رفتار حرکتی

تعیین روایی و پایایی آزمون اولریخ ـ سه (TGMD-3) با حمایت بینایی در پسران با اختلال اتیسم

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار روان‌شناسی بالینی، دانشگاه شهید مدنی آذربایجان، تبریز، ایران

2 استادیار رفتارحرکتی، دانشگاه ارومیه، ارومیه، ایران

3 دانشجوی دکترای رفتار حرکتی، دانشگاه ارومیه، ارومیه، ایران

4 دکترای رفتار حرکتی، دانشگاه ارومیه، ارومیه، ایران

چکیده
آزمون رشد حرکتی درشت نسخة سه (اولریخ، 2016) برای طیف اتیسم همراه با حمایت بینایی پیشنهاد شده است که در مطالعة حاضر، هنجاریابی این آزمون در پسران سالم و در پسران با اختلال طیف اتیسم ارزیابی شد. پژوهش حاضر، توصیفی- هنجاری و طرح پژوهش، مقطعی و بالینی بود. نمونة آماری 160 پسر سه تا 10 سال شهر ارومیه با میانگین سنی 09/3 ± 73/7 بودند که 80 نفر با اختلال اتیسم و 80 نفر سالم و بدون اختلال یا بدون تأخیر رشدی- حرکتی بودند. ابزار جمع­آوری داده­ها، آزمون اولریخ- سه با حمایت بینایی بود که مهارت­های بنیادی کودکان را در دامنة سنی سه تا10 سال ارزیابی می­کند. آزمون شامل شش مهارت­ جابه‌جایی و هفت مهارت ­توپی بود. بررسی پایایی آزمون ازطریق آلفای کرونباخ، پایایی بین­ارزیاب، پایایی درون­ارزیاب و بازآزمایی نشان داد که آزمون اولریخ- سه در پسران سالم و اولریخ- سه با حمایت بینایی در کودکان با اختلال اتیسم ابزاری پایا است. روایی آزمون نیز ازطریق مقایسة نمره‌های کودکان سالم و کودکان با اختلال اتیسم و بررسی همبستگی سن با عملکرد حرکتی درشت ارزیابی شد. کودکان سالم در عملکرد حرکتی نسبت به کودکان با اختلال اتیسم برتری داشتند و عملکرد حرکتی کودکان با اختلال اتیسم با حمایت بینایی نسبت به آزمون بدون حمایت بینایی، بهبود داشت. ارتباط بین سن و خرده­مقیاس جابه‌جایی، مهارت­ توپی و نمرة کل در کودکان با اختلال اتیسم و سالم تأیید شد و در خرده­مقیاس جابه‌جایی در آزمون با حمایت بینایی بسیار کم بود. آزمون رشد حرکتی درشت نسخة سه، به‌عنوان آزمونی روا و پایا در کودکان سالم و در کودکان با اختلال اتیسم در بازة سنی سه تا 10 سال اعتبار و اطمینان ارزیابی را دارد و می‌تواند استفاده شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

The Validity and Reliability of Ulrich – 3rd (TGMD-3) with Visual Support among Autism Boys

نویسندگان English

  • Mehran Soleymani 1
  • Jalal Dehghani Zadeh 2
  • Elham Daneshyar 3
  • Parisa Parsafar 4
1 Assistant Professor of Clinical Psychology, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran
2 Assistant Professor of Motor Behavior, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran
3 Ph.D. Student in Motor Behavior, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran
4 Ph.D. in Motor Behavior, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran
چکیده English

The Test of Gross Motor Development – 3rd Edition (Ulrich, 2016) has been suggested in the autism spectrum with visual support, in this study, standardization in healthy boys and autism has been investigated. The strategy, design, and method of the research were descriptive-normative, cross-sectional and clinical. The samples of research were 160 children with an average age of 7.73 ± 3.09 from 3-10-year-old boys in Urmia that 80 boys with autism spectrum disorder and 80 boys were normal and had no disorder or developmental- delay. The data collection tool was TGMD-3 test with the visual support that evaluated children's fundamental skills in the age range of 3 to 10 years. This test consists of six locomotion and seven ball skills. The reliability of the test by Cronbach's alpha, the interrater reliability, the intrarater reliability, and the retest showed that the TGMD-3 test in healthy boys and TGMD-3 with vision support in children with autism is a lasting tool. The validity of the test was also evaluated by comparing the raw scores of healthy and autism children, confirmatory factor analysis and age correlation with the gross motor function of children. Healthy children had a significant superiority in motor function compared to children with autism, and the motor function of autism children with visual support was significantly improved compared with the test without visual support. Finally, the association between age and locomotion subtest, ball skill and the total raw score of both the autism and healthy children was confirmed and in locomotion subtest in the test with visual support was obtained at a very low level. The Test of Gross Motor Development – 3rd Edition as a valid and reliable test in healthy and autistic children in 3-10age range has the credibility and reliability of evaluation and use.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

  • Psychometric
  • Gross Motor Development Test
  • Autism
  • Visual Support
  1. Hartley S, Sikora D. Sex differences in autism spectrum disorder: An examination of developmental functioning, autistic symptoms, and coexisting behavior problems in toddlers. J Autism Dev Disord. 2009;39(12),1715-22.
  2. Fombonne E. Epidemiological surveys of autism and other pervasive developmental disorders: an update. J Autism Dev Disord. 2003;33(4):365-82.
  3. Ahmadi SJ, Safari T, Hematian M, Khalili Z. Diagnostic guide to Gilam autism (Persian version). Isfahan: 2012: 20-35.
  4. Shahidi Zandi F, Golmohammadi B, Hakime A. The Effect of Progressive motor program on improving motor skills in children with autism.J Mot Learn Dev. 2015;7(3):343-57. (In Persian).
  5. Liu T, Breslin CM. The effect of a picture activity schedule on performance of the MABC–2 for children with autism spectrum disorder. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2013;84(2):  206-12.
  6. Lloyd M, MacDonald M, Lord C. Motor skills of toddlers with autism spectrum disorders. Autism. 2013;17(2):133-46.
  7. McCoy SM, Jakicic JM, Gibbs BB. Comparison of obesity, physical activity, and sedentary behaviors between adolescents with autism spectrum disorders and without. J Autism Dev Disord. 2016;46(7):2317-26.
  8. Soltanzadeh S, Shafaroudi N, Khalaf Beigi M, Eftekhari S. Effect of musical activity on participation of Tehran’s 6-12 years old Autistic children in formal & informal activities. J Rehabil Med. 2012;1(2):31-5. (In Persian).
  9. Bhat AN, Landa RJ, Galloway JC. Current perspectives on motor functioning in infants, children, and adults with autism spectrum disorders. PTJ. 2011;91(7):       1116-29.
  10. Green D, Charman T, Pickles A, Chandler S, Loucas T, Simonoff E, Baird G. Impairment in movement skills of children with autistic spectrum disorders.Dev Med Child Neural Suppl. 2009;51(4):311-6.
  11. Staples KL, Reid G. Fundamental movement skills and autism spectrum disorders.J Autism Dev Disord. 2010;40(2):209-17.
  12. Berkeley SL, Zittel LL, Pitney LV, Nichols SE. Locomotor and object control skills of children diagnosed with autism.Adapt Phys Activ Q. 2001;18(4):405-16.
  13. Breslin CM, Liu T. Do You Know What I'm Saying? Strategies to assess motor skills for children with autism spectrum disorder.J Phys Educ Recreat Dance. 2015;86(1):10-5.
  14. Bayley N. Bayley scales of infant and toddler development. 3rd ed Screening test Manual.Universidad presbiteriana Mackenzie. 2015: 1-39
  15. Bruininks RH. Bruininks-Oseretsky test of motor proficiency. Circle Pines, MN: AGS Publishing; 2005. p. 95-110
  16. Folio MR, Fewell RR. Peabody developmental motor scales: Examiner's manual. TX: PRO-ED. Adapt Phys Activ Q; 2000.
  17. Henderson SE, Sugden DA, Barnett AL. Movement assessment battery for children-2. Harcourt Assessment. 2007.
  18. Ulrich DA. TGMD 2–Test of gross motor development examiner’s manual. Austin TX: PRO-ED. 2000; p:2.
  19. Liu T, Hamilton M, Davis L, ElGarhy S. Gross motor performance by children with autism spectrum disorder and typically developing children on TGMD-2. J Child Adolesc Behav. 2014.
  20. Ulrich DA. Test of gross motor development (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed. 2016. Available at: http://www.kines.umich.edu/tgmd3. [cited 2017 Aug 15]
  21. Kim S, Kim MJ, Valentini NC, Clark JE. Validity and reliability of the TGMD-2 for South Korean children. Journal of Motor Behavior. 2014;46(5):351-6.
  22. Valentini NC. Validity and reliability of the TGMD-2 for Brazilian children. Journal of motor behavior. 2012;44(4):275-80.
  23. Houwen S, Hartman E, Jonker L, Visscher C. Reliability and validity of the TGMD-2 in primary-school-age children with visual impairments. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly. 2010;27(2):143-59.
  24. Dummer GM, Haubenstricker JL, Stewart DA. Motor skill performances of children who are deaf. Adapted physical activity quarterly. 1996;13(4):400-14.
  25. Simons J, Daly D, Theodorou F, Caron C, Simons J, Andoniadou E. Validity and reliability of the TGMD-2 in 7–10-year-old Flemish children with intellectual disability. Adapted physical activity quarterly. 2008;25(1):71-82.
  26. Yun J, Ulrich DA. Estimating measurement validity: A tutorial. Adapt Phys Activ Q. 2002;19(1):32-47.
  27. Mohammadi F, Bahram A, Khalaji H, Ghadiri F. The validity and reliability of test of gross motor development–3rd edition among 3-10 years old children in Ahvaz. Jundishapur Scientific Medical Journal. 2017;16(4):379-91. (In Persian).
  28. Allen KA, Bredero B, Van Damme T, Ulrich DA, Simons J. Test of gross motor development-3 (TGMD-3) with the use of visual supports for children with autism spectrum disorder: validity and reliability. J Autism dev disord. 2017;47(3):813-33.
  29. Cicchetti DV. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological assessment. 1994;6(4):284-90.
  30. Weir JP. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM.J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19(1):231-40.
  31. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates; 1988. p. 2.
  32. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Publications; 2015.  
  33. Breslin CM, Rudisill ME. The effect of visual supports on performance of the TGMD-2 for children with autism spectrum disorder. Adap Phys Activ Q.2011;28(4):342-53.
رفتار حرکتی
دوره 11، شماره 37
پاییز 1398
آبان 1398
صفحه 33-52

  • تاریخ دریافت 15 مرداد 1397
  • تاریخ بازنگری 03 آذر 1397
  • تاریخ پذیرش 04 آذر 1397

صفحه اصلی

داوران

ارسال مقاله

اصول اخلاقی

اخبار و اعلانات

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

تماس با ما