نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار دانشگاه اراک

2 کارشناس ارشد دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز

چکیده

یکی از جنبه‌های تاریک فعالیت بدنی، وابستگی به تمرین است. این تحقیق با هدف رواسازی مقیاس وابستگی به تمرین-تجدید نظرشده انجام شد. جامعة آماری را شرکت‌کنندگان در فعالیت بدنی منظم در شهر کرمانشاه با هدف قهرمانی و ورزش همگانی تشکیل دادند. نمونه 307 نفر و در دسترس انتخاب شد که 155 نفر (%5/50) مرد و 152 نفر (%5/49) زن بودند. داده‌ها با 1) پرسشنامة مشخصات فردی و 2)مقیاس وابستگی به تمرین- تجدید نظرشدة سیمون‌داونس و همکاران (2004) جمع‌آوری شد. برای تجزیه و تحلیل آماری از محاسبة میانگین و انحراف استاندارد و برای آزمودن روایی سازه (عاملی)، از روش تحلیل عاملی تأییدی مبتنی بر مدل معادلات ساختاری استفاده شد. ضریب همبستگی پیرسون و آلفای کرونباخ به ترتیب برای محاسبة پایایی آزمون مجدد و همسانی درونی استفاده شد.
نتایج شاخص ریشة میانگین مجذور برآورد تقریب (RMSEA) 039/0 بود که زیر شاخص 05/0 می‌باشد. شاخص برازش مقایسه‌ای بنتلر (CFI) و شاخص برازش تاکر لویس یا غیرهنجاری بنتلر - بونت (TLI/NNFI) به ترتیب 95/0 و 93/0 بود. براساس نتایج، اندازة شاخص‌های برازندگی مدل اندازه‌گیری مرتبة دوّم مقیاس وابستگی به تمرین تجدید نظرشده، قابل قبول بود و از پرسشنامة اصلی 7-عاملی و 21-گویه‌ای حمایت کرد. ضریب همبستگی پیرسون، پایایی کل مقیاس را تأیید کرد (94/0) و آلفای کرونباخ برای کل مقیاس نیز 86/0 به دست آمد که این نتایج، روایی و پایایی نسخة فارسی مقیاس وابستگی به تمرین –تجدید نظر شده را تأیید کرد. از این پرسشنامه می‌توان برای اهداف آموزشی و پژوهشی استفاده کرد.
واژگان کلیدی؛ وابستگی به تمرین، مقیاس، روایی، پایایی، فعالیت بدنی

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Validity and Reliability of Farsi Translated of "Exercise Dependence Scale-Revised"

نویسندگان [English]

  • Darush Khajavi 1
  • Ghobad Mehrabian 2

چکیده [English]

One of the dark aspects of physical activity is exercise dependence. The study performed to validate the "Exercise Dependence Scale-Revised". Population was participants in physical activities in Kermanshah city that exercised with two purposes: athletic and sport for all. Samples were 307 participants selected availably that 155 participants (50.5%) were male and 152 participants (49.5%) were women. Data were collected by demographic questionnaire and Symons Downs, Hausenblas, & Nigg's "Exercise Dependence Scale-Revised". For data analysis mean and SD calculated and for construct validity (factorial) examination confirmatory factor analysis based on structural equations model were used. Pearson correlation coefficient and Cronbach's alpha used for test-retest reliability and internal consistency calculation, respectively.
Finding of RMSEA was .039 that was under .05. CFI and TLI/NNFI measures were .95 and .93, respectively. According the results, goodness of fit measures of second-order of "Exercise Dependence Scale-Revised" was acceptable and supported 7-factor and 21-item structure of original questionnaire. Pearson correlation coefficient confirmed test-retest reliability of the scale (.94) and Cronbach's alpha for Scale was .96 that confirmed validity and reliability of the "Exercise Dependence Scale-Revised". The scale can be used with clinical, educational and research purposes.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Exercise Dependence
  • Scale
  • Validity
  • Reliability
1. Tenenbaum G & Eklund R. Handbook of sport psychology. 3rd ed. New Jersey: John­; 2007. p 608-10.
2. Hausenblas H A & Symons Downs D. Exercise dependence: A systematic review. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2002a; 3(2): 89–123.
3. Kerr J H, Lindner K J, Blaydon M. Exercise Dependence. New York: Routledge; ­2007.
4. Hausenblas H A­, Symons Downs D. How much is too much? The development and validation of the Exercise Dependence Scale. Psychology and Health: An International Journal. 2002b; 17(4): 387–404.
5. Symons Downs D, Hausenblas H A, Nigg C R. Factorial validity and psychometric examination of the exercise dependence scale-revised. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science. 2004; 8(4): 183–201
6. Moran A. Sport and exercise psychology, A critical introduction. London and New York­: Routledge; 2004, p 226.
7. Hannus A. Preliminary evidence for relations between motivation and beliefs related to exercise dependence. Acta Kinesiologiae Universitatis Tartuensis. 2012; 18: 68–83.
8. Pierce E F, McGowan R W, Lynn T D. Exercise dependence in relation to competitive orientation of runners. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1993­­; 33(2): 189-93.
9. Khajavi D, Kavoosi Aslansha MA. Relationship of sport orientation and exercise a­ddiction of championship level athletes: A preliminary study. Sport Psychology Studies. 2014; 3(7): 15-30. (In Persian).
10. Carmack M A­, Martens R. Measuring commitment to running: A survey of runners’ attitudes and mental states. Journal of Sport Psychology. 1979; 1(1): 25–42.
11. Davis C­, Brewer­ H­, ­Ratusny D. Behavioral frequency and psychological commitment: Necessary concepts in the study of excessive exercising. Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 1993; 16(6): 611–28.
12. Davis C­, Kennedy S H­, Ralevski E­, Dionne M­­, Brewer H­, Neitzert C­, et al. Obsessive compulsiveness and physical activity in anorexia nervosa and high-level exercising. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 1995; 39(8): 967–76.
13. Hailey B J­, Bailey L A. Negative addiction in runners: A quantitative approach. Journal of Sport Behavior. 1982; 5(3): 150–4.
14. Rudy E B­, ­Estok P J. Intensity of jogging: Its relationship to selected physical and psychosocial variables in women. Western Journal of Nursing Research. 1983; 5(4): 325–36.
15. Chapman C L­, ­DeCastro J M. Running addiction: Measurement and associated psychological characteristics. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness. 1990; 30(3): 283–90.
16. Ogden J­, Veale D­, ­Summers Z. The development and validation of the Exercise Dependence Questionnaire. Addiction Research. 1997; 5(4): 343–56.
17. Terry A­, Szabo A­, ­Griffiths M D. The exercise addiction inventory: A new brief screening tool. Addiction Research and Theory. 2004; 12(5): 489–99.
18. Griffiths M D. Behavioural addiction: An issue for everybody? Journal of Workplace Learning. 1996; 8(3): 19–25.
19. Szabo A, Griffiths M D. Exercise addiction in British sport science students. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. 2007; 5(1): 25-28.
20. de la Torre J. ­Menssana in corporesano, or exercise abuse? Clinical considerations. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic. 1995; 59(1): 15–31.
21. Martin K A­, ­Hausenblas H A. Psychological commitment to exercise and eating disorder symptomology among female aerobics instructors. The Sport Psychologist. 1998; 12(2): 180–90.
22. Szabo A­, Frenkl R­, ­Caputo A. Relationship between addiction to running, commitment, and deprivation from running: A study on the internet. European Yearbook of Sport Psychology. 1997; 1: 130–47.
23. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. ­4th ed.­ Washington, DC: Author; 1994.
24. Mónok K­, Berczik K­, Urbán R­, Szabó A­, Griffiths M D­, Farkas J­, et al. Psychometric properties and concurrent validity of two exercise addiction measures: A population wide study in Hungary. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2012; 13(6): 739-46.
25. Lindwall M, Palmeira A. Factorial validity and invariance testing of the Exercise Dependence Scale-Revised in Swedish and Portuguese exercisers. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science­. 2011­; 13(3); 166–79.
26. Sicilia A, Gonzalez-Cutre D. Dependence and physical exercise: Spanish validation of the ExerciseDependence Scale-Revised (EDS-R). Span J Psychol. 2011­; 14(1): 421-31.
27. Costa S­, Cuzzocrea F­, Hausenblas H A, Larcan R­, Oliva P. Psychometric examination and factorial validity of the Exercise Dependence Scale-Revised in Italian exercisers. Journal of Behavioral Addictions. 2012; 1(4): 1-5.
28. Allegre B­, Therme P. Confirmation study of a French version of the Exercise Dependence Scale-revised with a French population. Encephale. 2008; 34(5)­: 490­–­5.
29. Parastatidou I S­, Doganis G­, Theodorakis Y­, Vlachopoulos S P. Addicted to exercise: Psychometric properties of the Exercise Dependence Scale-Revised in a sample of Greek exercise participants. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 2012; 28(1): 3-10.
30. Müller A­, Claes L­, Smits D­, Gefeller O­, Hilbert A­, Herberg A­, et al. Validation of the German v­ersion of the Exercise Dependence Scale. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 2013; 29(3): 213-9.
31. Khajavi D, Kavoosi Aslanshah M. Translation and psychometric properties of Persian version of ­Exercise Addiction Inventory-Short Form­. Sport Psychology Studies. 2014; 2(6): 49-62. (In Persian).