رفتار حرکتی

تاثیر رویکرد آموزش افتراقی و دستورالعمل های توجهی بر یادداری و انتقال شوت فوتسال

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری رفتار حرکتی، دانشکده تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه خوارزمی تهران، تهران، ایران

2 عضو هیات علمی-گروه رفتار حرکتی دانشکده تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی دانشگاه خوارزمی

3 استادیار رفتار حرکتی دانشگاه خوارزمی تهران

4 استادیار دانشکده تربیت بدنی دانشگاه خوارزمی

چکیده
مقدمه: داشتن یک رویکرد آموزشی مناسب که از زیربنای نظری قوی برخوردار باشد برای یادگیری مهارت های ورزشی ضرورری است. هدف از انجام مطالعه حاضر، بررسی تاثیر رویکرد آموزش افتراقی و دستورالعمل های توجهی بیرونی و درونی بر یادداری و انتقال شوت فوتسال بود. روش ها: تحقیق حاضر از نوع کاربردی با راهبرد نیمه تجربی، طرح متوالی و نمونه‌گیری در دسترس بود. تعداد نمونه در تحقیق حاضر 24 نفر بود که بطور تصادفی در 3 گروه تقسیم شدند. ابتدا از همه مشارکت کنندگان با استفاده از آزمون شوت فوتسال پیش آزمون گرفته شد. سپس، افراد به طور تصادفی هر گروه مطابق با دستورالعمل‌های مربوطه تمرینات خود را به مدت 12 هفته، هر هفته دو جلسه و هر جلسه 20 دقیقه انجام دادند. بعد از 12 هفته، آزمون یادداری فوری بلافاصله بعد از اتمام تمرینات و یادداری تاخیری و انتقال با فاصله یک هفته بعد از اتمام تمرین با استفاده از آزمون مهارت شوت گرفته شد. برای تحلیل داده‌ها از آزمون آنوای یک راهه در نرم افزار SPSS نسخه 23 و با سطح معنی‌داری 05/0 استفاده شد. یافته ها: بین روش‌های آموزش افتراقی با دستورالعمل توجه بیرونی، افتراقی با دستورالعمل توجه درونی و افتراقی بدون دستورالعمل توجه بر یادگیری حرکتی و انتقال در مهارت شوت فوتسال تفاوت معنادار وجود داشت. نتیجه گیری: این مطالعه اثربخشی رویکرد یادگیری افتراقی با دستورالعمل توجه بیرونی بر یادداری و انتقال مهارت شوت فوتسال را نشان می دهد. به منظور طراحی بهتر و موثرتر تمرینات برای یادگیری مهارت حرکتی می‌توان از نتایج تحقیق استفاده کرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

The effect of differential Education approach and attention instructions on futsal shoot retention and transfer

نویسندگان English

  • sara oftadeh 1
  • Abbas Bahram 2
  • Rasoul Yaali 3
  • Farhad Ghadiri 4
1 Ph.D. Student in Motor Behavior, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of motor behavior karazmi university Tehran-Iran
3 Assistant professor of motor behavior, Kharazmi university of Tehran
4 Assistant Professor, Kharazmi University, Faculty of Physical Education & Sport Science
چکیده English

Introduction: A proper educational approach with a solid theoretical foundation is essential for learning sports skills. This study aimed to determine the effect of a differential education approach external and internal attention instructions on indoor football shoot learning and transfer. Methodology: The present study was conducted with a quasi-experimental strategy, sequential design, and available sampling. The number of samples in the present study was 24, randomly divided into three groups. First, all participants were pre-tested using the indoor football shoot test. Then, according to the relevant instructions, individuals randomly performed their exercises in each group for 12 weeks, two sessions per week and 20 minutes per session. After 12 weeks, the immediate retention test was taken immediately after the exercises. The delayed retention and transfer were taken one week after the end of the exercise using the shooting skill test. A one-way ANOVA test was used to analyze the data in SPSS software version 23 with a significance level of 0.05. Results: There was a significant difference between differential training methods with external attention instruction, differential training with internal attention instruction and differential without instruction with attention methods on motor learning and transfer in indoor football shooting skills. Conclusion: This study showed the effectiveness of the differential learning approach with external attention instructions on retention and transfer of indoor football shoot skills. Research results can be used in order to design exercises for learning motor skills better and more effectively.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

  • Chaotic method of differential learning approach
  • External and Internal Attention instructions
  • Motor learning
  • Transfer
  • Indoor football
  1. Schöllhorn WI, Bauer HU. Identifying individual movement styles in high performance sports by means of self-organizing Kohonen maps. Paper presented at: 16 International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports; 1998 July 21-25; Konstanz, German.
  2. Lee MC, Chow JY, Komar J, Tan CW, Button C. Nonlinear pedagogy: an effective approach to cater for individual differences in learning a sports skill. PloS One. 2014;9(8):e104744.
  3. Abernethy B, Maxwell JP, Masters RS, Van Der Kamp J, Jackson RC. Attentional processes in skill learning and expert performance. 3rd New Jersey: Hoboken; 2007. pp. 245–63.
  4. Farrow D, Reid M. The effect of equipment scaling on the skill acquisition of beginning tennis players. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2010;28(7):723-32.
  5. Davids K, Chow JY, Shuttleworth R. A constraints-based framework for nonlinear pedagogy in physical educational. New Zealand Physical Educator. 2005;38(1):17.
  6. Schollhorn W, Michelbrink M, Welminsiki D, Davids K. Increasing stochastic perturbations enhances acquisition and learning of complex sport movements. In: Perspectives on Cognition and Action in Sport. US: Nova Science; 2009. pp. 59-73.
  7. Bozkurt S. The effects of differential learning and traditional learning trainings on technical development of football players. Journal of Education and Training Studies. 2018;6:25-9.
  8. Frank T, Michelbrink M, Beckmann H, Schöllhorn W. A quantitative dynamical systems approach to differential learning: self-organization principle and order parameter equations. Biological Cybernetics. 2018;98:19–31.
  9. Schöllhorn W, Michelbrink M, Beckmann H, Trockel M, Sechelmann M, Davids K. Does noise provide a basis for the unification of motor learning theories? International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2006;37:34–42.
  10. Henz D, John A, Merz C, Schöllhorn WI. Post-task effects on eeg brain activity differ for various differential learning and contextual interference protocols. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2018;12:19.
  11. Santos S, Mateus N, Sampaio J, Leite N. Do previous sports experiences influence the effect of an enrichment programme in basketball skills? Journal of Sports Sciences. 2017;35(17):1759-67.
  12. Santos S, Coutinho D, Gonçalves B, Schöllhorn W, Sampaio J, Leite N. Differential learning as a key training approach to improve creative and tactical behavior in soccer. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 2018;89(1):11-24.
  13. Henz D, Schöllhorn WI. Differential training facilitates early consolidation in motor learning. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience. 2016; 10:199.
  14. Schollhorn W, Hegen P, Davids K. The nonlinear nature of learning-A differential learning approach. The Open Sports Sciences Journal. 2012;5(1):100-112.
  15. Coutinho D, Santos S, Gonçalves B, Travassos B, Wong DP, Schöllhorn W, et al. The effects of an enrichment training program for youth football attackers. PloS One. 2018;13(6):e0199008.
  16. Yildirim Y, Kizilet A. The effects of differential learning method on the tennis ground stroke accuracy and mobility. Journal of Education and Learning. 2020;9(6):146-54.
  17. Serrien B, Tassignon B, Baeyens JP, Clijsen R. Theoretical and empirical appraisal of differential motor learning: systematic review and meta-analysis. SportRxiv. 2018;10: 37-49.
  18. Ducharme SW, Wu WF, Lim K, Porter JM, Geraldo F. Standing long jump performance with an external focus of attention is improved as a result of a more effective projection angle. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2016;30(1):276-81.
  19. Bell JJ, Hardy J. Effects of attentional focus on skilled performance in golf. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. 2009;21(2):163-77.
  20. Lohse K, Sherwood DE. Defining the focus of attention: effects of attention on perceived exertion and fatigue. Frontiers in psychology. 2011; 2:332.
  21. Porter JM, Ostrowski EJ, Nolan RP, Wu WF. Standing long-jump performance is enhanced when using an external focus of attention. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2010;24(7):1746-50.
  22. Wulf G, McNevin N, Shea CH. The automaticity of complex motor skill learning as a function of attentional focus. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A. 2001;54(4):1143-54.
  23. Lattwein M, Henz D, Schöllhorn WI. Differential training as an intervention strategy to prevent choking under pressure in basketball freethrow. In: Book of Abstract of the 19th Annual Congress of the European College of Sport Science; 2014.
  24. Mateus N, Santos S, Vaz L, Gomes I, Leite N. The effect of a physical literacy and differential learning program in motor, technical and tactical basketball skills. Revista de Psicología del Deporte. 2015;24(1):73-6.
  25. Beckmann H, Schöllhorn WI. Differencial learning in shot put. 2006. Available at: https://sport.uni-mainz.de/files/2015/06/tws_dl_shotput.pdf.
  26. Wagner H, Müller E. The effects of differential and variable training on the quality parameters of a handball throw. Sports Biomechanics. 2008;7(1):54-71.
  27. Wagner H. Optimierung komplexer Bewegungsmuster bei Wurfbewegungen. Meyer & Meyer; 2005.
  28. Lohse KR, Sherwood DE, Healy AF. How changing the focus of attention affects performance, kinematics, and electromyography in dart throwing. Human Movement Science. 2010;29(4):542-55.
  29. Wulf G, Chiviacowsky S, Drews R. External focus and autonomy support: Two important factors in motor learning have additive benefits. Human Movement Science. 2015; 40:176-84.
  30. Simpson T, Cronin L, Ellison P, Carnegie E, Marchant D. A test of optimal theory on young adolescents' standing long jump performance and motivation. Human Movement Science. 2020; 72:102651.
  31. Trockel M, Schöllhorn WI. Differential training in soccer. In: European workshop on movement science mechanics and physiology. Alemania: Müster; 2003. pp. 22-4.
  32. Ozuak A, Çaglayan A. Differential learning as an important factor in training of football technical skills. Journal of Education and Training Studies. 2019;7(6):68-76.
  33. Chua LK, Wulf G, Lewthwaite R. Onward and upward: optimizing motor performance. Human Movement Science. 2018; 60:107-14.
  34. Hosseini, Sanaz et al. The effect of type practice of differential learning and contextual interference on the retention and transfer of badminton backhand short serve. Journal of Research in Sports Management and Motor Behavior. 2017. (In Persian).
  35. Wulf G, Lewthwaite R. Effortless motor learning? An external focus of attention enhances movement effectiveness and efficiency. In: Effortless Attention: A New Perspective in Attention and Action. Boston Review; 2010. pp. 105-101.
رفتار حرکتی
دوره 15، شماره 52
تیر 1402
صفحه 101-126

  • تاریخ دریافت 08 تیر 1401
  • تاریخ بازنگری 18 بهمن 1401
  • تاریخ پذیرش 27 دی 1402

صفحه اصلی

داوران

ارسال مقاله

اصول اخلاقی

اخبار و اعلانات

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

تماس با ما