wade & Kazeck (2017). Human Movement Science. 2018;57:505-9.
Motor Behavior
Volume 15, Issue 54
December 2024
Pages 79-96

  • Receive Date 01 March 2023
  • Revise Date 06 December 2023
  • Accept Date 26 February 2024

Home

Reviewers

Submit Manuscript

Publication Ethics

news

Journal Metrics

Contact Us