ارتباط بهرة هوشی و هوش هیجانی با تبحر حرکتی در پسران 14-10 سال شهر تهران

محمدی اورنگی, بهزاد; شهرزاد, ندا; یاعلی, رسول

doi:10.22089/mbj.2017.4313.1512

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

¹ دانشجوی دکتری یادگیری حرکتی، دانشگاه خوارزمی

² استادیار رفتار حرکتی، دانشگاه خوارزمی

https://doi.org/10.22089/mbj.2017.4313.1512

چکیده

قیود فردی از عواملی هستند که می‌توانند بر رشد حرکتی تأثیر بگذارند؛ بنابراین، هدف از انجام این پژوهش بررسی ارتباط بهرة هوشی و هوش هیجانی با تبحر حرکتی در پسران 14-10 سال است.همة پسران 14-10 سال شهر تهران جامعة پژوهش حاضر را تشکیل دادند. نمونة آماری، 120 کودک برای بهرة هوشی و 90 کودک برای هوش هیجانی بودند که به روش خوشه‌ای هدفمند انتخاب شدند و تبحر حرکتی آن‌ها با آزمون برونینکس- اوزرتسکی- دو بررسی شد.نتایج نشان داد که ارتباط تبحر حرکتی با هوش هیجانی بسیار بالا است. همچنین، بین شرایط هوش هیجانی،بالا و پایین، بالا و متوسط و پایین و متوسط، در تبحر حرکتی تفاوت معنادار وجود دارد. علاوه‌براین، ارتباط تبحر حرکتی با بهرة هوشی بسیار پایین است و بین گروه‌های بهرة هوشی تفاوت معناداری وجود ندارد.با توجه به نتایج این پژوهش، بهرة هوشی تأثیری درتبحر حرکتی ندارد؛ اما مطالعات محدود در این زمینه انجام پژوهش‌های بیشتری را می‌طلبند. کودکان با هوش هیجانی بالاتر تبحر حرکتی بالاتری دارند که این شاید به‌دلیل ادراک هیجانی، تسهیل هیجانی، شناخت هیجانی و مدیریت یا مهار هیجانی بالا در این کودکان باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

بهبود رشد جسمانی و حرکتی کودکان

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Relationship between IQ and Emotional Intelligence with Motor Proficiency in Boys’ 10-14-Year-Old in Tehran

نویسندگان [English]

Behzad Mohammadi Orangi ¹
Neda Shahrzad ²
Rasoul Yaali ²

¹ Ph.D. Student of Motor learning, Kharazmi University

² Assistant Professor of Motor behavior, Kharazmi University

چکیده [English]

Individual constraints are of the factors that can affect motor development. The aim of this study is survey the relationship between IQ and emotional intelligence with motor proficiency in boys’ 10-14-year-old son in Tehran. the research population is whole the boys 10-14 year-old in Tehran and study sample includes 120 children for IQ and 90 children for emotional intelligence that were selected by using of cluster purposeful and their motor proficiency was determined by using BOT-two test. The results show that the association of motor skills with emotional intelligence is very high and the conditions of emotional intelligence, high and low, high and average, low and average, there are significant differences in motor proficiency. In addition, the relationship between intelligence and intelligence is far behind and there is no significant difference between the groups in IQ. According to the survey results IQ has no effect on motor proficiency but more studies in this area are required. Children's motor proficiency was higher with higher emotional intelligence that this is may be due to the emotional perception, emotional facilitates, cognitive and management or highly emotional containment in these children.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Motor Proficiency
Intelligence Quotient
Emotional Intelligence
Children

مراجع

1. Galahu E, Ozmoon JC. Understanding motor development in a lifetime. Trans Bahram A , Ghadiri F, Shahrzad N. Tehran: Nafe no; 2012. (In Persian)

2. Sharifirad1 G, Mohebbi S, Matlabi M. The relationship of physical activity in middle age and cardiovascular proble1. Sharifirad1 G, Mohebbi S, Matlabi M. The relationship of physical activity in middle age and cardiovascular problems in old age in retired people in Isfahan. Horiz Med Sci. 2007;2(13):57–63.

3. Khalaj H, Ashtari M, Kashani V, heydarian S, Mobtakeran M. Human movement development. Arak: Arak University Press; 2013. p. 60-100 (In Persian)

4. Shajai M, Vaez Mousavi M. Motor learning: Concepts and applications.

Tehran: Moment of the Book; 2015. p. 1-296. (In Persian)

5. Milani F. Psychology of Exceptional Children and Adolescents. Publishing; 2016. p. 4-320. (In Persian)

6. Nazarpour SH, Khalaj H, Mardani F. The relationship between IQ, emotional intelligence and learning readiness with claws and volleyball. Motor Behavior. 2012;12(21) :141–61. (In Persian)

7. Schmidt R, ley T. Learning and controlling of movement. Translating: Hemayattalab R, Ghasemi A . Tehran.Science and movement. ;2013. (In Persian)

8. Hernandez AM, Caçola P. Motor proficiency predicts cognitive ability in four-year-olds. Eur Early Child Educ Res J. 2015;23(4):573–84.

9. Konter E. Nonverbal intelligence of soccer players according to their level of play. Procedia-Social Behav Sci. 2010;2(2):1114–20.

10. Murray GK, Veijola J, Moilanen K, Miettunen J, Glahn DC, Cannon TD, et al. Infant motor development is associated with adult cognitive categorisation in a longitudinal birth cohort study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2006;47(1):25–9.

11. Piek JP, Dawson L, Smith LM, Gasson N. The role of early fine and gross motor development on later motor and cognitive ability. Hum Mov Sci. 2008;27(5):668–81.

12. Wassenberg R, Feron FJM, Kessels AGH, Hendriksen JGM, Kalff AC, Kroes M, et al. Relation between cognitive and motor performance in 5‐to 6‐year‐old children: Results from a large‐scale cross‐sectional study. Child Dev. 2005;76(5):1092–103.

13. Goleman D. Trans Parsa S. Emotional intelligence. Tehran: Growth (Publications / buds); 2006. (In Persian)

14. Zizzi S, Deaner H, Hirschhorn D. The relationship between emotional intelligence and performance among college basketball players. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2003;15(3):262–9.

15. Mohammadi Orang B. The relationship between motor proficiency with body mass index, nutrition, parental consanguinity, IQ and emotional intelligence in healthy children 10-14 years old [thesis]. Kharazmi Tehran University; 2016. (In Persian)

16. Rahmani J. Reliability, Validity and Standardization of Raven's Progressive Matrix Test .Advanced in students of Azad University Khorasgan Branch. Knowledge and research in psychology.2008.1.61-74. (In Persian)

17. Javed, Kh. Study the reliability and validity of emotional intelligence Shoot [thesis]. [Tehran]: Tarbiat Modarres University; 1999. (In Persian)

18. Bruininks RH. Bruininks-Oseretsky test of motor proficiency, (BOT-2).Sidni: Minneapolis, MN Pearson Assess; 2005.

19. Malyna R, Bouchard K. Bhram A- Khljy H- Sabry A- Ltfy G- Sohrab M. Mature development and physical activity. Hope knowledge. Tehran: Institute of Physical Education; 1999. (In Persian)

20.Stodden DF, Goodway JD, Langendorfer SJ, Roberton MA, Rudisill ME, Garcia C, et al. A developmental perspective on the role of motor skill competence in physical activity: An emergent relationship. Quest. 2008;60(2):290–306.

ارتباط بهرة هوشی و هوش هیجانی با تبحر حرکتی در پسران 14-10 سال شهر تهران

مراجع

مراجع

دوره 10، شماره 32تابستان 1397مرداد 1397صفحه 65-78

دوره 10، شماره 32
تابستان 1397
مرداد 1397
صفحه 65-78