نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار رفتار حرکتی، پژوهشگاه علوم ورزشی، تهران، ایران

2 استادیار فیزیولوژی ورزشی، پژوهشگاه علوم ورزشی، تهران، ایران

3 دانشجوی دکترای رفتار حرکتی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران

4 مدیر داخلی نشریات، پژوهشگاه علوم ورزشی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

هدف از انجام مطالعۀ حاضر، تحلیل محتواى مقاله‌های نشریه‌های علمی-پژوهشى داخل کشور در حوزة رفتار حرکتی و روان‌شناسی ورزشی منتشرشده در سال‌هاى 1388 تا 1395 بود. پژوهش حاضر ازنوع کاربردى و روش پژوهش، تحلیل محتوا بود. در این مطالعه، درمجموع، 814 مقاله در شش نشریة مختلف بررسی شدند. پس از مراجعه به نسخة بایگانی شماره ‏های منتشرشده از نشریه‌ها و ورود داده ‏های کمّی خام در برگة کدگذاری، شاخص‏ های آماری توصیفی ازطریق نرم ‏افزار اس.پی.اس.اس. محاسبه شدند و جدول‏ های توزیع فراوانی تنظیم شدند. نتایج نشان داد که نشریة رفتار حرکتی با 28 درصد بیشترین تعداد و نشریة پژوهش‌نامة مدیریت ورزشی و رفتار حرکتی با 7/5 درصد کمترین مقاله‌ را داشتند. مشاهده شد که کمترین زمان پذیرش مقاله‌ها به نشریة مطالعات روان‌شناسی ورزشی با میانگین 227/2 ± 50/3 ماه مربوط بود. نویسندگان مرد با 9/70 درصد، نویسندگان دانشجوی دکتری با 8/11 درصد، نویسندگان با رتبۀ علمی استادیار با 5/20 درصد و نویسندگان گرایش رفتار حرکتی با 4/71 درصد، بیشتر نویسندگان مقاله‌ها بودند. همچنین، مشخص شد که عمدة مقاله‌ها با موضوع روان‌شناسی ورزشی و بعد از آن، با موضوع یادگیری حرکتی منتشر شده‌اند و به حیطة رشد و کنترل حرکتی کمتر پرداخته شده است. دراین‌میان، مقولة هیجان‌ها (3/13 درصد) بیشتر از سایر موارد موردتوجه پژوهشگران بود. در مقاله‌های موردبررسی، عمدة آزمودنی ­ها غیرورزشکار و ازنظر سطح مهارت، «مبتدی» بودند و فقط 2/7 درصد در دستة «نخبه» قرار داشتند. همچنین، بیشتر مقاله‌ها در حوزة «سلامت» انجام شده بودند. نمونه­های انسانی، جوان و سالم اغلب نمونة آماری مقاله‌ها را تشکیل می­دادند و فقط در 5/12 درصد از مقاله‌ها،آزمودنی‌ها مبتلابه کم‌توانی بودند. نتایج نشان داد که در مقاله‌ها از منابع انگلیسی بیشتر از منابع فارسی استفاده شده بود. همچنین، بیشترین خوداستنادی نشریه در نشریة رشد و یادگیری حرکتی- ورزشی (124 مورد) و بیشترین خوداستنادی نویسنده به نشریة رفتار حرکتی (146 مورد) مربوط بود. اغلب پژوهش‌ها ازنوع کاربردی بودند و از روش پژوهش نیمه‌تجربی استفاده شده بود. همچنین، مشخص شد که دانشگاه تهران با 477 مورد، بیشترین سهم از مقاله‌ها را دربین نهادهای علمی مشارکت‌کننده به‌خود اختصاص داده است.براساس یافته‏های پژوهش می‏توان نتیجه‏گیری کرد که با توجه به بی‌توجهی به جامعة سالمندان و افراد کم‌توان و همچنین، نبود توازن در مطالعات انجام‌شده در حیطه ‏های گوناگون رفتار حرکتی، تعیین اولویت‏ های پژوهشی براساس نیازسنجی در نشریه ­های مختلف و اطلاع‌رسانی به پژوهشگران می‌تواند گامی درجهت رفع کمبودها و خلأ­های علمی و پژوهشی باشد. کمبود پژوهش‌های کیفی، کمبود مشارکت علمی بین‌رشته‌ای دربین نویسندگان مقاله‌ها، سهم کم دانشیاران و استادان درزمینة تولید مقاله‌ها، تمایل اندک به انجام پژوهش درزمینة رشد و کنترل حرکتی و بهره­ گیری کم از گروه سنی کودک و سالمند به‌عنوان نمونة پژوهش، از نقاط‌ ضعف و محدودیت­ های مهم درخور اشاره هستند.

 

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Content Analysis and Comparison of Iranian Journals in Motor Behavior and Sport Psychology Domains

نویسندگان [English]

  • Malihe Naemi Kia 1
  • Amin Gholami 1
  • Masoomeh Helalizadeh 2
  • Saeid Ahar 3
  • Raziyeh Irani 4

1 Assistant Professor of Motor Behavior, Sport Sciences Research Institute, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of Exercise Physiology, Sport Sciences Research Institute, Tehran, Iran

3 Ph.D. Student in Motor Behavior, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran

4 Journal Managing Director, Sport Sciences Research Institute, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

The purpose of this study was to analyze the content of papers in scientific journals of motor behavior and sport psychology in Iran from 2009 to 2017. The present study was an applied research and content analysis method. In this study, a total of 814 papers have been reviewed in six different journals.For this purpose, content analysis was done quantitatively and in terms of subject matter dispersion. After referring to archived published journals and the entry of some raw data in the coding sheet, descriptive statistics were calculated using SPSS software and frequency distribution tables were created. The results showed that the Journal of Motor Behavior with the highest number 28% and the Journal of Sport Management Research and Motor Behavior 5.7% had the lowest number of papers. It was observed Sports Psychology Studies Journal had the shortest review processes3.50±2.227 months). The authors of the papers were mostly men 70.9% in PhD degree 11.8% with assistant professor position 20.5%, and motor behavior field 71.4%. We also found that most of the papers have been published in sport psychology domain and motor learning domain was in the second position. Less attention has been paid in paper publications to the motor and control development domains. Meanwhile, topic of emotion 13.3% was the most respected by researchers to study. In the reviewed papers, most of subjects were non-athlete and in terms of skill level they were beginner and only 7.2% were elite. Most of papers were about "health". The major statistical samples of the papers were human, young and healthy subjects, and only 12.5% of the subjects had disabilities. The results showed that English language references were used more than Persian sources in the papers. The highest self-citations of the journal were in the Journal of Motor Learning and development -Sport (124 self-citations) and the most self-citation of the author was related to the Journal of Motor Behavior (146 self-citations). Most researches were practical and used semi-experimental research method. It was also found that Tehran University (477 cases) has the largest share of papers among participating academic institutions. little attention has been paid to community of the elderly and the disables, as well as the imbalance of studies conducted in various areas of motor behavior, the identification of research priorities based on the need-assessment in various journals and informing researchers can be a step towards the elimination of scientific and research deficiencies. The lack of qualitative research, the lack of interdisciplinary studies, the low share of associate and full professors in paper publication, the low tendency for research work on motor control and development domains and low focus on children and the elderly as a research sample are some important weaknesses and limitations in reviewed papers.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Content Analysis
  • Scientific-Research Journal
  • Motor Behavior
  • Sport Psychology
1. Dennis AD. The impact of the open access movement on medical based scholarly publishing in Nigeria. First Monday. 2007;12(10): available online at: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1957/1834[accessed 20 July 2012].
2. Sarmadi A. Analyzing the content of articles published in the periodicals of scientific and research articles published by three types of medical sciences and health services centers of the provinces in 2002 [Master's thesis]. [Tehran]: Iran University of Medical Sciences; 2004. (In Persian).
3. Mohammadi M, Motaghi Dadgar A, Motaharinia I. Content analysis of articles Quarterly Journal of Philosophical and Theological Researches in the years 1378-1391. Quarterly Journal of Qom University. 2015;16(4):149-71. (In Persian).
4. Arjomand T. Periodicals management in the central libraries of the state universities of Iran. National Studies on Librarianship and Information Organization. 2004;15(3):79-98. (In Persian).
5. Abdolmajid AH. Compilations of library and information science in the Scientific-Research Journals of Persian Promotion in 1999-2003. A Citation, Information and Information. 1999;9:45-56. (In Persian).
6. Babalhavaeji F, Yazdianrad M. Content analysis of papers in specialized Journals of Library and Information Science regarding promotion of reading and children’s libraries during 1999-2008. journal of research on information science and public libraries. 2011;16(4):31-53. (In Persian).
7. Sharifi M, Mirdar S, Sunasgari B. Descriptive analysis of articles of Physical Education and Sport Sciences Journals in 1384-1388. Journal of Sport Management. 2012;4(12):61-85. (In Persian).
8. Bemanian MR, Yeganeh MA, Naderi SM. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of the fine arts magazine during the period of 12 years (Spring 1376 to Spring 1387). Journal of Fine Arts. 2008;35: 135-145. (In Persian).
9. Fereshtehnejad S, Motevalian S, Moradi Lakeh M, Aghili S, Shafiee Sabet A. Comparison of the qualitative and quantitative indexes of Scientific Medical Journals affiliated to Iran University of Medical Sciences with Iranian Exemplary Medical Journals during 2008-2010 Razi Journal of Medical Sciences) RJMS(. 2010;17(77):40-54. (In Persian).
10. Ziaie A, Elahi A, Bakhshteh Nia I. Content analysis of articles in Journal of Motion and Sports Sciences Kharazmi University. Communication Management in Sport Media. 2014;1(3):52-62. (In Persian).
11. Ghahnaviyeh H, Movahedi F, Yarmohamadian MH, Ajami S. Content and citation analysis of articles published in the Journal of Health Information Management. Health Information Management. 2011;1(8):82-92. (In Persian).
12. Sharifi V. Evaluation of the quality of papers. New Developments in Cognitive Science. 2003;5(4):92-94. (In Persian).
13. Smucker M, Grappendorf H. A content analysis of sport management faculty collaboration: Single versus multiple authorship. Sport Management and Related Topics Journal. 2008;4(2):47-57.
14. Amouzade S, Aghalari Z, Tirgar A. Determination of research bias based on the articles published in Health Management Journals. Journal of Health Research in Community (JHRC) 2017;3(1):69-76. (In Persian).
15. Ghasemi H, Nourbakhsh M, Tapeh Rashi G. Content analysis of Sport Management articles Journals.Jahesh Journal 2010;2(6): 17-24 (In Persian).
16. Horri A, Neshat N. Citation behavior of authors contained in the Journals Psychology and Educational Sciences Tehran University. Journal of Psychology and Educational Sciences Tehran University. 2002;32(2):1-33. (In Persian).
17. Haridasan S, Kulshrestha VK. Citation analysis of scholarly communication in the Journal Knowledge Organization. Library Review. 2007;56(4),299-310.
18. Mahram B, Tavanaei Shahroodi E. Content analysis of the scientific Journal of Psychological Research: Topic and research methods. Psychology Quarterly evolution: Iranian psychologists. 2009;6(22):106-19. (In Persian).
19. Eidy H, Abbasi H, Sajjadi N. Content analysis of the Journal of Oceanographic Research from No. 1-33. Paper presented at: Fifth Student Conference on Physical Education and Sport Sciences; 2007; Nov.Mazandaran University; Iran. (In Persian).
20. Taperashi G, Haghighi S, Abdolvahab Z. Content analysis of sports management articles in scientific magazines. Communication Management in Sport Media. 2013;1(1):53-60. (In Persian).
21. Mondello MJ, Pedersen PM. A content analysis of the Journal of Sports Economics. J Sports Eco. 2003;4(1):64-73.
22. Pitts B, Pedersen PM. Examining the body of knowledge in sport management: A content analysis of the Journal of Sport Management. Sport Management and Related Topics Journal, 2005; 2 (1), 33-52.
23. Smucker MI, Grappendorf HE. A content analysis of sport management faculty collaboration: Single versus multiple authorship. Sport Management and Related Topics Journal. 2004;75(4):47-57.
24. Asgari B, Ziaie A, Sosuddniani I. Citation analysis of Journal of Motion and Exercise Science, Communication Management in Sport Media. 2011;1(1):34-59. (In Persian).
25. Sajjadi SN, Eidi H, Mehrabani J, abbasi H. A descriptive analysis of Harakat Science-Research Journal. Vol. 1-34. Journal of Sport Management. 2010;2(5):141293. (In Persian).
26. Sajjadi S, Behnam M, Hashemi S, Bakhshandeh H, Ahmadi H. The evaluation of scientific-research articles on sports management in Iranian Professional Journals. World Applied Sciences Journal. 2013;28(11):1761-6. (In Persian).
27. Pitts B, Danylchuk K, Quarterman J, Cianfrone B. Examining the body of scholarship in sport management: A content analysis of the European Sport Management Quarterly. Sport Management International Journal. 2014;10(2):45-72.
28. Mehr News Agency. Tables of the ratio male and female s of teachers in the country. Tehran. Available at: https://www.mehrnews.com/news/3890596/ [cited 2017 Jan 29]
29. Tiew W. Journal Natural Rubber Research, 1987-19960: Bibliometric Study. Islamic Bulletin. 1998;43(2):49-57
30. Payne G, Isaacs L. Fundamental locomotion skills of childhood. Human motor development: A lifespan approach. 8th ed. New York: McGraw Hill; 2012. p. 352-81.
31. Ghazi Mirsaeid SJ, Motamedi N, Pahlavanzadeh B. A study of effect of author self-citation on impact factor in Iranian English Medical Journals in Web of Science and Islamic World Science Citation Center. Health Inf Manage. 2014;11(1):48.67-76.