نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

گروه تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

هدف کلی این تحقیق، بررسی تأثیر تمرین تکالیف بازنمایی شده بر مهارت های پیش بینی و تصمیم گیری در محیط آزمایشگاه بود. تعداد 58 شرکت کننده با دامنه سنی 08/3 ±22.00 سال و بر اساس معیارهای ورود، به صورت هدفمند و در پنج گروه (شناختی، شناختی- حرکتی، حرکتی، ورزشکار (ماهر) و کنترل) قرار گرفتند. برای ارزیابی اولیه آزمایشگاهی، از آزمون ویدئویی انسداد زمانی به منظور ارزیابی پیش بینی - تصمیم گیری که بر مبنای موقعیت های (مشاهده، ارزیابی وقایع، پیش گویی وقایع بعدی و برنامه ریزی اعمال پیش رو) طبقه بندی شد، استفاده گردید. دقت و کیفیت پیش بینی و تصمیم گیری طی گزارش کلامی ثبت شد. سپس آزمودنی های دو گروه شناختی و شناختی- حرکتی، 8 جلسه تمرین در محیط آزمایشگاه را پشت سر نهاده و در نهایت پس آزمونی برای تمامی گروه ها انجام گردید. فراوانی پاسخ های تاکتیکی صحیح برای هر موقعیت محاسبه و ارزیابی شد. داده ها با استفاده از آزمون تحلیل کوواریانس در نرم افزار SPSS نسخه 21 تحلیل شد. نتایج نشان داد که اثر گروه بر روی طراحی و برنامه‌ریزی برای تصمیم گیری معنی‌دار بود (11 0/0= p، 23 / 0= مجذور اتا، 68/3= (53،4)F ) و در این بین، گروه ورزشکار (ماهر) نسبت به گروه شناختی از مقادیر بالائی در این متغیر برخوردار بودند ( 05/0 p

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The effect of training representative tasks on perceptual-cognitive skills: Identifying involved mental processes

نویسندگان [English]

  • Parvaneh Alavinamvar
  • Mohammad Vaezmousavi
  • Mehdi Namazizadeh

1. Department of Physical Education & Sport Sciences. Central Tehran Branch. Islamic Azad University. Tehran. Iran.

چکیده [English]

The main purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of representative tasks on anticipation and decision - making skills in the laboratory environment. 58 participants with mean age 22. 30 ± 3.08 selected based on inclusion criteria and purposefully allocated in five groups (cognitive, cognitive-motor, motor, athlete (skilled) and control). A video-based temporal occlusion test was used to first assess the anticipatory and decision-making skills based on the situations (monitoring, evaluating events, predicting future events, and planning future actions). Cognitive and cognitive-motor groups experienced 8 session training in lab atmosphere, then all groups completed a post-test. Accuracy and quality of anticipation and decision-making was recorded during verbal reports. The frequencies of correct tactical responses were calculated and evaluated for each statement type. Data were analyzed using analysis of covariance in SPSS 21. The results showed that the effect of group on design and planning for decision making was significant (F (53,4)) = 3.68, P = 0.011, eta coefficient 0.23) and the athlete )skilled ( group had high values compared to the cognitive group in this variable (p

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • "Cognition"
  • "Anticipation"
  • "Decision-Making"
  • "Verbal reports"
  1. Williams AM, Ward P, Smeeton NJ, Allen D. Developing anticipation skills in tennis using on-court instruction: Perception versus perception and action. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. 2004;16(4):350-60.
  2. Williams AM, Ford PR. ‘Game intelligence’: anticipation and decision making. In: Science and soccer. New York: Routledge; 2013. pp. 117-133.
  3. Towhidkhah F, Moarghi Y, Lahimgarzade N. Human motor control. 1st Tehran: Amirkabir University Press; 2014. p. 281. (In Persian).
  4. Afonso J, Garganta J, Mesquita I. Decision-making in sports: the role of attention, anticipation and memory. Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance. 2012;14(5):592-601.
  5. Green CS, Bavelier D. The cognitive neuroscience of video games. Digital media: Transformations in human communication. 2006;1(1):211-23.
  6. Mori S, Ohtani Y, Imanaka K. Reaction times and anticipatory skills of karate athletes. Human Movement Science. 2002;21(2):213-30.
  7. Gabbett T, Rubinoff M, Thorburn L, Farrow D. Testing and training anticipation skills in softball fielders. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching. 2007;2(1):15-24.
  8. McPherson SL. Expert-novice differences in performance skills and problem representations of youth and adults during tennis competition. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 1999;70(3):233-51.
  9. Fontana FE. The effect of exercise intensity on decision making performance of experienced and inexperienced soccer players [Doctoral dissertation]. [Pennsylvania, United States]: University of Pittsburgh;2007.
  10. Williams AM, Ericsson KA. Perceptual-cognitive expertise in sport: Some considerations when applying the expert performance approach. Human Movement Science. 2005;24(3):283-307.
  11. Pruna R, Clos E, Bahdur K, Artells R. Journal of Novel Physiotherapies. population. 2017; 10:13.
  12. Ericsson KA, Simon HA. Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review. 1980;87(3):215.
  13. Petiot GH, Aquino R, Cardoso F, Santos R, Teoldo I. What mental process favours quality decision-making in young soccer players? Motriz: Revista de Educação Física. 2017;23(3): .
  14. Ward P, Williams AM, Ericsson KA. Underlying mechanisms of perceptual-cognitive expertise in soccer. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology. 2003;25:S136-S136).

 

  1. Pinder RA, Davids K, Renshaw I, Araújo D. Representative learning design and functionality of research and practice in sport. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2011;33(1):146-55.
  2. Williams AM. Advance cue utilization in soccer. Science and football II. 1993:284-90.
  3. Ross KG, Klein GA, Thunholm P, Schmitt JF, Baxter HC. The recognition-primed decision model. Military review. 2004 Jul;84(4):6-10.
  4. Fadde PJ. Interactive video training of perceptual decision making in the sport of baseball [PhD dissertation]. [West Lafayette]: Purdue University; 2002.
  5. Baker J, Côté J, Abernethy B. Learning from the experts: practice activities of expert decision makers in sport. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 2003;74(3):342-7
  6. Raab M. SMART-ER: a situation model of anticipated response consequences in tactical decisions in skill acquisition—extended and revised. Frontiers in Psychology. 2015; 5:1533.
  7. Rebetez C, Betrancourt M. Video game research in cognitive and educational sciences. Cognition, Brain, Behavior. 2007;11(1):131-42.
  8. Green CS, Bavelier D. The cognitive neuroscience of video games. Digital media: Transformations in human communication. 2006;1(1):211-23.
  9. Kretschmann R. Developing competencies by playing digital sports-games. US-China Education Review. 2010; 7:67-75.
  10. Renshaw I, Davids K, Araújo D, Lucas A, Roberts WM, Newcombe DJ, et al. Evaluating weaknesses of “perceptual-cognitive training” and “brain training” methods in sport: an ecological dynamics critique. Frontiers in Psychology. 2019; 9:2468.
  11. Chisholm JD, Chapman CS, Amm M, Bischof WF, Smilek D, Kingstone A. A cognitive ethology study of first-and third-person perspectives. PloS one. 2014 Mar 26;9(3): e92696
  12. Vaeyens R, Lenoir M, Williams AM, Philippaerts RM. Mechanisms underpinning successful decision making in skilled youth soccer players: an analysis of visual search behaviors. Journal of Motor Behavior. 2007;39(5):395-408
  13. Roca A, Williams AM. Does decision making transfer across similar and dissimilar sports? Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2017; 31:40-3

 

  1. Vestberg T, Gustafson R, Maurex L, Ingvar M, Petrovic P. Executive functions predict the success of top-soccer players. PloS One. 2012;7(4):e34731.
  2. Williams AM, Davids K, Burwitz L, Williams JG. Visual search strategies in experienced and inexperienced soccer players. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 1994;65(2):127-35.
  3. Williams AM, Davids K, Williams JG. Visual perception and action in sport: Taylor and Francis; 2005.
  4. Starkes J, Ericsson KA, editors. Export performance in sport: advances in research   on sport expertise. Chicago: Champaign, IL; 2003. pp. 316-7. 
  5. Roca A, Ford PR, McRobert AP, Williams AM. Identifying the processes underpinning anticipation and decision-making in a dynamic time-constrained task. Cognitive Processing. 2011;12(3):301-10.
  6. Roca A, Ford PR, Williams AM. The processes underlying" game intelligence" skills in soccer players. In: Science and football VII: The Proceedings of the Seventh World Congress on Science and Football. London: Routledge; 2013. pp. 255-60).
  7. Levi HR, Jackson RC. Contextual factors influencing decision making: perceptions of professional soccer players. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2018; 37:19-25.
  8. Natsuhara T, Kato T, Nakayama M, Yoshida T, Sasaki R, Matsutake T, Asai T. Decision-making while passing and visual search strategy during ball receiving in team sport play. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2020:0031512519900057.
  9. Roca A, Ford PR, Memmert D. Perceptual-cognitive processes underlying creative expert performance in soccer. Psychological Research. 2021 Apr; 85:1146-55.
  10. Chase WG, Ericsson KA. Skilled memory. Cognitive skills and their acquisition. JR Anderson.
  11. North JS, Ward P, Ericsson A, Williams AM. Mechanisms underlying skilled anticipation and recognition in a dynamic and temporally constrained domain. Memory. 2011;19(2):155-68
  12. Chamberlain CJ, Coelho AJ. The perceptual side of action: Decision-making in sport. In Advances in psychology 1993 Jan 1 (Vol. 102, pp. 135-157). North-Holland.
  13. Romeas T, Guldner A, Faubert J. 3D-multiple object tracking training task improves passing decision-making accuracy in soccer players. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2016; 22:1-9.