رفتار حرکتی

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

هزینه های دریافت نشریه

راهنمای نویسندگان

فرم ها

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

مقایسۀ آموزش راهبردهای یادگیری خودتنظیم بر یادگیری مهارت سرویس والیبال

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار رفتار حرکتی، دانشگاه الزهرا

2 استادیار روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه یزد

3 کارشناس‌ارشد رفتار حرکتی ـ آموزش تربیت‌بدنی، دانشگاه یزد

چکیده

هدف از پژوهش حاضر، مقایسۀ آموزش راهبردهای یادگیری خودتنظیم در مراحل مختلف خودتنظیم (شامل: مراحل دوراندیشی، ‌‌عملکرد و خوداندیشی) بر مراحل اکتساب، یادداری و انتقال مهارت سرویس والیبال بود. آزمودنی‌ها 55 دانشجوی دختر دانشگاه یزد (با میانگین سنی 03/1±20 سال) بودند که به‌صورت تصادفی به پنج گروه (سه گروه راهبردهای یادگیری خودتنظیم و دو گروه کنترل بدون تمرین و با‌ تمرین) تقسیم شدند و سرویس والیبال را اجرا کردند. آزمودنی‌ها پس از شرکت در پیش‌آزمون در مرحلۀ اکتساب، 12 بلوک 10 کوششی را تمرین نمودند. سپس، در آزمون اکتساب (با همان شرایط پیش‌آزمون) شرکت کردند. درادامه، (پس از یک هفته) یک بلوک 10 کوششی را در آزمون یادداری و انتقال تمرین نمودند. داده‌ها در مرحلۀ اکتساب با استفاده از آزمون تحلیل واریانس یک‌راهه با اندازه‌گیری مکرر در یک طرح (6*4) تحلیل گردید و برای بررسی داده‌های حاصل از آزمون‌های اکتساب، یادداری و انتقال از تحلیل واریانس یک‌راهه و همچنین، به‌منظور شناسایی تفاوت‌ها از آزمون تعقیبی بونفرونی استفاده گردید. نتایج تفاوت معناداری را در گروه‌های تمرینی که از راهبردهای خودتنظیمی بهره گرفتند نسبت به سایر گروه‌هادر مراحل اکتساب، آزمون‌های اکتساب، یادداری و انتقال نشان می‌دهد؛ به‌عبارت‌دیگر، گروه‌های راهبردهای خودتنظیم که از مرحلۀ خودارزیابی و خودواکنشی بهره برده‌اند، عملکرد بهتری داشته‌اند. این یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهد که راهبردهای یادگیری خودتنظیم، عامل مؤثری در پیشرفت عملکرد و یادگیری مهارت‌های حرکتی است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Comparing of Self-Regulated Learning Strategies on the Learning of Volleyball Service

نویسندگان [English]

  • Roza Rahavi Ezabadi 1
  • hamidreza fallah Yakhdani 2
  • Parisa Moshiri 3

1 Assistant Professor of Motor Behavior, Alzahra University

2 Assistant Professor of Psychology & Educational Sciences, Yazd University

3 M.Sc. of Motor Behavior- Learning Physical Education, Yazd University

چکیده [English]

The purpose of present study was to determine effect of self-regulation learning strategies in various phases of self-regulation including forethoughtful, performance and self-reflection phases, on the acquisition, retention and transfer of volleyball service. The subjects were consist of 55 female students of Yazd university with average age of 20 ± 1.03 years. They were randomly diveded into 5 groups, which three of them were self-regulation learning strategies groups and two of them were practice-only and no-practice control groups and performed volleyball service. After the pre-test, subjects were practiced 12 blocks of 10 trials in acquisition phase. Then, they took part in the post test with the same pre-test condition. After a week, they participated in retention and transfer tests and subjects were practiced 1 block of 10 trials. The data were analyzed by one way ANOVA with reapeted measure on a plot (4*6) in acquisition phase .In acqusition, retention and transfer tests the data were analyzed by one way ANOVA, Bonferroni post hoc test. The results showed that there is a significant difference between the self-regulation strategies practice groups and various groups in the acquisition phase, acquisition, retention and transfer tests. In other words, the self-regulation strategies groups that were used from the self- assessment and self-reaction phases, they had better performance in comparison to others. These findings suggested that self-regulation learning strategies are the effective factors in the enhancement of performance and learning movement skills.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Acquisition
  • Retention
  • Self-Regulation Strategies
  • Transfer
  • Volleyball Service
مراجع
1. Schmidt R A. Motor learning and performance: From principles to practice. The University of Virginia: 9, illustrated, Human Kinetics Pub; 1991. P. 134-40.
2. Rahavi R, Shojaei M, Estiri Z. The effect of two types of interference before performance and during performance on learning of generalized motor program and parameter in basketball fundamental skills. Development and Motor Learning (Harakat). 2013; 5(2): 107-24. (In Persian).
3. Parviz K, Sharifi M. Relationship between cognitive and metacognitive strategies and educational success in urban and rural high school students. Iranian Quarterly of Education Strategies. 2011; 4(1): 1-6. (In Persian).
4. Flavell J H. Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. The Nature of Intelligence. 1976; 12: 231-5.
5. Baker L, Brown A L. Metacognitive skill and reading. Handbook of Reading Research. 1984; 1(353): 394.
6. Niazazari K. Metacognition in teaching-learning process. First Edition, Tehran: Meta-Cognitive Thought; 2003. P. 97-103. (In Persian).
7. Zimmerman B J. Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal. 2008; 45(1): 166-83.
8. Wulf G. Self-controlled practice enhances motor learning: Implications for physiotherapy. Physiotherapy. 2007; 93(2): 96-101.
9. Zimmerman B J. Enhancing student academic and health functioning: A self-regulatory perspective. School Psychology Quarterly. 1996; 11(1): 47.
10. Cleary T J, Zimmerman B J, Keating T. Training physical education students to self-regulate during basketball free throw practice. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 2006; 77(2): 251-62.
11. Farsi A, Marghzar M, Aslankhani M. The impact of self-regulated and non-regulated learning strategies on acquisition, retention and transfer of skills table tennis forehand drive. Journal of Motor Behavior and Sport Psychology. 2010; 1(1): 397-407. (In Persian).
12. Theodosiou A, Mantis K, Papaioannou A. Student self-reports of metacognitive activity in physical education classes. Age-group differences and the effect of goal orientations and perceived motivational climate. Educational Research and Reviews. 2008; 3(12): 353-64.
13. Bhattacharya S, Neelam N, Tanksale D. Relationship between self-regulated learning strategy and motivation of management students. International Journal of Innovation and Learning. 2016; 19(2): 125-49.
14. Agustiani H, Cahyad S, Musa M. Self-efficacy and self-regulated learning as predictors of students academic performance. The Open Psychology Journal. 2016; 9(1): 1-6.
15. Lau C, Kitsantas A, Miller A. Using microanalysis to examine how elementary students self-regulate in Math: A case study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015; 174: 2226-33.
16. DiBenedetto M K, Zimmerman B J. Construct and predictive validity of microanalytic measures of students' self-regulation of science learning. Learning and Individual Differences. 2013; 26: 30-41.
17. Zimmerman B J. From cognitive modeling to self-regulation: A social cognitive career path. Educational Psychologist. 2013; 48(3): 135-47.
18. Rahmanian Z, VaezMousavi M. Psychometric properties of the Metacognition Applied to Physical Activity Scale. Sport Psychology Studies. 2014; 3(9): 11-26. (In Persian).
19. Besharat M A, Ghahremani M H, Naghipoor Givi B. Predictive role of self-regulation and impulsivity in sport achievement: A comparison between contact and noncontact sports. Motor Bihavior. 2015‌; 6(18): 131-46. (In Persian).
20. Settanni M, Magistro D, Rabaglietti E. Development and preliminary validation of an instrument to measure metacognition applied to physical activity during early adolescence. Cognition, Brain, Behavior an Interdisciplinary Journal. 2012; 16(1): 67-87.
21. Elbaum B E, Berg C A, Dodd D H. Previous learning experience, strategy beliefs, and task definition in self-regulated foreign language learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 1993; 18(3): 318-36.
22. Higgins E T. The "‌self digest"‌: Self-knowledge serving self-regulatory functions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1996; 71(6): 1062.
23. Zimmerman B J, Martinez-Pons M. Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology. 1990; 82(1): 51.
24. Todd T. A comparison of metacognitive and procedural knowledge of ball catching by physically awkward and non-awkward children. A Thesis for the Degree of Master of Arts (Education). Department of Physical Education, Faculty of Education, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; 1988.
25. Vaez Mousavi M, Gharakhanlou R, Kurdish M, Gaeini A, Alizadeh M, Kashef M, et al. Tests to measure fitness, skill and psychological elite athletes of different sports. 2en ed. Tehran: Waiting Age Publishing; 2011. P. 376-97. (In Persian).
26. Wulf G, McConnel N, Gärtner M, Schwarz A. Enhancing the learning of sport skills through external-focus feedback. Journal of Motor Behavior. 2002; 34(2): 171-82.
27. Kazemi F, Yektayar M, Bolban Abad A M. Investigation the impact of chess play on developing meta-cognitive ability and math problem-solving power of students at different levels of education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2012; 32: 372-9.
رفتار حرکتی
دوره 9، شماره 28 - شماره پیاپی 28
تابستان 1396
مرداد 1396
صفحه 155-172
فایل ها
سابقه مقاله
  • تاریخ دریافت: 29 شهریور 1395
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 27 دی 1395
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 06 بهمن 1395
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار