The Effect of Age-Based Stereotype Activation on Functional Balance in Older Adults: The Mediating Role of Cognitive Control Resources

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Department of Motor Behavior, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract
Extended Abstract
Background and Purpose
Population aging poses a significant public health challenge, with functional balance playing a crucial role in the mobility, independence, and quality of life of older adults. Balance is a complex skill that depends not only on sensory and motor systems but also on cognitive and psychological processes. Recent research highlights the influence of age-based stereotypes (ABS) on older adults' performance, particularly through the mechanism of stereotype threat (ST). When negative ABS are activated, older adults may experience anxiety and increased self-monitoring, leading to performance decrements. However, empirical findings regarding the effects of stereotype threat on balance performance remain inconsistent (e.g., Barber & Mather, 2014; Borel et al., 2024).
According to the integrated stereotype threat model (Schmader et al., 2008), stereotype activation consumes cognitive control resources that are otherwise required for effective task execution. Because functional balance—especially in complex tasks—relies on attentional control, working memory, and self-regulation, depletion of these resources may impair postural stability. Despite strong theoretical support, the mediating role of cognitive control resources in the relationship between ABS activation and functional balance has not been directly examined. The present study addresses this gap by investigating whether cognitive control resources mediate the effects of positive and negative age stereotypes on older adults' functional balance using a cognitively demanding balance task.
Methods
This experimental study investigated the effects of ABS on functional balance and cognitive control in older women. The sample consisted of 51 community-dwelling women aged 60 to 76 years (M = 65.92, SD = 3.78), all of whom demonstrated healthy cognitive functioning. At baseline, participants completed the Brief Ageing Perceptions Questionnaire and the Perceived Importance of Physical Activity for Older Adults.
Participants were randomly assigned to one of three ABS conditions: positive, negative, or nullified groups. Prior to task performance, individuals in the experimental groups were exposed to standardized written and verbal instructions designed to activate either positive or negative ABS. The positive ABS condition emphasized the accumulated motor experience of older adults and the preservation of physical abilities, whereas the negative ABS condition highlighted age-related physical decline and explicit comparisons with younger adults. The nullified control group received no information, either implicit or explicit, about ABS.
Functional balance was assessed both before (T1) and after (T2) ABS activation using an advanced version of the Square Stepping Exercise (SSE; Shigematsu & Okura, 2006). This task required participants to execute a predefined sequence of multidirectional steps as quickly and accurately as possible. It was selected due to its sensitivity to motor coordination and executive control demands (see Fig. 1).
Cognitive control was evaluated using a computerized Stroop task (Stroop, 1935), with reaction times for congruent and incongruent stimuli recorded at both measurement points. The effectiveness of the ABS manipulation was verified using a brief two-item manipulation check questionnaire.
Statistical analyses included univariate analyses of variance (ANOVAs) to examine group differences in demographic variables, baseline psychological characteristics, and manipulation-check responses. Changes in functional balance and Stroop performance were analyzed using a 3 (ABS condition: positive, negative, control) × 2 (time: pre-test, post-test) mixed-design ANOVA. Mediation analyses were conducted using the PROCESS macro (Model 4; version 5; Hayes, 2022), with bootstrap resampling, to estimate indirect effects and corresponding confidence intervals.

Fig 1. The advanced sequential stepping pattern used to assess functional balance, adapted from Shigematsu and Okura (2006).
Cognitive control was evaluated using a computerized Stroop task (Stroop, 1935), with reaction times for congruent and incongruent stimuli recorded at both measurement points. The effectiveness of the ABS manipulation was verified using a brief two-item manipulation check questionnaire.
Statistical analyses included univariate analyses of variance (ANOVAs) to examine group differences in demographic variables, baseline psychological characteristics, and manipulation-check responses. Changes in functional balance and Stroop performance were analyzed using a 3 (ABS condition: positive, negative, control) × 2 (time: pre-test, post-test) mixed-design ANOVA. Mediation analyses were conducted using the PROCESS macro (Model 4; version 5; Hayes, 2022), with bootstrap resampling, to estimate indirect effects and corresponding confidence intervals.

Results
The manipulation check confirmed that ABS activations were effective.
Effects of ABS on Functional Balance and Stroop Reaction Time
For functional balance, the results revealed significant main effects of ABS condition, F(2, 48) = 20.54, p < .001, η²ₚ = .46, and time, F(1, 48) = 35.77, p < .001, η²ₚ = .43, as well as a significant interaction, F(2, 48) = 61.32, p < .001, η²ₚ = .72. No significant differences were observed between groups at pre-test (T1). At post-test (T2), however, participants in the negative ABS condition showed significantly slower SSE times compared to both the control group (t = 7.91, p < .001) and the positive ABS group (t = 10.76, p < .001). No significant difference emerged between the positive ABS and control groups (p = .08). Within-group comparisons indicated that SSE times increased significantly from T1 to T2 in the negative ABS group (t = 11.75, p < .001) and decreased in the positive ABS group (t = 3.81, p = .005), whereas the control group showed no significant change (see Fig. 2).
Stroop reaction times followed a similar pattern. At T2, negative ABS participants responded significantly slower than both the control (Mean Difference = 311.29, SE = 39.01, t = 7.98, p < .001) and positive ABS groups (Mean Difference = 381.88, SE = 39.01, t = 9.79, p < .001). In contrast, no difference was observed between the positive ABS and control groups (p > .05). Within-group analyses confirmed that Stroop RT increased from T1 to T2 under negative ABS (t = 10.48, p < .001) and decreased under positive ABS (t = 3.37, p = .02).
Mediation Analysis
Mediation analyses tested whether Stroop RT at T2 mediated the effect of ABS activation on SSE performance at T2. The results showed that negative ABS predicted longer Stroop RT (Path a: B = –190.94, p < .001), which, in turn, predicted slower SSE times (Path b: B = –0.08, p = .01). The direct effect of ABS on SSE time remained significant when controlling for Stroop RT (Path cʹ: B = –36.04, p < .001), indicating partial mediation. The Sobel test (z = 2.46, p = .01) and bootstrap analyses (5,000 resamples) confirmed the significance of the indirect effect (B = –15.99, 95% BCa CI [–30.05, –2.53]; see Fig. 3).
Overall, the results indicated that age-based stereotypes can alter functional balance and cognitive control in older women, with partial mediation by the depletion of cognitive control resources, thereby underscoring the cognitive mechanisms that underlie stereotype-related declines in functional balance.

Fig 2. Mean functional balance time at pretest (T1) and post ABS activation (T2).
Note. Lower values indicate better functional balance. Error bars represent ±1 standard error of the mean (SE).
✶✶✶p <.001 for between-group differences at T2; ……p <.01 and ………p <.001 for significant changes from T1 to T2.
Stroop reaction times followed a similar pattern. At T2, negative ABS participants responded significantly slower than both the control (Mean Difference = 311.29, SE = 39.01, t = 7.98, p <.001) and positive ABS groups (Mean Difference = 381.88, SE = 39.01, t = 9.79, p <.001). In contrast, no difference was observed between the positive ABS and control groups (p >.05). Within-group analyses confirmed that Stroop RT increased from T1 to T2 under negative ABS (t = 10.48, p <.001) and decreased under positive ABS (t = 3.37, p =.02).
Mediation Analysis
Mediation analyses tested whether Stroop RT at T2 mediated the effect of ABS activation on SSE performance at T2. The results showed that negative ABS predicted longer Stroop RT (Path a: B = –190.94, p <.001), which, in turn, predicted slower SSE times (Path b: B = –0.08, p =.01). The direct effect of ABS on SSE time remained significant when controlling for Stroop RT (Path cʹ: B = –36.04, p <.001), indicating partial mediation. The Sobel test (z = 2.46, p =.01) and bootstrap analyses (5,000 resamples) confirmed the significance of the indirect effect (B = –15.99, 95% BCa CI [–30.05, –2.53]; see Fig. 3).


Fig 3. Mediation model depicting the effect of ABS activation (X) on functional balance time (Y), with Stroop reaction time (Stroop-RT) as the mediator (M).
Note. ABS was coded as follows: negative = −1, control = 0, positive = +1. Path coefficients reflect unstandardized regression weights; standard errors are shown in parentheses. **p <.001, *p <.01

Overall, the results indicated that age-based stereotypes can alter functional balance and cognitive control in older women, with partial mediation by the depletion of cognitive control resources, thereby underscoring the cognitive mechanisms that underlie stereotype-related declines in functional balance.
Conclusion
The present findings highlight the central role of age-based stereotypes in shaping functional balance through their impact on cognitive control processes. Rather than reflecting purely biomechanical decline, the observed balance impairments under negative stereotype activation appear to stem from increased cognitive and emotional load. Consistent with self-control and stereotype threat frameworks, negative age cues likely intensified self-monitoring and evaluative concern, thereby diverting limited cognitive resources away from the coordination and planning demands of complex gait. This interpretation is supported by the mediating role of Stroop reaction time, suggesting that depletion of cognitive control constitutes a key mechanism linking stereotype threat to motor instability. Conversely, positive stereotype activation may have reduced perceived task threat and freed regulatory resources, allowing more automatic and efficient motor execution. The fact that stereotype effects emerged primarily in a cognitively demanding stepping task further underscores the importance of task complexity in revealing stereotype-related motor costs. Collectively, these findings suggest that age-related motor vulnerability is not fixed but context-sensitive, and that modifying the evaluative climate may represent a powerful yet underutilized avenue for preserving balance and mobility in older adulthood.
Article Message
This study demonstrates that age-related attitudes extend beyond social beliefs to directly influence cognitive efficiency and motor performance in older adults. Negative attitudes appear to deplete cognitive resources and disrupt balance control, whereas positive attitudes facilitate both cognitive and motor functioning. These findings underscore the significance of supportive environments, age-appropriate messaging, and age-sensitive educational and rehabilitative interventions. Critically, the results suggest that fostering positive beliefs about aging may reduce cognitive–motor vulnerability and promote a more confident and adaptive aging experience.
Ethical Considerations
The Ethics Committee of the University of Isfahan approved the study protocol. https://ethics.research.ac.ir/form/ker6pgt1l9a2eed9.pdf
Authors' Contributions

Literature review: Zakieh Alinaghipour, Hamid Salehi, and Seyyed Mohammad Reza Mousavi
Project manager: Hamid Salehi
Ideation: Hamid Salehi
Data collection: Zakieh Alinaghipour
Data analysis: Zakieh Alinaghipour, Hamid Salehi
Initial writing: Zakieh Alinaghipour, Hamid Salehi
Final review and editing: Zakieh Alinaghipour, Hamid Salehi, and Seyyed Mohammad Reza Mousavi
Literature review: Zakieh Alinaghipour, Hamid Salehi, and Seyyed Mohammad Reza Mousavi
Project management: Hamid Salehi

Conflicts of Interest
The authors report no potential conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgement
The authors express their sincere gratitude to the older people of Mohammad Amin Charity in Isfahan who voluntarily participated in this study.

Keywords

Subjects

1. Van Kan GA, Rolland Y, Andrieu S, Bauer J, Beauchet O, Bonnefoy M, et al. Gait speed at usual pace as a predictor of adverse outcomes in community-dwelling older people an international academy on nutrition and aging (IANA) task force. The Journal of nutrition, health and aging. 2009;13(10):881–9.
2.   World Health Organization (WHO). Global report on ageism: World Health Organisation. Available online at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/global-report-on-ageism (accessed October 19, 2021). 2021.
3.   Barber SJ. The applied implications of age-based stereotype threat for older adults. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 2020;9(3):274–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.05.002
4.   Lamont RA, Swift HJ, Drury L. Understanding perceived age-based judgement as a precursor to age-based stereotype threat in everyday settings. Frontiers in Psychology (section Organizational Psychology). 2021;12:640567. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.640567
5.   Kang H, Kim H. Ageism and psychological well-being among older adults: A systematic review. Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2022;8:23337214221087023. https://doi.org/10.1177/23337214221087023
6.   Lamont RA, Swift HJ, Abrams D. A review and meta-analysis of age-based stereotype threat: Negative stereotypes, not facts, do the damage. Psychology and Aging. 2015;30(1):180–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038586
7.   Swift HJ, Lamont RA, Abrams D. Are they half as strong as they used to be? An experiment testing whether age-related social comparisons impair older people's hand grip strength and persistence. BMJ Open. 2012;2(3):e001064. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001064
8.   Hausdorff JM, Levy BR, Wei JY. The power of ageism on physical function of older persons: Reversibility of age-related gait changes. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999;47(11):1346–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb07437.x
9.   Chalabaev A, Palluel E, Ruchaud F. “The threat is in the head, not in the legs”: Activating negative age stereotypes generates extra cognitive load during walking. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2020;51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2020.101740
10. Robertson DA, Savva GM, King-Kallimanis BL, Kenny RA. Negative perceptions of aging and decline in walking speed: A self-fulfilling prophecy. PLOS ONE. 2015;10(4):e0123260. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123260
11. Borel L, Alescio-Lautier B, Leonard J, Regner I. Age-based stereotype threat effects on dynamic balance in healthy older adults. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience. 2024;18:1309158. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2024.1309158
12. Müller AC, Kornadt AE, Notthoff N. Impact of age-related stereotype threat on subjective age, awareness of age-related change, and physical performance in older adults. European Journal of Ageing. 2025;22(1):46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-025-00874-w
13. Marquet M, Boutaayamou M, Schwartz C, Locquet M, Bruyère O, Croisier J-L, et al. Does negative information about aging influence older adults’ physical performance and subjective age? Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics. 2018;78:181–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2018.06.013
14. Barber SJ, Mather M. Stereotype threat in older adults: When and why does it occur and who is most affected? In: Verhaeghen P, Hertzog C, editors. The oxford handbook of emotion, social cognition, and problem solving in adulthood: Oxford University Press; 2014. p. 302–19.
15. Schmader T, Johns M, Forbes C. An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. Psychological Review. 2008;115(2):336–56. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.336
16. Inzlicht M, Kang SK. Stereotype threat spillover: How coping with threats to social identity affects aggression, eating, decision making, and attention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2010;99(3):467–81. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018951
17. Baumeister RF, Bratslavsky E, Muraven M, Tice DM. Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? Self-regulation and self-control: Routledge; 2018. p. 16–44.
18. Beilock SL, Carr TH. On the fragility of skilled performance: What governs choking under pressure? Journal of experimental psychology: General. 2001;130(4):701–25. https://doi.org/10.1110.1037//0096-3445.130.4.701
19. Beilock SL, Jellison WA, Rydell RJ, McConnell AR, Carr TH. On the causal mechanisms of stereotype threat: Can skills that don't rely heavily on working memory still be threatened? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2006;32(8):1059–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206288489
20. Emile M, d'Arripe-Longueville F, Cheval B, Amato M, Chalabaev A. An ego depletion account of aging stereotypes' effects on health-related variables. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2015;70(6):876–85. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbu168
21. Shigematsu R, Okura T. A novel exercise for improving lower-extremity functional fitness in the elderly. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research. 2006;18:242–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324655
22. Khalaji Z, Salehi H, Nezakat Alhosseini M, Lewthwaite R, Wulf G. A clinical examination of optimal theory application in people with multiple sclerosis: A proof-of-concept study and implications for rehabilitation practice. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research. 2024;48(1):18–24. https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000653
23. Hess TM, Hinson JT, Hodges EA. Moderators of and mechanisms underlying stereotype threat effects on older adults' memory performance. Experimental Aging Research. 2009;35(2):153–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610730802716413
24. Nasreddine Z, Phillips N, Bédirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, et al. The montreal cognitive assessment, moca: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2005;53:695–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x
25. Khalaji Z, Nezakat Alhosseini M, Safavi Hamami S, Iwatsuki T, Wulf G. Optimizing motor learning in older adults. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B. 2024;79(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbad120
26. Muraven M, Baumeister RF. Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle? Psychological bulletin. 2000;126(2):247.
27. Inzlicht M, McKay L, Aronson J. Stigma as ego depletion: How being the target of prejudice affects self-control. Psychological science. 2006;17(3):262–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01695.x
28. Stroop JR. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1935;18(6):643–62. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054651
29. Scarpina F, Tagini S. The stroop color and word test. Frontiers in Psychology. 2017;8:557. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00557
30. Sexton E, King-Kallimanis BL, Morgan K, McGee H. Development of the brief ageing perceptions questionnaire (b-apq): A confirmatory factor analysis approach to item reduction. BMC Geriatrics. 2014;14(1):44.
31. Miremadi M, Bandari R, Heravi-Karimooi M, Rejeh N, Sharif Nia H, Montazeri A. The persian short form aging perceptions questionnaire (apq-p): A validation study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020;18(1):7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1259-x
32. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY, US: W. H. Freeman & Company; 1997.
33. Deci EL, Ryan RM. Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne. 2008;49(3):182–5. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801
34. Eccles JS, Wigfield A. From expectancy-value theory to situated expectancy-value theory: A developmental, social cognitive, and sociocultural perspective on motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 2020;61:101859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101859
35. Barber SJ, Hamel K, Ketcham C, Lui K, Taylor-Ketcham N. The effects of stereotype threat on older adults' walking performance as a function of task difficulty and resource evaluations. Psychology and Aging. 2020;35(2):250–66. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000440
36. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986;51(6):1173–82. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173
37. Hayes AF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. 3rd ed. New York, London: The Guilford Press; 2022.
38. Hess TM, Auman C, Colcombe SJ, Rahhal TA. The impact of stereotype threat on age differences in memory performance. The Journals of Gerontology Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences. 2003;58(1):3–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/58.1.p3
39. Hess TM, Hinson JT. Age-related variation in the influences of aging stereotypes on memory in adulthood. Psychology and Aging. 2006;21(3):621–5. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.21.3.621
40. Chasteen AL, Bhattacharyya S, Horhota M, Tam R, Hasher L. How feelings of stereotype threat influence older adults' memory performance. Experimental Aging Research. 2005;31(3):235–60.
41. Hess TM, Hinson JT, Statham JA. Explicit and implicit stereotype activation effects on memory: Do age and awareness moderate the impact of priming? Psychology and Aging. 2004;19(3):495.
42. Levy BR. Mind matters: Cognitive and physical effects of aging self-stereotypes. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B. 2003;58(4):P203–P11. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/58.4.P203
43. Mazerolle M, Régner I, Morisset P, Rigalleau F, Huguet P. Stereotype threat strengthens automatic recall and undermines controlled processes in older adults. Psychological Science. 2012;23(7):723–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612437607
44. Levy BR, Pilver C, Chung PH, Slade MD. Subliminal strengthening: Improving older individuals’ physical function over time with an implicit-age-stereotype intervention. Psychological Science. 2014;25(12):2127–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614551970
45. Muir SW, Gopaul K, Montero Odasso MM. The role of cognitive impairment in fall risk among older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Age and Ageing. 2012;41(3):299–308.
46.  Rothermund K, de Paula Couto MCP. Age stereotypes: Dimensions, origins, and consequences. Current Opinion in Psychology. 2024;55:101747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101747     
47. Steele CM. A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist. 1997;52(6):613–29.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.6.613

  • Receive Date 22 November 2025
  • Revise Date 08 January 2026
  • Accept Date 26 January 2026