رفتار حرکتی

تأثیر بازخورد زیستی رسانایی پوست بر عملکرد تیراندازان ماهر

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری تخصصی رفتار حرکتی گرایش یادگیری حرکتی در دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکزی

2 دانشگاه جامع امام حسین (ع) تهران

چکیده
هدف از این پژوهش، مشاهده آثار ارایه بازخورد زیستی رسانایی پوست بر عملکرد تیراندازان ماهر بود. شرکت کنندگان، 10 تیرانداز داوطلب و ماهر رشته تفنگ بادی بودند که به تعداد مساوی در دو گروه تجربی و کنترل قرار گرفتند. گروه تجربی، پس از شرکت در پیش آزمون تیراندازی، در آموزش و تمرین بازخورد زیستی رسانایی پوست و نیز پنج جلسه تمرین تیراندازی همراه با دریافت بازخورد رسانایی پوست شرکت کرد. گروه کنترل پس از شرکت در پیش آزمون، تمرینات همیشگی خود را اجرا نمود. سپس هر دو گروه در پس آزمون تیراندازی و یک هفته بعد در آزمون انتقال شرکت کردند. نتایج آنالیز واریانس یک سویه نشان داد که، عملکرد تیراندازان گروه تجربی در پس آزمون و آزمون انتقال افزایش معناداری نسبت به پیش آزمون داشته است. همچنین نتایج آزمون ارزیابی استرس نشان داد که توانایی تعدیل انگیختگی تیراندازان گروه تجربی در انتهای دوره، نسبت به ابتدای آن، بهبود معناداری داشته است. به نظر می رسد، تمرین تیراندازی همراه با دریافت بازخورد رسانایی پوست موجب نوعی یادگیری در تنظیم انگیختگی قبل از هر شلیک و در نتیجه خود تنظیمی تیراندازان در ارایه پاسخ مناسب به انگیختگی شده، و نهایتاً عملکرد آن ها بهبود یافته است. به طور خلاصه، نتایج این تحقیق نشان داد که، عملکرد ورزشی از طریق دستگاری سطح انگیختگی و ارایه بازخورد افزوده زیستی بهبود می یابد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

The Effects of Skin Conductance Biofeedback on Elite Shooters’ Performance

نویسندگان English

  • Sayyed Hossein Hosseiny 1
  • Mohammad VaezMousavi 2
1 PhD student in motor behavior Behavior of motor learning in Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch
2 Professor, Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Imam Hossein University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of providing skin conductance (SC) biofeedback on the performance of elite rifle shooters. Volunteer participants (n=10) were divided into experimental and control groups (n=5, in each group). After pretest, the experimental group, was educated about SC biofeedback, then participated in five shooting practice sessions while receiving skin conductance feedback. The control group, performed five sessions of their regular exercise. Both groups then took part in the posttest and a week later in the transfer test. The results of one-way ANOVA showed that the performance of the experimental group in the posttest and in the transfer test significantly increased compared to the pretest. Also, the results showed that the ability to adjust the arousal level of the experimental group at the end of the intervention, significantly improved. It seems that shooting practice along with receiving SC feedback has led to the self-regulation of shooters in providing an appropriate response to arousal and thus improving performance. In summary, the results of this study showed that athletic performance is improved by stimulating arousal levels and providing biofeedback.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

  • arousal
  • stress
  • athletic performance
  • shooting
  • psycho-physiology
  1. Magill RA. Motor learning: concept and applications. MKVaez Musavi, M Shojaie (Persian translators). Tehran: Bamdadketab; 2005. p. 369. (in Persian).
  2. Schmidt RA, Timothy DL. Motor control and learning: a behavioral emphasis. R Hemayat Talab A Ghasemi (Persian translators). 4thTehran: Elm.va. Harekat; 2013. 632-636. (in Persian).
  3. Schmidt RA, Wrisberg CA. Motor learning and performance. M. Namazizadeh, MKVaez Musavi (Persian translators). 3rd Tehran: Samt; 2013. 468-476. (in Persian).
  4. Pusenjak N, Grad A, Tusak M, Leskovsek M, Schwarzlin R. Can biofeedback training of psychophysiological responses enhance athletes’ sport performance? A practitioner’s perspective. The Physician and Sports Medicine. 2015;43(3):287-299.
  5. Levy JJ, Baldwin DR. Psychophysiology and biofeedback of sport performance. In: APA handbook of sport and exercise psychology. American Psychological Association; 2019; Vol (1) Sport psychology. 745-758.  
  6. Pagaduan JC, Chen YS, Fell JW, Wu SSX. Can heart rate variability biofeedback improve athletic performance? A systematic review. Journal of Human Kinetics. 2020;73(1):103-114.
  7. Blumenstein B, Orbach I. Biofeedback for sport and performance enhancement. Oxford Handbook Topics in Psychology. 2014.
  8. Paul M, Garg K. The effect of heart rate variability biofeedback on performance psychology of basketball players. Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback. 2012;37(2):131-144.
  9. Ortega E, Wang CJK. Pre-performance physiological state: heart rate variability as a predictor of shooting performance. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback. 2018;43(1):75-85.
  10. Ceccarelli L, Strachan L. Biofeedback and physiological reactivity in high-performance athletes. Journal of Exercise, Movement, and Sport (SCAPPS refereed abstracts repository). 2016;48(1):72-72.
  11. Morgan SJ, Mora JAM. Effect of heart rate variability biofeedback on sport performance: a systematic review. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback. 2017;42(3):235-245.
  12. Scavone A, Kadziolka MJ, Miller CJ. State and trait mindfulness as predictors of skin conductance response to stress. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback. 2020; 45(33):221-228.
  13. Jafarova O, Mazhirina K, Sokhadze E, Shtark M. self-regulation strategies and heart rate biofeedback training. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback. 2020; 45(2):87-98.
  14. Nagai Y, Jones CI, Sen A. Galvanic skin response (GSR)/electrodermal/skin conductance biofeedback on epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neurol. 2019;10:377.
  15. Sandweiss JH, Wolf SL. eds. Biofeedback and Sports science. Cham: Springer Science & Business Media; 2013.
  16. Khazan IZ. The clinical handbook of biofeedback : a step by step guide for training and practice with mindfulness. M Rahmanian, E Asbaghi (Persian translators). Tehran: Arjmand; 2017. (in Persian).
  17. Sharma M, Kacker S, Sharma M. A brief introduction and review on galvanic skin response. Int J Med Res Prof. 2016;2(6):13-17.
  18. Barry RJ, Sokolov EN. Habituation of phasic and tonic components of the orienting reflex. Int J Psychophysiol. 1993;15:39-42.
  19. Boucsein, W., Fowles, D. C., Grimnes, S., Ben‐Shakhar, G., Roth, W. T., et al. Publication recommendations for electrodermal measurements. Psychophysiology. 2012;49(8):1017-1034.
  20. Strack, Benjamin, Michel Linden, Vietta sue wilson. Biofeedback & neurofeedback applications in sport psychology. A Hojjati, N Reza Soltani (Persian translators). Tehran: Danjeh; 2016. (in Persian).
  21. Beauchamp MK, Harvey RH, Beauchamp PH. An integrated biofeedback and psychological skills training program for Canada’s Olympic short-track speedskating team. Journal of clinical sport psychology, 2012;6(1):67-84.
  22. Harkness T. Psykinetics and biofeedback: Abhinav Bindra wins India's first-ever individual gold medal in Beijing Olympics. Biofeedback. 2009;37(2):48-52.
  23. Pop-Jordanova N, Demerdzieva A. Biofeedback training for peak performance in sport-case study. Macedonian journal of medical sciences. 2010;3(2):113-118.
  24. Koritnik T, Bajd T, Munih M. The effects of augmented auditory feedback on psychomotor skill learning in precision shooting. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology: JSEP. 2008;26(2):306–316.
  25. Weinberg RS, Gould D. Foundations of sport and exercise psychology. SM Vaez Mousavi, et al (Persian translators). Tehran: Hatmi; 2015. (in Persian).
  26. Zanevskyy I, Korostylova Y, Mykhaylov V. Specificity of shooting training with the optoelectronic target. Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics. 2009;11(4):63-70.
  27. Hosseiny SH, Ghasemi A, Shakeri N. Comparing the effects of internal, external and prefer focus of attention on the elite shooters’ performance. Adv Environ Biol. 2014;8(5)‏:1245-1250.
  28. Vaez Mousavi SM, Hashemi-Masoumi E, Jalali S. Arousal and activation in a sport shooting task‏. World Applied Sciences Journal. 2008;4(6):824-829.
  29. Svecova L, Vala D. Using electromyography for improving of training of sport shooting. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2016;49(25):541-545.
  30. Dupee M, Werthner P. Managing the stress response: the use of biofeedback and neurofeedback with Olympic athletes. Biofeedback. 2011;39(3):92-94.
  31. Perry FD, Shaw L, Zaichkowsky L. Biofeedback and neurofeedback in sports‏. Biofeedback. 2011;39(3):95-100.
  32. Paul M, Garg K, Sandhu JS. Role of biofeedback in optimizing psychomotor performance in sports. Asian journal of sports medicine. 2012;3(1):29.
  33. van Dooren M, Janssen JH. Emotional sweating across the body: comparing 16 different skin conductance measurement locations. Physiology & Behavior. 2012;106(2):298-304.
  34. Debra RJ, Christina WR. A multilevel approach to the study of motor control and learning. M Namazizadeh, S Jalali, Persian translators. Tehran: Nersi; 2013. (in Persian).
  35. Bazanova OM, Shtark Biofeedback in optimizing Psychomotor Reactivity: I. Comparison of biofeedback and common performance practice. Human Physiology. 2007;33(4):400–408.
رفتار حرکتی
دوره 14، شماره 48
تابستان 1401
تیر 1401
صفحه 109-136

  • تاریخ دریافت 11 مرداد 1399
  • تاریخ بازنگری 12 فروردین 1400
  • تاریخ پذیرش 09 اردیبهشت 1400

صفحه اصلی

داوران

ارسال مقاله

اصول اخلاقی

اخبار و اعلانات

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

تماس با ما