رفتار حرکتی

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

هزینه های دریافت نشریه

راهنمای نویسندگان

فرم ها

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

تاثیر نوروفیدبک و تمرین حرکتی بر اکتساب و یادداری عملکرد حرکتی رویه ای

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه رفتار حرکتی پردیس دانشگاه ارومیه

2 دانشگاه ارومیه

3 استاد گروه علوم اعصاب دانشگاه علوم پزشکی ایران

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر به بررسی تاثیر تمرین‏های نوروفیدبک و حرکتی بر یادگیری عملکرد حرکتی رویه‏ای در افراد نوجوان مبتدی پرداخته است. ابتدا تعداد 44 دانش‏ آموز (میانگین سنی 6/0 ± 1/12) فاقد دسترسی به وسایل هوشمند، از بین دانش‏آموزان ابتدایی به صورت نمونه‏‎ گیری خوشه‏ ای چند مرحله ‏ای انتخاب، و به صورت تصادفی در چهار گروه نوروفیدبک، تمرین حرکتی، تمرین‏ترکیبی و کنترل جایدهی شدند. اجرای پژوهش شش مرحله شامل: ثبت اطلاعات پایة امواج مغزی اولیه، پیش‏آزمون، مداخله‏ها (تمرین‏ نوروفیدبک شامل یک جلسه سی دقیقه‏ای سرکوب موج آلفا در ناحیه حسی-حرکتی C4 برای گروه نوروفیدبک و ترکیبی، و تمرین حرکتی شامل شش بسته‏ تمرینی پیگردی چرخان برای گروه حرکتی و ترکیبی)، ثبت اطلاعات پایه امواج مغزی ثانویه، پس آزمون و آزمون یادداری بود. مراحل یک تا پنج در یک روز و مرحله آخر پس از 48 ساعت استراحت اجرا شد همه آزمودنی‏ها راست دست بودند و تکلیف پیگردی چرخان را به شیوۀ معکوس با دست غیربرتر انجام دادند. برای تحلیل داده‏ها از آزمون تحلیل واریانس با اندازه‌گیری‌های مکرر یک‌طرفه استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد عملکرد گروه نوروفیدبک و حرکتی (P=0.010)، نوروفیدبک و ترکیبی (P=0.044) حرکتی و کنترل (p=0.022) تفاوت معناداری دارند اما، در نتایج عملکرد گروه حرکتی و ترکیبی ( P=1.000) ،ترکیبی و کنترل (P=0.090) و کنترل و نوروفیدبک تفاوت معنادار نیست (P=1.000). یافته‏ های حاضر نشان داد کاهش آلفا در C4 در اکتساب و یادداری حرکات ناآشنا و غیرخودکار در افراد مبتدی تاثیر معناداری ندارد ولی تمرین حرکتی روش موثری برای یادگیری این افراد در اولین مرحله یادگیری می‏
باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of Neurofeedback and Motor Training on Acquisition and Consolidation of Procedural Motor Performance

نویسندگان [English]

  • Fereshteh Barzegar Kolour 1
  • Hassan Mohammadzadeh 2
  • Mohammad ali Nazari 3

1 Motor Behaviour Department of pardis of urmia university

2 department of motor behavior university of Urmia

3 department neuroscience, Iran University of Medical Sciences

چکیده [English]

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of neurofeedback (NFB) and motor training (MT) on the learning and consolidation of procedural motor performance in novice adolescents. 44 elementary students (mean age 12.1 ±0.6), who had no access to smart devices, were selected as the sample of the research, and then were randomly assigned into four groups; NFB, MT, NFB+MT and control. The implementation of the study included six stages: first baseline, pre-test, intervention (NFB included a 30 minute single-session of alpha suppression on the C4 region for NFB and NFB+MT groups. MT by using 6 blocks of Pursuit Rotor Task (PRT) for NFB+MT and MT groups), secondary baseline, post-test and consolidation test, respectively. Stages 1-5 were done in one day but last stage (learning consolidation test) was conducted 48 hours after the rest period. Participants were right-handed and performed PRT in inverted mode with their non-dominant hand. One-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyses the data. The results showed significantly different between the performance of NFB and MT (P=0.010), NFB and NFB+MT (P=0.044), MT and Control (P=0.022) groups, but the difference between MT and NFB+MT (P=1.000), NFB+MT and Control (P=0.90), and NFB and Control (P=1.000) groups was not significant.
The present findings showed that the alpha suppression in C4 had no significant effect on learning and consolidation of unfamiliar and non-automatic movements in novice adolescents but motor training can be an effective way for these people in the first stage of their learning.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • brain- training
  • alpha rhythm
  • human movement
  • adolescent
  • mental recall
مراجع
  1. Krakauer JW, Hadjiosif AM, Wong AL, Xu J, Haith AM. Motor Learning. (2019). Compr Physiol. 2019;9(2):613-663.
  2. Vine SJ, Moore LJ, Cooke A, Ring C, Wilson MR. Quiet eye training: a means to
  3. Gardner F, Moore Z. Clinical sport psychology. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2006. ISBN:9780736053051, 0736053050
  4. implicit motor learning. International Journal of Sport Psychology. 2013;44(4):367-86.
  •  
  1. Norouzi E, Hosseini F S, Vaezmosavi M, Gerber M, Pühse U & Brand S. effects of quiet mind training on alpha power suppression and fine motor skill acquisition. J Mot Behav. 2018;53(1):1-10. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2018.1528203.
  2. Ros T, Munneke M, Parkinson L, & Gruzelier J. Neurofeedback facilitation of implicit motor learning. Biological Psychology.2014;95:54–8.
  3. Lam W, Maxwell J, & Masters R. Analogy versus explicit learning of a modified basketball shooting task: Performance and kinematic outcomes. Journal of Sports 2009;27(2):179–91.
  4. Masters R S. Knowledge, knerves and know-how: the role of explicit versus implicit knowledge in the breakdown of a complex motor skill under pressure. British Journal of Psychology. 1992;83(3):343–58.
  5. Schmidt RA, Lee T, Winstein C, Wulf G, & Zelaznik Motor control and learning. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics;2018. ISBN-13978-1492547754
  6. Cohen NJ, Squire LR. Preserved learning and retention of pattern analyzing skills in amnesia: dissociation of knowing how and knowing that. Science. 1980; 210:207–10.
  7. Demos JN. Getting stated with neurofeedback. New York, London: W.W. Norton & Company; 2005. ISBN-13978-0393704501
  8. Klimesch W, Doppelmayer M, Schwaiger J, Auinger P, Winkler T. Paradoxical alpha synchronization in a memory task. Cogn. Brain Res. 1999; 7:491–501.
  9. Pfurtscheller G, Stancak A, Neuper, C. Event-related synchronization (ERS) in the alpha band - an electrophysiological correlate of cortical idling: a review. Int J Psychophysiol. 1996; 24:39–46.
  10. Smith ME, McEvoy LK, Gevins A. Neurophysiological indices of strategy development and skill acquisition. Cogn Brain Res. 1999; 7:389–404.
  11. Chuang LY, Huang CJ, Hung TM. The differences in frontal midline theta power between successful and unsuccessful basketball free throws of elite basketball players. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 2013;90(3):321-8.
  12. Ros T, Munneke MA, Ruge D, Gruzelier JH, Rothwell JC. Endogenous control of waking brain rhythms induces neuroplasticity in humans. European Journal of Neuroscience, 2010;31(4):770-8.
  13. Taheri M, Noorian F. The effect of neurofeedback training on sleep quality and psychological skills of athletes with psychophysiological approach. Journal of Motor Learning and Movement. 2017;9(2):239-51. (In Persian)
  14. Cooke A, Gallicchio G, Kavussanu M, Willoughby A, McIntyre D, & Ring C. Premovement high-alpha power is modulated by previous movement errors: Indirect evidence to endorse high-alpha power as a marker of resource allocation during motor programming. Psychophysiology. 2015;52(7):977–81.
  15. Gallicchio G, Cooke A, & Ring C. Lower left temporal- frontal connectivity characterizes expert and accurate performance: High-alpha T7-Fz connectivity as a marker of conscious processing during movement. Sport, Exercise, and 2016;5(1):14-24.
  16. Park JL, Fairweather MM, Donaldson DI. Making the case for mobile cognition: EEG and sports performance. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2015;31(52):117-30.
  17. Klimesch W. Alpha-band oscillations, attention, and controlled access to stored information. Trends in Cognitive 2012;16(12):606–17.
  18. Mikicin M, Kowalczyk M. Audio-Visual and autogenic relaxation alter amplitude of alpha EEG band, causing improvements in mental work performance in athletes. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2015; 40:219–27.
  19. Zhu FF, Poolton JM, Wilson MR, Maxwell JP, Masters RS. Neural co-activation as a yardstick of implicit motor learning and the propensity for conscious control of Biological Psychology. 2011;87(1):66-73.
  20. Janelle CM, Hillman CH, Apparies RJ, Murray NP, Meili L, Fallon EA, et al. Expertise differences in cortical activation and gaze behavior during rifle shooting. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2000;22(2):167-82.
  21. Landers DM, Petruzzello SJ, Salazar W, Crews DJ, Kubitz KA, Gannon TL, et al. The influence of electrocortical biofeedback on performance in pre-elite archers. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1991 Jan;23(1):123-9.
  22. Rienhoff R, Baker J, Fischer L, Strauss B, & Schorer J. Field of vision influences sensory-motor control of skilled and less-skilled dart players. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine. 2012;11(3):542 –550.
  23. Vickers JN. Perception, cognition, and decision training: the quiet eye in action Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; June 2007: Publisher: Human Kinetics Publishers. ISBN: 13:978-0-7360-4256-7
  24. Vine SJ, Wilson MR. The influence of quiet eye training and pressure on attention and visuo-motor control. Acta Psychologica. 2011;136(3):340–6.
  25. Del Percio C, Infarinato F, Iacoboni M, Marzano N, Soricelli A, Aschieri P, et al. Movement-related desynchronization of alpha rhythms is lower in athletes than non-athletes: a high-resolution EEG study. Clin Neurophysiol . 2010;121(4):482-91.
  26. Piper BJ. Age, handedness, and sex contribute to fine motor behavior in children. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 2011;195(1):88-91.
  27. Noguchi T, Demura S, Nagasawa Y, Uchiyama M. Influence of measurement order by dominant and nondominant hands on performance of a pursuit-rotor task. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2009;108(3):905-14.
  28. Sepehri Bonab H, Mohammadzade H, Ebrahimi Sani S. Procedural motor learning facilitation and consolida-tion by neurofeedback. Motor Behavior. 2018;10(31):129-46. (In Persian).
  29. Ghasemian MR, Taheri HR, Saberi Kakhki AR, Ghoshuni M. Effects of alpha suppression and theta enhancement neurofeedback protocols on learning a pursuit tracking task. Journal of Psychophysiology .2016;53(7):965-73.
  30. Nitsche MA, Schauenburg A, Lang N, Liebetanz D, Exner C, Paulus W et al. Facilitation of Implicit Motor Learning by Weak Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Primary motor cortex in the human. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2003;15(4):619-26.
  31. Jeunet C, Glize B, McGonigal A, Batail G_M, Micoulaud-Franchi G-A. Review using EEG-based brain computer inter face and neurofeedback targeting sensorimotor rhythms to improve motor skills: Theoretical background, applications and prospects. Neurophysiologie Clinique. 2019;49(2):125-36.  
  32. Vernon DJ. Can neurofeedback training enhance performance? an evaluation of the evidence with implications for future research. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback. 2005;30(4):347-64.
  33. Alves-pinto A, Turova V, Blumenstein T, Hantuschke C, Lampe R.Implicit Learning of a Finger Motor Sequence by Patients with Cerebral palsy after Neurofeedback. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2017;42(1):27-37.
  34. Mohammad Zadeh H, Salehi M. An introduction to biofeedback application in sport (with an emphasis on neurofeedback): First.Urmia University;2015. P. 105-108. (In Persian).
  35. Heydari M, Torabi F.Movement 1st ed.. Tehran: Payam Noor University; 2021. (In Persian).
رفتار حرکتی
دوره 15، شماره 51
فروردین 1402
صفحه 91-114
فایل ها
سابقه مقاله
  • تاریخ دریافت: 10 دی 1399
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 31 خرداد 1400
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 28 تیر 1400
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار