نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار رفتار حرکتی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران

2 کارشناس ارشد مهندسی پزشکی، دانشگاه صنعتی امیرکبیر

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر با هدف تعیین رابطة بین سطح هدایت الکتریکی پوست به‌عنوان شاخص انگیختگی و آهستگی بعد از خطا به‌عنوان شاخص نظارت بر عملکرد، در داوران فوتبال انجام شد. تعداد 43 داور بین سنین 20 تا 30 سال در این پژوهش شرکت کردند. سطح هدایت الکتریکی در حالت پایه و در حالت اجرای تکلیف سیمون ارزیابی شد. سپس، ویژگی‌های دقت عملکرد، زمان واکنش در پاسخ‌های صحیح، زمان واکنش در پاسخ‌های بعد از خطا و تفاضل زمان واکنش کوشش‌های بعد از خطا نسبت به کوشش‌های بعد از صحیح (آهستگی بعد از خطا)، به‌عنوان شاخص واکنش به خطا بررسی شدند. نتایج نشان داد که بین سطح هدایت الکتریکی، درصد پاسخ‌های صحیح و میانگین زمان واکنش رابطة معنا‌داری مشاهده نشد. همچنین، رابطة معنا‌داری بین سطح هدایت الکتریکی در حالت پایه با زمان واکنش در کوشش‌های بعد از خطا و آهستگی بعد از خطا مشاهده شد. این نتایج حاکی از وجود تفاوت‌های فردی در نظارت بر عملکرد است و براین‌اساس، واکنش داوران فوتبال به خطا از روی مقادیر سطح هدایت الکتریکی در حالت پایه قابل‌پیش‌بینی است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Relationship Between Skin Conductance and Post Error Slowing During Cognitive Task Performance in Soccer Referees

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Reza Ghasemian Moghadam 1
  • Mahnaz Ashegh Toosi 2

1 Assistant Professor of Motor Behavior, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran

2 M.Sc. of Biomedical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology

چکیده [English]

The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between skin conductance as an indicator of arousal state and post-error slowing as an indicator of performance monitoring in soccer referees. For this purpose, 43 referees aged 20-30 years participated in this study. The skin conductance was evaluated at the baseline and during the Simon task performance. Then, the performance accuracy, reaction time in correct trials, reaction time in post-error responses and difference of reaction time in post-error to post-correct trials (post-error slowing) as reaction to error were investigated. The results showed that there was not a significant relationship between skin conductance, correct responses percentage and mean reaction time. On the other hand, there was a significant relationship between the skin conductance level at the baseline and reaction time in the post-error trials and post-error slowing. These findings suggest individual differences in performance monitoring and, accordingly, the response of soccer referees to the error is predictable from the level of skin conductance at baseline.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Arousal
  • Performance Monitoring
  • Post-Error Slowing
  1. Fahimi F, VaezMousavi M. Physiological patterning of short badminton serve: A psychophysiological perspective to vigilance and arousal. World Appl Sci J. 2011; 12(3):347-53.
  2. Boucsein W. Electrodermal activity. New York: Springer Science & Business Media; 2012.
  3. Barry RJ, Clarke AR, McCarthy R, Selikowitz M, Rushby JA, Ploskova E. EEG differences in children as a function of resting-state arousal level. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;115(2):402-8.
  4. Barry RJ, Clarke AR, McCarthy R, Selikowitz M, Rushby JA. Arousal and activation in a continuous performance task. J Psychophysiol. 2005;19(2):91-9.
  5. VaezMousavi M, Barry RJ, Rushby J, Clarke A. Evidence for differentiation of arousal and activation in normal adults. 2007: Acta Neurobiol Exp, 67 (2), 179-86.
  6. Mundell C, Vielma JP, Zaman T. Predicting performance under stressful conditions using galvanic skin response. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 2016.
  7. Desmet C, Imbo I, De Brauwer J, Brass M, Fias W, Notebaert W. Error adaptation in mental arithmetic. Q J Exp Psychol. 2012;65(6):1059-67.
  8. Dutilh G, Vandekerckhove J, Forstmann BU, Keuleers E, Brysbaert M, Wagenmakers E-J. Testing theories of post-error slowing. ATTEN PERCEPT PSYCHO. 2012;74(2):454-65.
  9. núňez Castellar E, Kühn S, Fias W, Notebaert W. Outcome expectancy and not accuracy determines posterror slowing: ERP support. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2010;10(2):270-8.
  10. Cavanagh JF, Cohen MX, Allen JJ. Prelude to and resolution of an error: EEG phase synchrony reveals cognitive control dynamics during action monitoring. J Neurosci. 2009;29(1):98-105.
  11. Shi Y, Ruiz N, Taib R, Choi E, Chen F, editors. Galvanic skin response (GSR) as an index of cognitive load. CHI. 2007: 2651-6.
  12. Colzato LS, de Rover M, van den Wildenberg WP, Nieuwenhuis S. Genetic marker of norepinephrine synthesis predicts individual differences in post-error slowing: A pilot study. Neuropsychologia. 2013;51(13):2600-4.
  13. Dutilh G, van Ravenzwaaij D, Nieuwenhuis S, van der Maas HL, Forstmann BU, Wagenmakers E-J. How to measure post-error slowing: A confound and a simple solution. J Math Psychol. 2012;56(3):208-16.
  14. Steinborn MB, Flehmig HC, Bratzke D, Schröter H. Error reactivity in self-paced performance: Highly-accurate individuals exhibit largest post-error slowing. Q J Exp Psychol. 2012;65(4):624-31.
  15. Botvinick MM, Braver TS, Barch DM, Carter CS, Cohen JD. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychol. Rev. 2001;108(3):624-52.
  16. Danielmeier C, Ullsperger M. Post-error adjustments. Front. Psychol. 2011; 2:    233-43.
  17. Tops M, Boksem MA. Cortisol involvement in mechanisms of behavioral inhibition. Psychophysiology. 2011;48(5):723-32.
  18. Banks SJ, Eddy KT, Angstadt M, Nathan PJ, Phan KL. Amygdala–frontal connectivity during emotion regulation. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2007;2(4):    303-12.
  19. Wardle MC, Yang A, de Wit H. Effect of d-amphetamine on post-error slowing in healthy volunteers. Psychopharmacology. 2012;220(1):109-15.
  20. White CN, Ratcliff R, Vasey MW, McKoon G. Using diffusion models to understand clinical disorders. J Math Psychol. 2010;54(1):39-52.
  21. Van der Borght L, Braem S, Stevens M, Notebaert W. Keep calm and be patient: The influence of anxiety and time on post-error adaptations. Acta Psychol. 2016;164:34-8.
  22. Boksem MA, Tops M, Kostermans E, De Cremer D. Sensitivity to punishment and reward omission: evidence from error-related ERP components. BIOL PSYCHOL. 2008;79(2):185-92.
  23. Vestberg T, Gustafson R, Maurex L, Ingvar M, Petrovic P. Executive functions predict the success of top-soccer players. PloS one. 2012;7(4): e34731.