تأثیر دست‌کاری بینایی بر نوسان امواج مغزی سالمندان در شرایط کنترل قامت ایستا

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه علوم رفتاری و شناختی در ورزش، دانشکده علوم ورزشی و تندرستی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران

2 گروه مدل سازی کارکردهای عالی شناختی، پژوهشکده علوم شناختی و مغز، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران

چکیده
هدف پژوهش حاضر بررسی اثر دست‌کاری بینایی بر کنترل قامت و کارکردهای قشر مغز سالمندان بود. در این مطالعه، 60 سالمند سالم (32/4±23/68 سال) شرکت کردند. شرکت‌کنندگان کنترل قامت ایستا را در حین ثبت الکتروانسفالوگرافی انجام دادند. در این مطالعه، 24 الکترود برای ثبت سیگنال‌های الکتروانسفالوگرافی استفاده شد. پس از بازرسی بصری برای شناسایی و حذف نویز، به‌منظور شناسایی و حذف اثرات مصنوعی بیولوژیک و محیطی مانند پلک‌زدن یا الکترومایوگرافی، از تجزیه ‌و تحلیل اجزای مستقل و تکنیک‌های پردازش استفاده شد. تجزیه‌ و تحلیل اجزای مستقل با استفاده از اسکریپت‌های مبتنی بر EEGlab (2023) پیاده‌سازی‌شده در MATLAB (R2023b) روی داده‌ها اعمال شد. نتایج آزمون تحلیل واریانس مرکب 4 (وضعیت) × (5) باند فرکانسی × (24) کانال نشان داد، قشر مغز به طور معناداری در کنترل قامت مشارکت داشت (0001/0P=). این مشارکت در شرایط چشم‌ باز و بسته قابل‌‌مشاهده بود. قشر حسی-پیکری، قشر جداری، پس‌سری چپ، گیجگاهی، مرکزی-آهیانه‌ای و جداری-پس‌سری، همگی در تولید نوسان امواج قشر مغز مرتبط با کنترل قامت ایستا نقش داشتند. در کنترل قامت ایستا با حذف بینایی کنترل قامت از سطح قشری به ساختار زیر قشری در طول کنترل قامت با چشم ‌بسته تغییر نکرد. سالمندان ممکن استراتژی‌های متفاوتی را در کنترل قامت به کار ببرند. به نظر می‌رسد، کنترل آگاهانه در سطح قشر بر کنترل خودکار یا سطوح زیر قشری در کنترل قامت ایستا سالمندان ارجحیت دارد. افزایش فعالیت قشر مغز یک استراتژی برای جبران زوال مرتبط با افزایش سن است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

The Effect of Visual Manipulation on the Oscillations of Cerebral Cortex Waves Elderly in Static Posture Control Situations

نویسندگان English

Saeed Alboghebeish 1
mahin aghdaei 1
Reza khosrowabadi 2
alirza farsi 1
1 Department of Behavioral Sciences and Cognitive and Sports Technology Faculty of Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
2 Institute for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Extended Abstract
Background and Purpose
Maintaining posture is a complex motor task that becomes increasingly challenging for elderly individuals due to the integration demands of various sensory inputs. The ability to sustain equilibrium in static postures relies on the central nervous system’s capability to regulate movements and postural adjustments, ensuring that the body's center of mass (COM) remains within the base of support as represented by the center of pressure (COP). The inverted pendulum model, described by Choi and Kim (2008), serves as a fundamental framework for conceptualizing human postural control. Within this paradigm, the COM oscillates forward while the COP generates a compensatory inward force that re-centers the COM over the support base. This study aimed to explore how vision manipulation influences posture control and cerebral cortical activity in older adults.
 
Methods
Sixty healthy elderly volunteers aged 65 to 74 years—equally divided between men and women to enhance external validity—participated in this study. During static postural control tasks, participants stood on a stationary Biodex Balance System platform, instructed to maintain posture without using hand or upper body muscle contractions. The protocol comprised two trials: eyes open and eyes closed, each lasting 60 seconds.
Electroencephalogram (EEG) data were collected using a portable, wireless system (mBrainTrain®, Belgrade, Serbia). Following the international 10-20 system, Ag/AgCl electrodes were placed on the scalp at positions including Fp1, Fp2, AFz, F3, Fz, F4, T7, C3, Cz, C4, T8, CPz, P7, P3, Pz, P4, P8, POz, O1, O2, M1, and M2, with FPz as the ground and FCz as the reference.
Preprocessing used the EEGLab toolbox and included visual artifact detection, bandpass filtering (0.1–50 Hz), and independent component analysis (ICA) implemented via MATLAB R2022b scripts. ICA facilitated removal of artifacts such as eye blinks and muscle activity. EEG signals were filtered into five frequency bands: delta (1–4 Hz), theta (4–8 Hz), alpha (8–13 Hz), beta
(13–30 Hz), and gamma (30–50 Hz).

Statistical analysis employed custom MATLAB scripts enabling spectral power density computation and inferential testing.
 Results
A mixed ANOVA assessed absolute power spectral density across conditions, channels (24), and frequency bands, revealing significant effects (F (2.66,276) = 3.71, p = 0.0001, η² = 0.26). Dependent t-tests comparing brain regions identified distinct topographical variations.




 



 
Note: EO= eye open, EC=eye closed
 
There are no differences in the Delta band between the control condition and static postural control with eyes open or closed.
 Conclusion
The sensorimotor cortex, parietal cortex, left occipital, temporal, central-parietal, and parietal-occipital regions collectively contribute to static postural regulation. During static balance control, the parietal cortex exhibited oscillations across theta, alpha, beta, and gamma bands regardless of visual manipulation context.
A particularly notable finding was the significant increase of gamma band activity in the parietal lobe (P3) and frontal lobe (F7) when contrasting eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions. This supports the hypothesis that gamma oscillations in these cortical areas facilitate preparatory motor responses necessary for balance maintenance.
Consistent with these results, Slobounov et al. (2005) documented heightened gamma activity at 40 Hz in frontal and central regions preceding compensatory postural adjustments during impaired balance conditions.
Keywords: Somatosensory, Parietal Cortex, Frontal Lobe, Aging
 Article Message
This study highlights the critical role of cortical oscillations in sustaining static posture in older adults, especially under visual input manipulation. Parietal, sensorimotor, frontal, and occipital cortices prominently contribute, reflecting a shift toward cortical conscious control mechanisms rather than automatic subcortical processes. This adaptive neurophysiological strategy likely compensates for age-related sensory and neuromuscular declines. Understanding these mechanisms underscores the necessity for brain-centered rehabilitation and balance training designs aimed at fall risk reduction and functional independence enhancement in the elderly.
 
Ethical Considerations
This investigation was approved by the Shahid Beheshti University Ethics Committee (Code: IR.SBU.REC.1400.103).
Authors’ Contributions
Conceptualization: Saeed Alboghebeish, Mahin Aghdaei, Reza Khosrowabadi, Alireza Farsi
Data Collection: Saeed Alboghebeish, Alireza Farsi
Data Analysis: Saeed Alboghebeish, Reza Khosrowabadi, Alireza Farsi
Manuscript Writing: Saeed Alboghebeish, Mahin Aghdaei, Reza Khosrowabadi, Alireza Farsi
Review and Editing: Saeed Alboghebeish, Mahin Aghdaei, Reza Khosrowabadi, Alireza Farsi
Funding Responsibility: Saeed Alboghebeish, Alireza Farsi
Literature Review: Saeed Alboghebeish, Mahin Aghdaei, Reza Khosrowabadi, Alireza Farsi
Project Management: Saeed Alboghebeish, Alireza Farsi

Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge all participants who contributed to this research.
 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Somatosensory
Parietal Cortex
Frontal Lobe
Aging
 
1.             Tse YYF, Petrofsky JS, Berk L, Daher N, Lohman E, Laymon MS, et al. Postural sway and rhythmic electroencephalography analysis of cortical activation during eight balance training tasks. Medical science monitor: international Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research. 2013;19:175. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.883824
2.             Takeda K, Mani H, Hasegawa N, Sato Y, Tanaka S, Maejima H, et al. Adaptation effects in static postural control by providing simultaneous visual feedback of center of pressure and center of gravity. Journal of Physiological Anthropology. 2017;36(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40101-017-0147-5
3.             Choi H-S, Kim Y-H. The relationship among the center of pressure, the center of mass and the horizontal acceleration of the body in postural sway, falling and walking. Advanced Nondestructive Evaluation II: Volume 1: World Scientific; 2008. pp. 133-8. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812790194_0023
4.             Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Motor control: translating research into clinical practice: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.
5.             Slobounov S, Hallett M, Stanhope S, Shibasaki H. Role of cerebral cortex in human postural control: an EEG study. Clinical neurophysiology. 2005;116(2):315-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2004.09.007
6.             Lakhani B, Mansfield A. Visual feedback of the centre of gravity to optimize standing balance. Gait & Posture. 2015;41(2):499-503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.12.003
7.             Keck ME, Pijnappels M, Schubert M, Colombo G, Curt A, Dietz V. Stumbling reactions in man: influence of corticospinal input. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Electromyography and Motor Control. 1998;109(3):215-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-980X(98)00009-5
8.             Cruz-Sanchez F, Moral A, Rossi M, Quinto L, Castejon C, Tolosa E, et al. Synaptophysin in spinal anterior horn in aging and ALS: an immunohistological study. Journal of Neural Transmission. 1996;103: 1317-29.
9.             Horak F, Macpherson J. Handbook of physiology, Sec 12, Exercise: regulation and integration of multiple systems. 1996.
10.          Peterka RJ. Sensorimotor integration in human postural control. Journal of Neurophysiology. 2002;88(3):1097-118. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.2002.88.3.1097
11.          Iwai K, Mori N, Oie M, Yamamoto N, Fujii M. Human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 tax protein activates transcription through AP-1 site by inducing DNA binding activity in T cells. Virology. 2001;279(1):38-46. https://doi.org/10.1006/viro.2000.0669
12.          Anand V, Buckley JG, Scally A, Elliott DB. Postural stability changes in the elderly with cataract simulation and refractive blur. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2003;44(11):4670-5. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.03-0455
13.          Jeka J, Schöner G, Dijkstra T, Ribeiro P, Lackner JR. Coupling of fingertip somatosensory information to head and body sway. Experimental Brain Research. 1997;113: 475–483.
14.          Eiken H, Øie E, Damås J, Yndestad A, Bjerkeli V, Aass H, et al. Myocardial gene expression of leukaemia inhibitory factor, interleukin‐6 and glycoprotein 130 in end‐stage human heart failure. European Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2001;31(5):389-97.  
15.          Jacobs JV, Horak FB. Cortical control of postural responses. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2007;114(10):1339-48. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00702-007-0657-0
16.          Gloor P. Neuronal generators and the problem of localization in electroencephalography: application of volume conductor theory to electroencephalography. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology. 1985;2(4):327-54.
17.          Stevens RH, Galloway TL, Wang P, Berka C. Cognitive neurophysiologic synchronies: What can they contribute to the study of teamwork? Human Factors. 2012;54(4):489-502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720811427296
18.          Dorneich MC, Whitlow SD, Mathan S, Ververs PM, Erdogmus D, Adami A, et al. Supporting real-time cognitive state classification on a mobile individual. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making. 2007;1(3):240-70. https://doi.org/10.1518/155534307X2556.
19.          Petrofsky J, Lee S, Bweir S. Gait characteristics in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 2005;93(5):640-7. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00421-004-1246-7
20.          Petrofsky JS, Cuneo M, Lee S, Johnson E, Lohman E. Correlation between gait and balance in people with and without Type 2 diabetes in normal and subdued light. Medical science Monitor: International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research. 2006;12(7):CR273-81.
21.          Liaw M-Y, Chen C-L, Pei Y-C, Leong C-P, Lau Y-C. Comparison of the static and dynamic balance performance in young, middle-aged, and elderly healthy people. Chang Gung Med J. 2009;32(3):297-304.
22.          Mochizuki G, Sibley K, Esposito J, Camilleri J, McIlroy W. Cortical responses associated with the preparation and reaction to full-body perturbations to upright stability. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2008;119(7):1626-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2008.03.020
23.          Adkin AL, Quant S, Maki BE, McIlroy WE. Cortical responses associated with predictable and unpredictable compensatory balance reactions. Experimental Brain Research. 2006;172(1):85-93. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00221-005-0310-9
24.          Petrofsky JS, Khowailed IA. Postural sway and motor control in trans-tibial amputees as assessed by electroencephalography during eight balance training tasks. Medical Science Monitor: International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research. 2014;20:2695. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.891361
25.          Prentice SD, Drew T. Contributions of the reticulospinal system to the postural adjustments occurring during voluntary gait modifications. Journal of Neurophysiology. 2001;85(2):679-98. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.2001.85.2.679
26.          Doyon J, Gaudreau D, Laforce Jr R, Castonguay M, Bedard P, Bedard F, et al. Role of the striatum, cerebellum, and frontal lobes in the learning of a visuomotor sequence. Brain and Cognition. 1997;34(2):218-45. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.1997.0899
27.          Dalpozzo F, Gérard P, De Pasqua V, Wang F, de Noordhout AM. Single motor axon conduction velocities of human upper and lower limb motor units: a study with transcranial electrical stimulation. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2002;113(2):284-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00732-5
28.          Polanía R, Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Modulating functional connectivity patterns and topological functional organization of the human brain with transcranial direct current stimulation. Human Brain Mapping. 2011;32(8):1236-49.  
https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.21104
29.          Power GA, Flaaten N, Dalton BH, Herzog W. Age-related maintenance of eccentric strength: a study of temperature dependence. Age. 2016;38:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-016-9905-2
30.          Bondareff W. The neural basis of aging. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1985.
31.          Hepple RT, Rice CL. Innervation and neuromuscular control in ageing skeletal muscle. The Journal of Physiology. 2016;594(8):1965-78. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP270561
32.          Hülsdünker T, Mierau A, Neeb C, Kleinöder H, Strüder H. Cortical processes associated with continuous balance control as revealed by EEG spectral power. Neuroscience Letters. 2015;592:1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2015.02.049
33.          Siéroff E, Piquard A, Auclair L, Lacomblez L, Derouesné C, Laberge D. Deficit of preparatory attention in frontotemporal dementia. Brain and Cognition. 2004; 1;55(3):444-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2004.02.063
34.          Cohen A, Ivry RI, Keele SW. Attention and structure in sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1990;16(1):17. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.16.1.17
35.          Parsaei S, Shetab Bushehri N, Alboghebish S, Rezaeimanesh S, Barati P. Effect of neurofeedback training on im-provement of reaction time in elderly, passive males. Iranian Journal of Ageing. 2016;11(4):550-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.21859/sija-1104550
36.          Popovych S, Rosjat N, Toth TI, Wang BA, Liu L, Abdollahi RO, et al. Movement-related phase locking in the delta–theta frequency band. NeuroImage. 2016;139:439-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.06.052
37.          Craig CE, Goble DJ, Doumas M. Proprioceptive acuity predicts muscle co-contraction of the tibialis anterior and gastrocnemius medialis in older adults’ dynamic postural control. Neuroscience. 2016;322:251-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.02.036
دوره 17، شماره 60
تابستان 1404
صفحه 71-86

  • تاریخ دریافت 15 تیر 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری 25 دی 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش 11 اردیبهشت 1403