رفتار حرکتی

مقایسة تأثیر آموزش غیرخطی بر ظهور الگوهای هماهنگی در سرویس بک‌هند کوتاه بدمینتون

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

سید کاظم موسوی 1
رسول یاعلی 2
عباس بهرام 3
علی عباسی 4

1 کارشناسی‌ارشد رفتار حرکتی، دانشگاه خوارزمی تهران

2 استادیار رفتار حرکتی، دانشگاه خوارزمی تهران

3 استاد رفتار حرکتی، دانشگاه خوارزمی تهران

4 استادیار بیومکانیک ورزشی، دانشگاه خوارزمی تهران

https://doi.org/10.22089/mbj.2018.5609.1654
چکیده
براساس نظریة پویایی‌های بوم‌شناختی و رویکرد غیرخطی برخاسته از آن، یادگیرنده باید برای کشف راه‌حل‌های حرکتی که متناسب خودش هستند، تشویق شود. هدف از انجام پژوهش حاضر، تعیین اثربخشی رویکرد آموزش غیرخطی بر یادگیری سرویس بک‌هندکوتاه بدمینتون است؛ براین‌اساس، 14 نفر به‌صورت تصادفی به دو گروه خطی و غیرخطی تقسیم شدند. رویکرد خطی را براساس دیدگاه سنتی و مرسوم و رویکرد غیرخطی را با بهره‌گیری از نظریة پویایی‌های بوم‌شناختی طرح‌ریزی و اجرا کردیم. متغیرهای دقت اجرا، الگوی معیار و متغیرهای کینماتیکی محاسبه شدند. یافته‌ها نشان داد که دقت اجرا و الگوی معیار بین هر دو گروه تفاوت معنادار نداشت، اما گروه غیرخطی خوشه‌های بیشتری را در هر دو مرحلة پس‌آزمون و یادداری نشان دادند که به معنی وجود دیجنریسی است. براساس یافته‌های پژوهش، رویکرد آموزش غیرخطی در رسیدن به نتایج تکلیف و خلق الگوهای حرکتی متنوع و متناسب با ویژگی‌های یادگیرندگان مؤثر است، اما ظهور الگوهای اختصاصی به عواملی چون ماهیت تکلیف، هدف و انگیزة یادگیرنده بستگی دارد؛ بنابراین، طراحی دقیق فراهم‌سازها می‌تواند نتایج بهتری را فراهم کند که برای یادگیرنده و تکلیف مناسب‌تر باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

پویایی‌های بوم‌شناختی
دیجنریسی
تغییرپذیری کارکردی

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Comparison of the Effect of Nonlinear Pedagogy on Emergence of Coordination Patterns in Low Badminton Backhand Serve

نویسندگان English

Seyed Kazem Mousavi 1
Rasoul Yaali 2
Abbas Bahram 3
Ali Abbasi 4
1 M.Sc. of Motor Behavior, Kharazmi University of Tehran
2 Assistant Professor of Motor Behavior, Kharazmi University of Tehran
3 Professor of Motor Behavior, Kharazmi University of Tehran
4 Assistant Professor of sport biomechanic, Kharazmi University of Tehran
چکیده English

Based on ecological dynamic theory and its nonlinear approach, a learner should be encouraged to explore various movement solutions to determine the most suitable for them. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a Nonlinear Pedagogy approach in the learning of low badminton backhand serve. A total of fourteen subjects were divided randomly into two groups. The Linear approach based on a traditional viewpoint and the Nonlinear Pedagogy approach based on the ecological dynamics theory were planned and conducted. Performance accuracy scores, movement criterion scores and kinematic data were measured. The findings showed that although the accuracy of the performance and the movement criterion between the two groups were insignificant, the nonlinear group showed more clusters in both the post-test and the retention, which indicates the presence of degeneracy. The results of this study indicate that although the nonlinear pedagogy approach is effective in achieving the results of the task and creating different movement patterns that are suitable to the characteristics of the learners, the emergence of specific patterns depend on factors such as the nature of the task, as well as the purpose and motivation of the learner. Therefore, the precise design of the affordances can provide better results that are more appropriate for the learner and the task.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Ecological dynamics
Degeneracy
Functional Variability
  1.  Crossman E. Theory of the acquisition of speed-skill. Ergonomics. 1959;2(2):153–66.
  2. Arazeshi N, Ghasemi A, Namazizadeh M, Sadeghi Damne E. Comparing exercise effects regarding learning in-phase and anti-phase movement coordination in arm and legs fall. Mot Behav. 2016;8(25):153–72. (In Persian).
  3. Button C, Chow J, Rein R. Exploring the perceptual-motor workspace: New approaches to skill acquisition and training. Routledge Handb Biomech Hum Mov Sci. 2008;2:538–53.
  4. Kelso, J. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns, the self-organization of brain and behavior. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
  5. Williams AM, Hodges NJ. Practice, instruction and skill acquisition in soccer: Challenging tradition. J Sports Sci. 2005;23(6):637–50.
  6. Farrow D, Reid M. The effect of equipment scaling on the skill acquisition of beginning tennis players. J Sports Sci. 2010;28(7):723–32.
  7. Beek P, Jacobs D, Daffertshofer A, Huys R. Expert performance in sport: Views from the joint perspectives of ecological psychology and dynamical systems theory. Expert Perform Sport Adv Res Sport Expert. 2003;5:321–44.
  8. Homayounnia M, Sheikh M, Hemayattalab R, Shahrbanian S. The effects of environmental affordances on perception of vision and balance in children with intellectual disability. Mot Behav. 2018;9(30):152–82. (In Persian).
  9. Kugler PN, Kelso JS, Turvey MT. On the concept of coordinative structures as dissipative structures: I. Theoretical lines of convergence. Tutorials Mot Behav. 1980;3:3–47.
  10. Warren WH. The dynamics of perception and action. sychological Rev. 2006;113(2):358-89.
  11. Lee MCY, Chow JY, Komar J, Tan CWK, Button C. Nonlinear pedagogy: An effective approach to cater for individual differences in learning a sports skill. PLoS One. 2014;9(8):1-13.
  12. Chow JY, Davids K, Hristovski R, Araújo D, Passos P. Nonlinear pedagogy: Learning design for self-organizing neurobiological systems. New Ideas Psychol. 2010;29(2):189–200.
  13. David’s KW, Button C, Bennett SJ. Dynamics of skill acquisition: A constraints-led approach. Hum Kinet. 2008;(4):186–200.
  14. Kelso JS. An essay on understanding the mind. Ecol Psychol. 2008;20(2):180–208.
  15. Moradi J., Vaez Mousavi S.M.K., Amirtash A.M. Interaction between individual, environment and task in motor learning: The effects of competitive atmosphere and mental toughness in learning two simple and complex sport skills. Mot Behav. 2017;9(27):85–104. (In Persian)
  16. Chow JY. Nonlinear learning underpinning pedagogy: Evidence, challenges, and implications. Quest. 2013;65(4):469–84.
  17. Edelman GM, Gally JA. Degeneracy and complexity in biological systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2001;98(24):13763–8.
  18. Pinder RA, Davids K, Renshaw I. Metastability and emergent performance of dynamic interceptive actions. J Sci Med Sport. 2012;15(5):437–43.
  19. Komar J, Chow J-Y, Chollet D, Seifert L. Neurobiological degeneracy: Supporting stability, flexibility and pluripotentiality in complex motor skill. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015;154:26–35.
  20. Seifert L, Button C, David’s K. Key properties of expert movement systems in sport. Sport Med. 2013;43(3):167–78.
  21. Tahmasebi Borojeni SH, Barani H, Hatami F, Shahmir E. The role of individual constraints, environment and homework in the accuracy of adaptive forecast scheduling. Mot lerning Dev. 2016;8(4):645–60. (In Persian).
  22. Shahabi Kaseb M, Sabzevari H, Vaeze Musavi M. The effect of various practical conditions (the interaction of organization and distribution of practice), individual characteristics and task difficulty level on determination of the amount of practice (repetition, passage of time) for acquisition of fin. Res Sport Manag Mot Behav. 2012;2(3):35–55. (In Persian).
  23. Chow JY, Davids K, Button C, Koh M. Coordination changes in a discrete multi-articular action as a function of practice. Acta Psychologica. 2008;127(1):163-76.
  24. Rein R, David’s K, Button C. Adaptive and phase transition behavior in performance of discrete multi-articular actions by degenerate neurobiological systems. Exp Brain Res. 2010;201(2):307–22.
  25. Rab G, Petuskey K, Bagley A. A method for determination of upper extremity kinematics. Gait Posture. 2002;15(2):113–9.
  26. Bouveyron, C., & Brunet-Saumard, C. Discriminative variable selection for clustering with the sparse Fisher-EM algorithm. Comput Stat. 2014;29(3):489–513.
  27.  Davids, K., Araújo, D., Hristovski, R., Passos, P., & Chow, J. Y. Ecological dynamics and motor learning design in sport. Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory and practice, (2012) ; 112-30.
  28. Komar J, Chow J-Y, Chollet D, Seifert L. Effect of analogy instructions with an internal focus on learning a complex motor skill. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. 2014;26(1):17-32.
  29. Turvey M, Shaw RE. Ecological foundations of cognition. I: Symmetry and specificity of animal-environment systems. J Conscious Stud. 1999;6(11):95–110.
  30. Chow JY, Davids K, Button C, Renshaw I. Nonlinear pedagogy in skill acquisition: An introduction. London: Routledge; 2015.
  31. Ranganathan R, Newell KM. Changing up the routine: Intervention-induced variability in motor learning. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2013;41(1):64–70.
  32. Kelso J. Phase transitions and critical behavior in human bimanual coordination. Am J Physiol Integr Comp Physiol. 1984;246(6):1000–4.
  33. Araújo D, Davids K. Talent development: From possessing gifts to functional environmental interactions. Talent Dev Excell. 2011;3(1):23–5.
  34. Mason PH. Degeneracy at multiple levels of complexity. Biol Theory. 2010;5(3):277–88. 
رفتار حرکتی
دوره 12، شماره 39
بهار 1399
فروردین 1399
صفحه 107-124

  • تاریخ دریافت 17 اسفند 1396
  • تاریخ بازنگری 30 تیر 1397
  • تاریخ پذیرش 13 مرداد 1397

صفحه اصلی

داوران

ارسال مقاله

اصول اخلاقی

اخبار و اعلانات

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

تماس با ما