بررسی و مقایسه فعالیت بدنی سلامت‌محور و رفتار بی‌تحرکی در بزرگسالان و سالمندان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه تربیت‌بدنی، واحد رودهن، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، رودهن، ایران

2 استادیار گروه تربیت‌بدنی، دانشگاه صنعتی خواجه نصیرالدین طوسی، تهران، ایران.

3 کارشناس ارشد، گروه تربیت‌بدنی، واحد تبریز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تبریز، ایران

4 استادیار گروه تربیت‌بدنی، واحد اسلامشهر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اسلامشهر، ایران

5 دانشیار گروه تربیت‌بدنی، واحد تبریز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تبریز، ایران

10.22089/mbj.2025.16861.2165
چکیده
با توجه به تأثیر بسیار مهم مشارکت در فعالیت بدنی یا بی‌تحرکی بر سلامت جسمانی و روانی، تحقیق حاضر درصدد بررسی و مقایسه وضعیت فعالیت بدنی سلامت‌محور (سطح متوسط-تا-شدید فعالیت بدنی) و رفتار بی‌تحرکی در بزرگسالان و سالمندان بود. آزمودنی‌های تحقیق، 384 بزرگسال (192 زن) و 384 سالمند (192 زن) استان گلستان بودند که به روش نمونه‌گیری دردسترس انتخاب شد. از پرسشنامه IPAQ برای اندازه‌گیری فعالیت بدنی سلامت‌محور و رفتار بی‌تحرکی استفاده شد. داده‌ها با استفاده از آزمون‌های تی تک‌نمونه‌ای، تی مستقل و خی دو تحلیل شدند. نتایج نشان داد، بیش از نیمی از بزرگسالان و سالمندان در فعالیت بدنی سلامت‌محور شرکت نمی‌کنند. همچنین زنان نسبت به مردان فعالیت بدنی سلامت‌محور پایین‌تری دارند. به‌علاوه، بزرگسالان و سالمندان زمان بی‌تحرکی زیادی دارند که در این بین زنان نسبت به مردان زمان بی‌تحرکی بیشتری دارند. همچنین سالمندان نسبت به بزرگسالان فعالیت بدنی سلامت‌محور پایین‌تر و زمان بی‌تحرکی بیشتری دارند. درمجموع، نتایج تحقیق نشان می‌دهد که اتخاذ سیاست‌ها و استراتژی‌هایی برای توسعه مشارکت بزرگسالان و سالمندان در فعالیت بدنی سلامت‌محور، ضرورت دارد. این استراتژی‌ها و مداخلات باید تأکید ویژه‌ای بر مشارکت بانوان در فعالیت بدنی سلامت‌محور داشته باشند؛ بنابراین ضروری است که متولیان امر، شهرداری‌ها، و حوزه‌های فرهنگی راهکارهای لازم برای ارتقای مشارکت بزرگسالان و سالمندان در فعالیت بدنی سلامت‌محور را بیابند و اجرا کنند؛ زیرا می‌تواند پیامدهای مثبتی برای سلامت جسمانی و روانی آن‌ها داشته باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

An Investigation and Comparison of Health-Oriented Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior among Adults and the Elderly

نویسندگان English

zahra Alam 1
Sholah Khodadad Kashi 2
Ali Sadeghian 3
zahra chaharbaghi 4
Amir Dana 5
1 1. Assistant Professor, Department of Physical Education, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran
2 Assistant Professor of Physical Education Department, K. N Tousi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
3 Department of Physical Education, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
4 Assistant Professor, Department of Physical Education, Islamshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Islamshahr, Iran
5 Associate Professor, Department of Physical Education, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran.
چکیده English

Extended Abstract
Background and Purpose
Physical activity plays a vital role in maintaining overall health, well-being, and a healthy lifestyle (1). In adults, regular physical activity improves coordination, reduces the risk of falls, decreases social isolation, and strengthens social connections. The most effective strategy for health maintenance and prevention of non-communicable diseases—such as cardiovascular diseases, respiratory illnesses, diabetes, and cancers—is engaging in moderate to vigorous physical activity, commonly defined as health-oriented exercise (4). The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends for adults and older adults a minimum of 150 minutes per week of moderate-intensity aerobic activity or 75 minutes of vigorous aerobic activity, or an equivalent combination, alongside muscle-strengthening exercises on at least two days per week (5). Nevertheless, modern lifestyles have fostered sedentary behaviors evident across all age groups, from childhood to old age. Approximately one-third of the global population fails to meet WHO physical activity guidelines, with inactivity rates notably higher in high-income countries and among older populations (19). In Iran, studies have reported relatively low physical activity levels among adults and elderly individuals (21). However, most prior research has focused on general physical activity rather than health-oriented physical activity specifying moderate to vigorous intensities. This study aimed to investigate and compare health-oriented physical activity and sedentary behaviors among adults and elderly populations in Iran, with particular focus on gender-related differences.
Materials and Methods
This applied research adopts a descriptive-comparative methodology. The sample comprised 768 participants—384 adults (192 men, 192 women) and 384 elderly (192 men, 192 women)—selected via convenience sampling from the cities of Bandar Torkaman, Gorgan, Aliabad Katul, Gonbad, and Kalaleh. Physical activity levels over the previous week were assessed using the short form of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), which captures multiple activity domains, including occupational tasks, transportation, household chores, and leisure activities, quantifying vigorous, moderate, and light intensity activity. Individual activity levels were initially quantified using metabolic equivalent (MET) values, then classified into vigorous, moderate, or light categories accordingly. Descriptive statistics including mean, standard deviation, frequency, and percentage were used to characterize variables. Normality was evaluated with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. One-sample t-tests assessed differences in health-oriented physical activity relative to WHO standards. Independent t-tests evaluated gender differences in demographic variables, and Chi-square tests analyzed gender differences in physical activity categories. The significance threshold was set at 0.05.
 Findings
As shown in Table 1, among adults, 20% of men and 14% of women engaged in vigorous physical activity, with men significantly more active than women (p<0.001). For moderate activity, 28% of men and 21% of women participated, again with males significantly exceeding females (p<0.001). Conversely, 52% of men and 65% of women engaged in light physical activity, with females significantly more active in this intensity (p<0.001). Among the elderly, only 6% of men and 4% of women performed vigorous activity, with no significant gender difference detected (p>0.05). Moderate activity involved 39% of men and 29% of women, with men significantly more active (p<0.001). Light physical activity was reported by 55% of men and 67% of women, with females engaging significantly more (p<0.001). Comparisons between age groups revealed that adults exhibited significantly higher levels of vigorous (t=25.473, p<0.001), moderate (t=19.257, p<0.001), and light (t=7.660, p<0.001) physical activity relative to elderly individuals. Additionally, adults demonstrated significantly lower sedentary durations than the elderly population (t=38.143, p<0.001).
 
Conclusion
Less than half of adults and elderly individuals engage in health-oriented physical activity, indicating a generally low level of participation within Golestan Province. This finding is consistent with prior studies (17,25) reporting limited engagement in health-focused exercise among these populations. One possible explanation is that adulthood and aging involve substantially increased life responsibilities relative to childhood, imposing greater cognitive demands that constrain time available for leisure activities, including exercise (13,18). Additional barriers to participation among adults and elderly include time limitations due to work or educational commitments, lack of motivation, age-related beliefs such as "I am too old," and the presence of injuries or chronic illnesses. Physical ailments that cause discomfort during movement—such as obesity, back pain, or chronic fatigue—also represent significant impediments to regular physical activity. Moreover, a pronounced gender disparity exists, with men demonstrating higher participation levels in health-oriented physical activities than women. This observation aligns with earlier research (19,23) showing consistently greater male involvement in physical activity. Factors underlying lower female participation may include inadequate access to women’s sports facilities, socio-cultural constraints, and safety concerns related to engaging in physical activities in public spaces (29).
Article Message
This study assessed health-oriented physical activity among adults and elderly populations in Golestan Province, Iran, revealing a notable deficiency, with fewer than half meeting recommended activity standards. Adults exhibit higher activity levels compared to the elderly, and men consistently outperform women in moderate and vigorous physical activity. These findings underscore the urgent necessity for targeted interventions to promote health-oriented physical activity, particularly focusing on increasing participation among elderly individuals and women, to combat sedentary lifestyles and improve public health outcomes in the region.
 Ethical Considerations
The study was conducted in full compliance with applicable research ethics standards.
Authors’ Contributions

Conceptualization: Zahra Alam, Zahra Chaharbaghi
Data Collection: Zahra Chaharbaghi, Ali Sadeghian, Sholeh Khodadad Kashi
Data Analysis: Amir Dana, Zahra Chaharbaghi
Manuscript Writing: Sholeh Khodadad Kashi, Zahra Alam, Zahra Chaharbaghi
Review and Editing: Amir Dana, Zahra Alam
Literature Review: Sholeh Khodadad Kashi, Ali Sadeghian
Project Management: Zahra Chaharbaghi

Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.
 
Acknowledgments
The authors sincerely thank all participants for their invaluable contributions to this research.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Physical Activity, Health, Adults, Seniors, Physical Inactivity
1.       Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christenson GM. Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: Definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Rep. 1985; 100:126-31.
2.       Thivel D, Tremblay A, Genin PM, Panahi S, Rivière D, Duclos M. Physical activity, inactivity, and sedentary behaviors: Definitions and implications in occupational health. Front Public Health. 2018;6:288. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00288
3.       Janssen I, LeBlanc AG. Systematic review of the health benefits of physical activity and fitness in school-aged children and youth. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7:40. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-7-40
4.       Marker AM, Steele RG, Noser AE. Physical activity and health-related quality of life in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Psychol. 2018; 37:893-903. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000653
5.       Poitras VJ, et al. Systematic review of the relationships between objectively measured physical activity and health indicators in school-aged children and youth. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016; 41:197-239. https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2015-0663
6.       Warburton DER, Bredin SSD. Health benefits of physical activity: a systematic review of current systematic reviews. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2017; 32:541-56. https://doi.org/10.1097/hco.0000000000000437
7.       Huotari P, Nupponen H, Mikkelsson L, Laakso L, Kujala U. Adolescent physical fitness and activity as predictors of adulthood activity. J Sports Sci. 2011; 29:1135-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2011.585166
8.       Telama R, Yang X, Viikari J, Välimäki I, Wanne O, Raitakari O. Physical activity from childhood to adulthood: A 21-year tracking study. Am J Prev Med. 2005; 28:267-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.12.003
9.       Bull FC, et al. World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54(24):1451-62. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2020-102955
10.    Muthuri SK, et al. Temporal trends and correlates of physical activity, sedentary behavior, and physical fitness among school-aged children in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11:3327-59. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110303327
11.    Migueles JH, Cadenas-Sanchez C, Alcantara JMA, Leal-Martín J, Mañas A, Ara I, Glynn NW, Shiroma EJ. Calibration and cross-validation of accelerometer cut-points to classify sedentary time and physical activity from hip and non-dominant and dominant wrists in older adults. Sensors. 2021;21:3326. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21103326
12.    Wijndaele K, Westgate K, Stephens SK, Blair SN, Bull FC, Chastin SF, Dunstan DW, Ekelund U, Esliger DW, Freedson PS, Granat MH. Utilization and harmonization of adult accelerometry data: Review and expert consensus. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015; 47:2129-39. https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000000661
13.    Farrahi V, Niemelä M, Kangas M, Korpelainen R, Jämsä T. Calibration and validation of accelerometer-based activity monitors: A systematic review of machine-learning approaches. Gait Posture. 2019; 68:285-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.12.003
14.    Trost S, Rice K, Pfeiffer K. Comparison of wrist accelerometer cut-points for classifying physical activity intensity in youth. J Sci Med Sport. 2017;20: e104-5. https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0b013e318206476e
15.    Meyer K, Niemann S, Abel T. Gender differences in physical activity and fitness - association with self-reported health and health-relevant attitudes in a middle-aged Swiss urban population. J Public Health. 2004; 12:283-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-004-0042-5
16.    Li X, Wang P, Jiang Y, Yang Y, Wang F, Yan F, Li M, Peng W, Wang Y. Physical activity and health-related quality of life in older adults: depression as a mediator. BMC Geriatr. 2024;24(1):26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04452-6
17.    Seo J, An S, Kim D. Effect of Physical Activity on Health-Related Quality of Life of Older Adults Using Newly Developed Health-Related Quality of Life Tool for the Korean Population. Healthcare (Basel). 2023;11(15):2192.
18.    Acree LS, Longfors J, Fjeldstad AS, Fjeldstad C, Schank B, Nickel KJ, Montgomery PS, Gardner AW. Physical activity is related to quality of life in older adults. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006; 4:37. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-4-37
19.    Koolhaas CM, Dhana K, van Rooij FJA, Schoufour JD, Hofman A, Franco OH. Physical Activity Types and Health-Related Quality of Life among Middle-Aged and Elderly Adults: The Rotterdam Study. J Nutr Health Aging. 2018;22(2):246-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-017-0902-7
20.    Langhammer B, Bergland A, Rydwik E. The Importance of Physical Activity Exercise among Older People. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:7856823. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7856823
21.    Psarrou A, Adamakidou T, Apostolara P, Koreli A, Drakopoulou M, Plakas S, Mastrogiannis D, Mantoudi A, Parissopoulos S, Zartaloudi A, Mantzorou M. Associations between Physical Activity and Health-Related Quality of Life among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study in Urban Greece. Geriatrics (Basel). 2023;8(3):61. https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics8030061
22.    Taylor AH, Cable NT, Faulkner G, Hillsdon M, Narici M, Van Der Bij AK. Physical activity and older adults: a review of health benefits and the effectiveness of interventions. J Sports Sci. 2004;22(8):703-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410410001712421
23.    Buchner DM, Beresford SA, Larson EB, LaCroix AZ, Wagner EH. Effects of physical activity on health status in older adults. II. Intervention studies. Annu Rev Public Health. 1992; 13:469-88. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pu.13.050192.002345
24.    Lim SER, Ibrahim K, Sayer AA, Roberts HC. Assessment of Physical Activity of Hospitalised Older Adults: A Systematic Review. J Nutr Health Aging. 2018;22(3):377-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-017-0931-2
25.    Rejeski WJ, Mihalko SL. Physical activity and quality of life in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56(2):23-35. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/56.suppl_2.23
26.    Teraž K, Pišot S, Šimunic B, Pišot R. Does an active lifestyle matter? A longitudinal study of physical activity and health-related determinants in older adults. Front Public Health. 2022; 10:975608. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.975608
27.    Andrade C. Physical Exercise and Health, 6: Sedentary Time, Independent of Health-Related Physical Activity, as a Risk Factor for Dementia in Older Adults. J Clin Psychiatry. 2024;85(1):24f15270. https://doi.org/10.4088/jcp.24f15270
28.    Motl RW, McAuley E. Physical activity, disability, and quality of life in older adults. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2010;21(2):299-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2009.12.006
29.    Halaweh H, Willen C, Grimby-Ekman A, Svantesson U. Physical Activity and Health-Related Quality of Life Among Community Dwelling Elderly. J Clin Med Res. 2015;7(11):845-52. https://doi.org/10.14740/jocmr2307w
30.    Aoyagi Y, Park H, Park S, Shephard RJ. Habitual physical activity and health-related quality of life in older adults: interactions between the amount and intensity of activity (the Nakanojo Study). Qual Life Res. 2010;19(3):333-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9588-6
دوره 17، شماره 61
پاییز 1404
صفحه 33-48

  • تاریخ دریافت 28 خرداد 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 13 اردیبهشت 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 19 خرداد 1404