بررسی سه روش مداخله غیر تهاجمی تمرین حسی ‌پیکری، تمرین نوروفیدبک و ماساژ کف پا بر تعادل سالمندان بالای 65 سال

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

گروه رفتارحرکتی، دانشکده علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران

چکیده
هدف این مطالعه ارزیابی اثربخشی تمرینات تعادلی غیرتهاجمی حسی ‌پیکری (فعال و غیرفعال) و نوروفیدبک بر شاخص‌های تعادل پویا و ایستا در سالمندان بود. شرکت‌کنندگان 60 نفر بزرگسال سالم (مرد، میانگین سن: 66/67 سال، میانگین وزن: 642/65 کیلوگرم) بودند که به طور تصادفی در یکی از چهار گروه حسی‌پیکری فعال، حسی‌پیکری غیرفعال (ماساژ کف پا)، نوروفیدبک و کنترل قرار گرفتند. ابتدا آزمودنی‌ها پیش‌آزمون‌های تعادل ایستا و پویا را تکمیل کردند. سپس در 15 جلسه تمرین 30 دقیقه‌ای شرکت کرده و در پایان پس‌آزمون و آزمون انتقال را تکمیل کردند. آزمون‌های مرحله اکتساب شامل آزمون خطر سقوط برای تعادل ایستا و آزمون بلند شدن و رفتن زمان‌دار برای تعادل پویا بود. آزمون‌های مرحله انتقال در تعادل ایستا آزمون محدودیت ثبات و در تعادل پویا مقیاس تعادل برگ بود. برای بررسی آماری ویژگی‌های شخصیت‌شناسی آزمودنی‌ها از آزمون t مستقل و برای بررسی تعادل در گروه‌ها از میکس آنوای یکطرفه و آزمون‌های تعقیبی توکی اچ‌ای‌دی استفاده شد. نتایج حاکی از بهبود تعادل ایستا و پویا در هر سه گروه آزمایشی در آزمون اکتساب بود. همچنین بهبود تعادل در آزمون انتقال در گروه نوروفیدبک و حسی‌پیکری به‌ترتیب در شرایط ایستا و پویا مشاهده شد. گروه ماساژ کف پا بهبود در تعادل ایستا و پویا داشت، اما امتیاز آن از دو گروه دیگر کمتر بود. به ‌طور کلی یافته‌ها حاکی از آن است که مداخلات تمرینی نوروفیدبک بهتر است در ترکیب و همراه با مداخلات تمرینی حسی‌پیکری باشد تا بیشترین تأثیر را بر پیشگیری از افتادن و بهبود تعادل کلی در بزرگسالان بر جای بگذارد. به انجام تحقیقات بیشتری برای ارزیابی اثرات بلند مدت و ناپیوسته حاصل از این مداخلات غیرتهاجمی بر تعادل در سالمندان نیاز است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Investigation of Tree Non-Invasive Intervention Methods: Somatosensory Training, Neurofeedback Training, and Foot Massage on Balance in Elderly People Over 65 Years Old

نویسندگان English

Atefeh Azarpaikan
Hamidreza Taheri
Manochehr Ghalkhani
Department of Sport Science, Faculty of Motor learning, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
چکیده English

Extended Abstract
Background and Purpose
Balance is a critical component of physical fitness closely linked to health, defined as the ability to maintain the body’s position in space. As aging populations increase globally, falls have become a common and serious problem among the elderly, often leading to injury and disability. Therefore, investigating effective methods to prevent falls and enhance balance is of paramount importance. These methods aim to improve balance performance by targeting the underlying somatosensory and neuromuscular systems that support postural control. The present study examined the effects of three non-invasive intervention methods—active somatosensory training, passive somatosensory training (foot massage), and neurofeedback training—on static and dynamic balance in healthy elderly adults. The research sought to answer two primary questions: (a) Do active, passive, and neurofeedback somatosensory training differentially affect the acquisition of static and dynamic balance? (b) Do these interventions influence the transfer of static and dynamic balance abilities?
 
Methods
Sixty healthy male adults from Mashhad, Iran, with a mean age of 67.66 years (SD = 3.1), participated in the study. None had prior experience with balance training. Participants completed the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28) and underwent neurobehavioral cognitive status evaluation (NCSE) to ensure mental and physical health and absence of cognitive impairment. They were randomly assigned to one of four groups: active somatosensory training (SST-1), passive somatosensory training (SST-2), neurofeedback training (NFT), or a control group. Two participants (one from the NFT group and one from the control group) did not complete the delayed transfer tests.
Static balance was assessed using the Biodex SD balance system’s fall risk test during the acquisition phase (pre- and post-test) and the limit of stability test during the transfer phase, both set at level 8 difficulty. Dynamic balance was evaluated using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) during acquisition and the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test during transfer.
Neurofeedback training was conducted using the Biograph Infiniti software system (version 5). Active somatosensory training involved exercises on a 5-meter patterned surface with small round bumps designed to stimulate plantar mechanoreceptors under weight-bearing conditions. Passive somatosensory training consisted of foot massage using a grooved foam roller (7 cm diameter, 20 cm length) to provide non-weight-bearing tactile stimulation.
Each experimental group completed 15 sessions of 30 minutes each over the study period. The control group underwent only pre- and post-testing without intervention.
Data were analyzed using SPSS version 19. Independent t-tests compared demographic variables, and a one-way mixed ANOVA (group × time) was conducted to analyze static and dynamic balance outcomes. Tukey’s HSD test was applied for post hoc comparisons. Mauchly’s test assessed sphericity assumptions. Statistical significance was set at α = 0.05 with a 95% confidence interval.
 
Results
Baseline comparisons showed no significant differences among groups in age, weight, height, mental health (GHQ-28), or cognitive status (NCSE), confirming group homogeneity (Table 1).
All three intervention groups demonstrated significant improvements in balance measures post-intervention (Table 2). Specifically, the interaction effects among NFT, SST-1, and SST-2 groups indicated a reduced fall risk (Figure A-2). The TUG test revealed significant reductions in completion time for SST-1, NFT, and SST-2 groups, respectively (Figure A-2).
Transfer test results suggested differential effects of interventions on balance transfer abilities. SST-1 showed superior performance in dynamic balance transfer, while NFT excelled in static balance transfer. Although SST-2 outperformed the control group, it lagged behind SST-1 and NFT in transfer test performance (Figure 3).
 
Conclusion
The findings indicate that both static and dynamic balance improved significantly following neurofeedback (NFT), active somatosensory training (SST-1), and passive somatosensory training (SST-2). These interventions enhance balance through distinct mechanisms. Active somatosensory training, involving weight-bearing stimulation of a broad plantar surface, likely engages multiple somatosensory receptors and the vestibular system, thereby improving dynamic balance performance and maintenance in healthy elderly individuals. Passive stimulation, even without weight bearing, still exerts a meaningful effect on balance preservation.
Neurofeedback training enhances balance by promoting self-regulation at the cerebral cortex level, improving information processing, directing attention toward environmental perception, and augmenting visual recognition and observation processes. This mechanism particularly benefits static balance stability.
Overall, the study supports the use of these non-invasive interventions to improve balance and reduce fall risk in the elderly. Practitioners may consider substituting one method with another when necessary, as all showed beneficial effects.
Keywords: Static Balance, Dynamic Balance, Somatosensory Training, Neurofeedback Training, Foot Massage
 
ArticleMessage
If any of the three methods—active somatosensory training, passive somatosensory training, or neurofeedback—are unavailable, substituting with one of the others can still yield positive and meaningful improvements in balance among elderly individuals.
Ethical Considerations
All experimental procedures were conducted under the supervision of the Motor Behavior Group at Ferdowsi University, adhering strictly to ethical guidelines. Ethical approval was granted by the relevant committee, with documentation submitted to the journal.
Authors’ Contributions
Conceptualization: Azarpaikan and Taheri
Data Collection: Azarpaikan and Galkhani
Data Analysis: Azarpaikan and Galkhani
Manuscript Writing: Azarpaikan and Galkhani
Review and Editing: Azarpaikan and Taheri
Project Management: Taheri
Literature Review: Azarpaikan
Funding Responsibility: None
Confli t of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the Faculty of Sport Sciences laboratory at Ferdowsi University and express sincere thanks to all participants, especially the elderly individuals who contributed to this research

 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Static balance
dynamic balance
somatosensory training
neurofeedback training
foot massage
1.       Aartolahti E, Tolppanen AM, Lnnroos E, et al. Health condition and physical function as predictors of adherence in longterm strength and balance training among community-dwelling older adults. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2015; 61:452–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2015.06.016
2.       Sturnieks DL, St George R, Lord SR. Balance disorders in the elderly. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008; 38:467–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucli.2008.09.001
3.       Paquette MR, Li Y, Hoekstra J, Bravo J. An 8-week reactive balance training program in older healthy adults: a preliminary investigation. Journal of Sport Health Science. 2015; 4:263–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2014.06.004 
4.       Graham DF, Carty CP, Lloyd DG, et al. Biomechanical predictors of maximal balance recovery performance amongst community-dwelling older adults. Exp Gerontol. 2015; 66:39–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2015.04.006  
5.       Chang NY, Uchanski R M, Hullar TE. Temporal integration of auditory and vestibular stimuli. Laryngoscope. 2012; 122:1379–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.23329
6.       Hatton AL, Dixon J, Martin D, et al. The effect of textured surfaces on postural stability and lower limb muscle activity. Journal of Electromyog Kinesiol. 19; 2009:957–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.04.012
7.       Perry SD. Evaluation of age-related plantar-surface insensitivity and onset age of advanced insensitivity in older adults using vibratory and touch sensation tests. Neurosci Lett. 2006; 392:62–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2005.08.060
8.       Palluel E, Nougier V, Olivier I. Do spike insoles enhance postural stability and plantar surface cutaneous sensitivity in the elderly? AGE, 30;2008:53–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-008-9047-2
9.       Priplata AA, Niemi JB, Harry JD, et al. Vibrating insoles and balance control in elderly people. Lancet. 2003; 362:1123–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(03)14470-4
10.    Lesemann F, Reuter EM, Godde B. Tactile stimulation interventions: influence of stimulation parameters on sensorimotor behavior and neurophysiological correlates in healthy and clinical samples. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015; 51:126–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.01.005
11.    Gruzelier JH, Foks M, Steffert T, et al. Beneficial outcome from EEG-neurofeedback on creative music performance, attention and well-being in school children. Biol Psychol. 2014; 95:86–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.04.005
12.    Zhang Y, Chen Y, Bressler SL, et al. Response preparation and inhibition: the role of the cortical sensorimotor beta rhythm. Neuroscience. 2008; 156:238–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.06.061
13.    Ninausa MC, Kobera SE, Wittea, M, et al. Brain volumetry and self-regulation of brain activity relevant for neurofeedback. Biol Psychol. 2015; 110:126–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.07.009
14.    Hammond DC. Neurofeedback to improve physical balance, incontinence, and swallowing. Journal of Neurother. 2005;9(1):27–36. https://doi.org/10.1300/j184v09n01_03
15.    Basta D, Todt I, Ernst A. Characterization of age-related changes in vestibular evoked myogenic potential. Journal of Vest Research. 2007; 17:93–8. https://doi.org/10.3233/ves-2007-172-304
16.    Rossi-Izquierdo M, Ernst A, Soto-Varela A, et al. Vibrotactile neurofeedback balance training in patients with Parkinson’s disease: reducing the number of falls. Gait Posture. 2012;37: 195–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.07.002
17.    Azarpaikan A, Taherii HR, Sohrabi M. Neurofeedback and physical balance in Parkinson’s patients. Gait Posture. 2014; 40:177–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.03.179
18.    Goldberg DP, Gater R, Sartorius N, et al. The validity of two versions of the GHQ in the WHO study of mental illness in general health care. Psychol Med. 1997; 27:191–7. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291796004242
19.    Macaulaya C, Battistab M, Lebbyc PC, et al. Geriatric performance on the neurobehavioral cognitive status examination (Cognistat): What is normal? Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2003; 18:463–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0887-6177(02)00141-5
20.    Mak TC, Wong TL, Ng SM. Visual-related training to improve balance and walking ability in older adults: a systematic review. Experimental Gerontology. 2021; 156:111612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2021.111612
21.    Reichert JL, Kober SE, Neuper C, et al. Resting-state sensorimotor rhythm (SMR) power predicts the ability to up-regulate SMR in an EEG-instrumental conditioning paradigm. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015; 126:2068–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2014.09.032
22.    Halder S, Varkuti B, Bogdan M, et al. Prediction of brain computer interface aptitude from individual brain structure. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013; 7:105. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00105
23.    Dickson CT, Kirk IJ, Oddi SD, et al. Classification of thetarelated cells in the entorhinal cortex: cell discharges are controlled by the ascending brainstem synchronizing pathway in parallel with hippocampal theta-related cells. Hippocampus. 1995; 5:306–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.450050404
24.    Behm D, Colado JC. The effectiveness of resistance training using unstable surfaces and devises for rehabilitation. Int J Sports Phys Therapy. 7; 2012:226–41. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3325639/
25.    Kennedy PM, Inglis JT. Distribution and behaviour of glabrous cutaneous receptors in the human foot sole. J Physiol. 2002; 1:995–1002. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2001.013087
26.    Wu G, Chiang JH. The significance of somatosensory stimulations to the human foot in the control of postural reflexes. Brain Res. 1997; 114:163–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/pl00005616
27.    Merriman NA, Whyatt C, Setti A, et al. Successful balance training is associated with improved multisensory function in fallprone older adults. Comput Hum Behav. 2015; 45:192–203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.017
28.    Wilson ML, Rome K, Hodgson D, et al. Effect of textured foot orthotics on static and dynamic postural stability in middle aged females. Gait Posture. 2008; 27:36–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.12.006
29.    Sood P, Chatterjee SA, et al. Somatosensory impairment of the feet is associated with higher activation of prefrontal cortex during walking in older adults. Exp Gerontol. 2022; 168:111845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2022.111845
30.    Abrantes R, Monteiro R, et al. The acute effect of two massage techniques on functional capability and balance in recreationally trained older adult women: a cross-over study. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies. 2021; 28:458-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.07.010
31.    Winberg TB, Hedg ET, et al. Influence of intermittent pneumatic compression on foot sensation and balance control in chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy patients. Clinical Biomechanics. 2021; 90:101255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105512
32.    Magill R, Anderson D. Motor learning and control: concepts and applications, 10th ed. McGraw-Hill Education; 2011.
دوره 17، شماره 59
اردیبهشت 1404
صفحه 35-52

  • تاریخ دریافت 11 اسفند 1401
  • تاریخ بازنگری 31 تیر 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش 04 مهر 1402