نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری یادگیری حرکتی دانشکده تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی دانشگاه تهران مربی / گروه علوم ورزشی دانشگاه قم

2 استادگروه،رفتارحرکتی و تحلیل ورزشی،دانشکده علوم ورزشی و تندرستی،تهران،ایران.

3 دانشیار گروه رفتار حرکتی و روان شناسی ورزشی، دانشکده تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

راهبردهای یادگیری شامل دو دسته کلی راهبردهای شناختی و راهبردهای فراشناختی می‌باشد. پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی تاثیر راهبردهای فراشناختی و بازی در خانه‌ (بسته پیشنهادی یونیسف) بر یادگیری مهارت‌های حرکتی بنیادی کودکان 5 تا 8 سال در همه‌گیری بیماری کرونا انجام گرفت. این پژوهش از نوع مداخله‌ای نیمه تجربی و از نظر طرح تحقیق، پیش‌آزمون و پس‌آزمون با گروه کنترل بود. شرکت کنندگان 84 کودک ساکن قم بودند که بصورت نمونه‌گیری در دسترس انتخاب و بصورت تصادفی در 6 گروه قرار گرفتند. گروه تمرین یونیسف، گروه تمرین یونیسف همراه با راهبردهای فراشناختی و گروه کنترل (در دو گروه سنی 6-5 سال و 8-7 سال). از آزمون ریون و نیویورک برای غربالگری شناختی و جسمانی استفاده گردید. از تمامی شرکت‌کنندگان پیش‌آزمون ارزیابی حرکتی کودکان- ویرایش دوم گرفته شد. مداخله شامل 18 جلسه انجام بازی‌های 4 گانه پیشنهادی یونیسف بود. گروه یونیسف پلاس این تمرینات را همراه با مصاحبه نیمه ساختار یافته‌ای که جهت تحریک فراشناخت بود، انجام می‌دادند. نتایج پس‌آزمون با روش تحلیل واریانس مرکب و آنکووا نشان داد که تمرینات یونیسف و یونیسف پلاس باعث بهبود مهارت‌های حرکتی بنیادی کودکان می‌شوند؛ اما تمرین یونیسف پلاس علیرغم اینکه در هر دو گروه سنی منجر به نتایج بهتری شده، اما این تفاوت معنی‌دار نمی‌باشد و به عبارتی تمرینات فراشناختی در این دو گروه سنی نتوانسته بهبود معنی‌داری ایجاد نماید. در کل می‌توان گفت تمرینات پیشنهادی یونیسف مفید بودند و ترکیب این تمرینات با راهبردهای فراشناختی باعث ارتقاء بیشتر حرکتی کودکان گردید.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The effect of metacognitive strategies and play at home (UNICEF Proposed Package) on learning fundamental motor skills in children aged 5 to 8 years in the pandemic of Corona disease

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ahmad Alimardani 1
  • mehdi shahbazi 2
  • Shahzad Tahmasebi Boroujeni 2
  • elahe arab ameri 3

1 PhD Student in Motor Learning, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, University of Tehran

2 Professor, Movement Behavior and Sports Analysis, Faculty of Sports and Health Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

3 Associate professor Department of Motor Behavior and Sport Psychology, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

Learning strategies include two general categories of cognitive strategies and metacognitive strategies. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of metacognitive strategies and play at home (UNICEF Proposed Package) on learning fundamental motor skills of children aged 5 to 8 in the pandemic of Corona disease. This study was a quasi-experimental intervention and in terms of research design, pre-test and post-test with the control group. Participants were 84 children living in Qom who were incidentaly selected and randomly divided into 6 groups. UNICEF Training Group, UNICEF Training Group with Metacognitive Strategies and Control Group (in the age groups of 5-6 years and 7-8 years). Raven and New York tests were used for cognitive and physical screening. Movement Assessment Battery for Children - Second Edition pre-test was taken from all participants. The intervention consisted of 18 sessions of UNICEF-recommended four games. The UNICEF Plus group conducted these exercises with a semi-structured interview to stimulate metacognition. The results of post-test with Mixed ANONA and ANKOVA showed that UNICEF and UNICEF Plus exercises improve children's fundamental motor skills; But despite the fact that UNICEF Plus training has led to better results in both age groups, this difference is not significant, and In other words, metacognitive exercises in these two age groups could not significantly improve. In general, it can be said that the exercises recommended by UNICEF were useful and the combination of these exercises with metacognitive strategies further improved children's motor skills.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • metacognitive strategies
  • fundamental motor skills
  • children
  • play
  • Corona disease
  1. Schmidt RA, Lee TD, Winstein C, Wulf G, Zelaznik HN. Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis: Human kinetics; 2018.
  2. Moshiri P, Rahavi R. [The effect of teaching metacognitive strategies on discrete skill learning (in persian)]. The Second National Conference on New Achievements in Physical Education and Sport; Chabahar International University2016.
  3. Settanni M, Magistro D, Rabaglietti E. Development and preliminary validation of an instrument to measure metacognitionapplied to physical activity during early adolescence. 2012.
  4. Muijs D, Bokhove C. Metacognition and Self-Regulation: Evidence Review. Education Endowment Foundation. 2020.
  5. Watson J. Metacognition and self-regulation- what is the difference and why should we care? 2017 [Available from: https://researchschool.org.uk/huntington/news/metacognition-and-self-regulation-what-is-the-difference-and-why-should-we-care/.
  6. Parviz K, Sharifi M. [Relationship between cognitive and metacognitive strategies and educational success in urban and rural high school students (in persian)]. Educ Strategy Med Sci. 2011;4(1):1-6.
  7. Hamedi S, Abdoli B, Farsi AR. [The Effect of Metacognitive Strategies and Observation of Skilled Model on Soccer Chip Task Learning (in persian)]. Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 2018;6(1).
  8. Cleary TJ, Zimmerman BJ, Keating T, sport. Training physical education students to self-regulate during basketball free throw practice. Research Quarterly for Exercise and sport. 2006;77(2):251-62.
  9. Asadollahi P, Salarifar MH, Talebzadah Shoshtari L. [The effectiveness of training metacognitive beliefs and state on elementary school students' working memory (in persian)]. Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 2021;9(3):51-70.
  10. Farsi AR, Marghzar M, Aslankhani MA. [The effect of self regulated and non regulated learning strategies on acquisition, retention and transfer of table tennis forehand drive skill (in persian)]. Journal of Motor Behavior and Sport Psychology. 2010;2(2):397-408.
  11. Jazini S, Lotfi GR, Namazizadeh M. [The effect of metacognitive skills training on archery learning (in persian)]. 4th international conference on sports sciences; iran, tehran2017.
  12. Rahavi R, Aslankhani MA, Abdoli B, Vahabzade A. [The effects of scheduled practices (self-regulated and non–self-regulated) on learning of simple and complex tracking tasks (in persian)]. journal of development and motor learning. 2009;1(2):65-85.
  13. Rahavi Ezabadi R, Fallah Yakhdani HR, Moshiri Sedeh P. [Comparing of self-regulated learning Strategies on the learning of volleyball service (in persian)]. motor behavior. 2017;9(28):155-72.
  14. Rahavi R, Shojaei M, Estiri Z, Naghizadeh H. [The effect of two types of interference before performance and during performance on learning of generalized motor program and parameter in basketball fundamental skills (in persian)]. journal of development and motor learning. 2013(12):107-24.
  15. Mohammed N, Kzar MH, Al-Selmi ADH. The effect of an educational curriculum based on metacognitive skills in teaching some offensive skills on the specialized school of basketball in Baghdad governorate. Revista iberoamericana de psicología del ejercicio y el deporte. 2021;16(3):4.
  16. Kolovelonis A, Goudas M, Hassandra M, Dermitzaki I. Self-regulated learning in physical education: Examining the effects of emulative and self-control practice. Psychology of sport and Exercise. 2012;13(4):383-9.
  17. Kolovelonis A, Goudas M, Dermitzaki I. The effect of different goals and self-recording on self-regulation of learning a motor skill in a physical education setting. Learning and Instruction. 2011;21(3):355-64.
  18. Kolovelonis A, Goudas M, Dermitzaki I. The effects of self-talk and goal setting on self-regulation of learning a new motor skill in physical education. International Journal of sport and exercise psychology. 2012;10(3):221-35.
  19. Ste-Marie DM, Vertes K, Rymal AM, Martini R. Feedforward self-modeling enhances skill acquisition in children learning trampoline skills. Frontiers in psychology. 2011; 2:155.
  20. Clark SE, Ste-Marie DM. The impact of self-as-a-model interventions on children's self-regulation of learning and swimming performance. Journal of sports sciences. 2007;25(5):577-86.
  21. Bund A, Wiemeyer J. Self-controlled learning of a complex motor skill: Effects of the learner's preferences on performance and self-efficacy. Journal of Human Movement Studies. 2004; 47:215-36.
  22. Kolovelonis A, Goudas M, Samara E. The Effects of a Self-Regulated Learning Teaching Unit on Students’ Performance Calibration, Goal Attainment, and Attributions in Physical Education. The Journal of Experimental Education. 2020:1-18.
  23. Kok M, Komen A, van Capelleveen L, van der Kamp J. The effects of self-controlled video feedback on motor learning and self-efficacy in a Physical Education setting: An exploratory study on the shot-put. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. 2020;25(1):49-66.
  24. Kolovelonis A, Goudas M, Gerodimos V. The effects of the reciprocal and the self-check styles on pupils’ performance in primary physical education. European Physical Education Review. 2011;17(1):35-50.
  25. Goudas M, Dermitzaki I, Kolovelonis A. Self-regulated learning and students’ metacognitive feelings in physical education. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2017;15(2):131-45.
  26. Yokuş T. The effect of metacognitive strategies-based teaching practice in guitar education on performance achievement. Psychology of Music. 2020:0305735620968259.
  27. Zimmerman BJ. Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American educational research journal. 2008;45(1):166-83.
  28. Rich M. Indoor play ideas to stimulate young children at home Safe fun and learning during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak 2020 [Available from: https://www.unicef.org/parenting/coronavirus-covid-19-guide-parents/indoor-play-ideas-stimulate-young-children-home
  29. Bjork RA. Memory and metamemory considerations in the. Metacognition: Knowing about knowing. 1994;185.
  30. Chatzipanteli A, Digelidis N. The influence of metacognitive prompting on students’ performance in a motor skills test in physical education. International Journal of Sports Science and Engineering. 2011;5(2):093-8.
  31. Akbaripour R, Daneshfar A, Shojaei M. [Reliability of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-(MABC-2) in children aged 7-10 years in Tehran (in persian)]. scientific journal of rehabilitation medicine. 2018;7(4):90-6.
  32. Schoemaker MM, Niemeijer AS, Flapper BC, SMITS‐ENGELSMAN BC. Validity and reliability of the movement assessment battery for children‐2 checklist for children with and without motor impairments. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 2012;54(4):368-75.
  33. Baliad MR, MajidAv H, Ahadi H. [Comparison of social and cognitive development of 5-7 year old children based on parenting styles (in persian)]. Journal of psychologicalscience. 2020;18(84):2279-84.
  34. Rahmani J, Abedi MR. [Normalization of colored Raven test for children 5 to 10 years old in Isfahan province (in persian)] Journal of Doctrine Quarterly. 2009(23):81-6.
  35. Karimian R, Karimian M, Hadipour M, Heyat F, Janbozorgi A. [The Prevalence of Children’s Postural Abnormalities and Its Association with Sport Activity (in persian)]. Journal of Fasa University of Medical Sciences. 2016;6(1):106-12.
  36. Roach L, Keats M. Skill-based and planned active play versus free-play effects on fundamental movement skills in preschoolers. Perceptual and motor skills. 2018;125(4):651-68.
  37. Soltani H, Sadeghian MR, Samadi H. [The Effect of Exergame and Traditional Games on the Development of Fundamental Movement Skills in Children with Developmental Motor Delay of 7-9 Years Old (in persian)]. Journal of Motor and Behavioral Sciences. 2018;1(3):245-53.
  38. Alikhani K, Rostami R, Alborzi M. [The Effect of Creative Movement Games on the Fundamental Motor Skills of 4-6 Years Old Children (in persian)]. Studies in learning and instruction (Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities of Shiraz University. 2019;10(2):219-37.
  39. Wasenius NS, Grattan KP, Harvey AL, Naylor P-J, Goldfield GS, Adamo KB. The effect of a physical activity intervention on preschoolers’ fundamental motor skills—A cluster RCT. Journal of science and medicine in sport. 2018;21(7):714-9.
  40. McCardle L, Young BW, Baker J. Self-regulated learning and expertise development in sport: Current status, challenges, and future opportunities. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2019;12(1):112-38.
  41. Pitkethly AJ, Lau PW, Maddison R. Investigating the association of self-regulated learning skills and physical activity in Hong Kong Chinese and Scottish adolescents. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2019;17(6):670-84.
  42. Chatzipanteli A, Grammatikopoulos V, Gregoriadis A, care. Development and evaluation of metacognition in early childhood education. Early child development and care. 2014;184(8):1223-32.
  43. Liu J, Xiang P, McBride RE, Chen H. Self-regulated learning strategies and achievement goals among preservice physical education teachers. European Physical Education Review. 2020;26(2):375-91.