رفتار حرکتی

بررسی تشابه بازنمایی عمل در اجرای واقعی و مشاهده پرتاب آزاد بسکتبال در افراد ماهر و مبتدی: مطالعه کینماتیک و الگوی حرکات چشم

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 عضو هیات علمی پژوهشگاه تربیت بدنی

2 استادیار رفتار حرکتی- دانشگاه شیراز

3 گروه علوم رفتاری، شناختی و فناوری ورزش، دانشکده علوم ورزشی و تندرستی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

4 دکتری رفتار حرکتی دانشگاه تهران

چکیده
هدف تحقیق بررسی بازنمایی عمل در اجرای واقعی و مشاهده پرتاب آزاد بسکتبال در افراد ماهر و مبتدی بود. در این تحقیق شاخص‌های کینماتیک حرکتی در حین اجرا و الگوی حرکات چشم در دو حالت اجرای واقعی و مشاهده بررسی شد. 20 نفر شرکت‌کننده شامل 10 بازیکن بسکتبال ماهر و 10 نفر مبتدی در تحقیق حضور داشتند. طرح تحقیق در دو جلسه انجام شد. در جلسه اول افراد 10 پرتاب آزاد انجام داده و حرکات آن‌ها توسط سیستم آنالیز حرکت، حرکات چشم آن‌ها توسط دستگاه ردیاب بینایی پیوپیل و کل حرکت برای نمایش بعدی توسط دوربین قرار داده شده بر روی سر و دوربین بیرونی ثبت شد. در جلسه دوم افراد پس از نصب سیستم ردیابی بینایی فیلم ویرایش شده اجرای خود را از زاویه اول شخص و سوم شخص مشاهده ‌کردند و ثبت حرکات چشم صورت گرفت. پس از ثبت داده‌ها مقادیر دقت پرتاب، تغییرپذیری هماهنگی درون عضوی، سرعت مچ در لحظه پرتاب، جرک مچ دست، مدت زمان چشم ساکن، مدت زمان تثبیت‌ها و تعداد تثبیت‌ها محاسبه و با استفاده از آزمون‌های آماری t مستقل و تحلیل واریانس مرکب با اندازه‌گیری مکرر (3×2) و آزمون تعقیبی بونفرونی تحلیل شدند. تحلیل آماری با استفاده از نرم افزار SPSS 21 انجام شد و سطح معنی داری p≤0/05 درنظر گرفته شد. نتایج نشان داد که تغییرپذیری هماهنگی در افراد ماهر کمتر است و الگوی حرکات چشم نیز نه تنها در افراد ماهر و مبتدی متفاوت است بلکه در شرایط اجرای واقعی و مشاهده نیز متفاوت است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Investigating the similarity of action representation in real performance and observing basketball free throw in skilled and beginners: kinematic and eye movement pattern study

نویسندگان English

  • saleh rafiee 1
  • Davoud Fazeli 2
  • javad Riyahi 3
  • ayoub asadi 4
1 faculty member of SSRC
2 Assistant Professor of Motor Behavior- Shiraz University
3 Department of Cognitive and Behavioral Science and Technology in Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences and Health, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
4 Ph.D. of Motor Behavior, University of Tehran
چکیده English

The aim of the present study was to investigate the action representation in real performance and observing the basketball free throw in skilled and beginners. In this study, the kinematic parameters of movement during real performance and the eye movements pattern in both real and observation modes were studied. Twenty participants including 10 skilled basketball players and 10 beginners, participated in the study. The research design was conducted in two sessions. In the first session, the subjects performed 10 free throws and their movements were recorded by the motion analysis system, their eye movements were recorded by the pupil-based binocular eye trackers device, and the total movement were recorded for the next display by the camera placed on the head and the external camera. In the second session, after installing the eye tracker system, the individuals watched their performance from a first-person and third-person perspective, and eye movements were recorded. After recording the data, the values of throw accuracy, intra-limb coordination variability, wrist speed at the moment of throw, wrist jerk, quite eye duration, fixation time, and number of fixations were analyzed using independent t-test and two-way ANOVA with repeated measures (2 × 3) and Bonferroni post hoc test. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 21 software and a significance level of p≤0.05 was considered. The results showed that the coordination variability was less in skilled basketball players and the eye movement pattern is not only different in skilled and beginners but also in terms of actual performance and observation.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

  • Coordination variability
  • quiet eye duration
  • skill level
  • basketball free throw
  1. Bandura A. Social learning theory. Prentice-hall; 1977.
  2. Jeannerod, M. Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage. 2001;14: S103-9.
  3. Schack T. The cognitive architecture of complex movement. International journal of sport and exercise psychology. 2004 Jan 1;2(4):403-38.
  4. Rizzolatti G, Craighero L. The mirror-neuron system. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2004 Jul 21; 27:169-92.
  5. Wolpert DM, Doya K, Kawato M. A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. 2003 Mar 29;358(1431):593-602.
  6. Bird G, Osman M, Saggerson A, Heyes C. Sequence learning by action, observation and action observation. British journal of psychology. 2005 Aug;96(3):371-88.
  7. Wong L, Manson GA, Tremblay L, Welsh TN. On the relationship between the execution, perception, and imagination of action. Behavioural brain research. 2013 Nov 15;257:242-52.
  8. McCormick SA, Causer J, Holmes PS. Active vision during action execution, observation and imagery: evidence for shared motor representations. PLoS One. 2013 Jun 25;8(6): e67761.
  9. Kelly SW, Burton AM, Riedel B, Lynch E. Sequence learning by action and observation: Evidence for separate mechanisms. British journal of psychology. 2003 Aug;94(3):355-72.
  10. Hayes SJ, Andrew M, Elliott D, Roberts JW, Bennett SJ. Dissociable contributions of motor-execution and action-observation to intermanual transfer. Neuroscience Letters. 2012 Jan 11;506(2):346-50.
  11. Ong NT, Larssen BC, Hodges NJ. In the absence of physical practice, observation and imagery do not result in updating of internal models for aiming. Experimental brain research. 2012 Apr 1;218(1):9-19.
  12. Ghamari A, Sohrabi M, Kakhki AS. Effects of Physical and Observational Practice on Intermanual Transfer. Advances in Cognitive Psychology. 2019;15(1):21.
  13. McCormick SA, Causer J, Holmes PS. Active vision during action execution, observation and imagery: evidence for shared motor representations. PLoS One. 2013 Jun 25;8(6):e67761.
  14. Kim T, Frank C, Schack T. A systematic investigation of the effect of action observation training and motor imagery training on the development of mental representation structure and skill performance. Frontiers in human neuroscience. 2017 Oct 17;11:499.
  15. Davids K, Bennett S, Newell KM. Movement system variability. Human kinetics; 2006.
  16. Ranganathan R, Newell KM. Changing up the routine: intervention-induced variability in motor learning. Exercise and sport sciences reviews. 2013 Jan 1;41(1):64-70.
  17. Busquets A, Marina M, Davids K, Angulo-Barroso R. Differing roles of functional movement variability as experience increases in gymnastics. Journal of sports science & medicine. 2016 Jun;15(2):268.
  18. Chow JY, Davids K, Button C, Koh M. Coordination changes in a discrete multi-articular action as a function of practice. Acta psychologica. 2008 Jan 1;127(1):163-76.
  19. Wilson C, Simpson SE, Van Emmerik RE, Hamill J. Coordination variability and skill development in expert triple jumpers. Sports biomechanics. 2008 Jan 1;7(1):2-9.
  20. Vickers JN. Visual control when aiming at a far target. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and performance. 1996 Apr;22(2):342.
  21. Perez LM, Mendez RP, Manzano JA, Collado NR. Analysis of the visual behavior of taekwondists of different skills level. Revista Mexicana de Psicologia. 2013 Jan;30(1):32-40.
  22. Murray NP, Hunfalvay M. A comparison of visual search strategies of elite and non-elite tennis players through cluster analysis. Journal of sports sciences. 2017 Feb 1;35(3):241-6.
  23. Chia JS, Burns SF, Barrett LA, Chow JY. Increased complexities in visual search behavior in skilled players for a self-paced aiming task. Frontiers in psychology. 2017 Jun 14;8:987.
  24. Robins M, Davids K, Bartlett R, Wheat JS. Effects of attentional strategies, task expertise and anxiety on coordination of a discrete multi-articular action. InISBS-Conference Proceedings Archive 2007 Dec 12.
  25. Sidaway B, Heise G, SchoenfelderZohdi B. Quantifying the variability of angle-angle plots. Journal of Human Movement Studies. 1995 Jan 1;29(4):181-97.
  26. Lee MH, Newell KM. Visual feedback of hand trajectory and the development of infant prehension. Infant Behavior and Development. 2012 Apr 1;35(2):273-9.
  27. Schmidt RA, Zelaznik H, Hawkins B, Frank JS, Quinn Jr JT. Motor-output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. Psychological review. 1979 Sep;86(5):415.
  28. Sherwood DE. Effect of bandwidth knowledge of results on movement consistency. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1988 Apr;66(2):535-42.
  29. Sherwood DE, Schmidt RA. The relationship between force and force variability in minimal and near-maximal static and dynamic contractions. Journal of Motor Behavior. 1980 Mar 1;12(1):75-89.
  30. Newell, K.M. (1985). Coordination, control, and skill. In D. Goodman, R.B. Wilberg, & I.M. Franks (Eds.), Differing perspectives in motor learning, memory, and control. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  31. Broderick MP, Newell KM. Coordination patterns in ball bouncing as a function of skill. Journal of motor behavior. 1999 Jun 1;31(2):165-88.
  32. Button C, Macleod M, Sanders R, Coleman S. Examining movement variability in the basketball free-throw action at different skill levels. Research quarterly for exercise and sport. 2003 Sep 1;74(3):257-69.
  33. Latash ML. Fundamentals of motor control. Academic Press; 2012 Jul 16.
  34. Schorer J, Baker J, Fath F, Jaitner T. Identification of interindividual and intraindividual movement patterns in handball players of varying expertise levels. Journal of Motor Behavior. 2007 Sep 1;39(5):409-21.
  35. Fleisig G, Chu Y, Weber A, Andrews J. Variability in baseball pitching biomechanics among various levels of competition. Sports Biomechanics. 2009 Mar 1;8(1):10-21.
  36. Flanagan JR, Johansson RS. Action plans used in action observation. Nature. 2003 Aug;424(6950):769-71.
  37. Mattar AA, Gribble PL. Motor learning by observing. Neuron. 2005 Apr 7;46(1):153-60.
  38. Gruetzmacher N, Panzer S, Blandin Y, Shea CH. Observation and physical practice: Coding of simple motor sequences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2011 Jun;64(6):1111-23.
  39. Ellenbuerger T, Boutin A, Blandin Y, Shea CH, Panzer S. Scheduling observational and physical practice: Influence on the coding of simple motor sequences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2012 Jul;65(7):1260-73.
  40. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ. 1986;1986:23-8.
  41. Gibson JJ. The ecological approach to visual perception: classic edition. Psychology Press; 2014 Nov 20.
  42. Roberts JW, Bennett SJ, Elliott D, Hayes SJ. Top-down and bottom-up processes during observation: Implications for motor learning. European journal of sport science. 2014 Jan 1;14(sup1):S250-6.
  43. Afonso J, Mesquita I. Skill-based differences in visual search behaviours and verbal reports in a representative film-based task in volleyball. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport. 2013 Dec 1;13(3):669-77.
  44. Schack T, Frank C. Mental Representation and the Cognitive Architecture of Skilled Action. Review of Philosophy and Psychology. 2020 Jul 20:1-20.
  45. Schack T, Mechsner F. Representation of motor skills in human long-term memory. Neuroscience letters. 2006 Jan 2;391(3):77-81.
  46. Vine SJ, Wilson MR. The influence of quiet eye training and pressure on attention and visuo-motor control. Acta psychologica. 2011 Mar 1;136(3):340-6.
  47. Land MF. Vision, eye movements, and natural behavior. Visual neuroscience. 2009;26(1):51.
رفتار حرکتی
دوره 13، شماره 46
زمستان 1400
دی 1400
صفحه 17-44

  • تاریخ دریافت 14 آبان 1399
  • تاریخ بازنگری 11 اردیبهشت 1400
  • تاریخ پذیرش 15 اردیبهشت 1400

صفحه اصلی

داوران

ارسال مقاله

اصول اخلاقی

اخبار و اعلانات

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

تماس با ما