رفتار حرکتی

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

هزینه های دریافت نشریه

راهنمای نویسندگان

فرم ها

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

مدل‌یابی عوامل پویای مؤثر در رشد حرکات درشت اطفال نه تا 12 ماهه با استفاده از مدل معادلات ساختاری

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکترای رشد و تکامل حرکتی، دانشگاه تهران

2 دانشیار رفتار حرکتی، دانشگاه تهران

3 استادیار رفتار حرکتی، دانشگاه تهران

4 استادیار رفتار حرکتی، دانشگاه شیراز

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر، بررسی عوامل پویای مؤثر در حرکات درشت کودکان نه تا 12 ماهه بوده است. این پژوهش مطالعه‌ای توصیفی- پیمایشی است که با درنظرگرفتن نوع و اهداف آن در حیطة پژوهش‌های کاربردی است. تعداد 283 کودک به‌وسیلة مقیاس مرحله- سن غربالگری شدند. مقیاس‌های مورداستفاده شامل فراهم‌سازة محیط خانه برای تکامل حرکت اطفال، دلبستگی والدین پس از زایمان، پرسش‌نامة فرصت محیطی، پرسش‌نامة فعالیت بدنی عادتی بک و پرسش‌نامة سلامت عمومی بودند. عوامل مؤثر در رشد حرکات در سه بخش عوامل فردی، عوامل مادر و عوامل محیطی کودک دسته‌بندی شدند. برای تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌های کیفی از تی مستقل و برای تحلیل داده‌های کمی از مانوا، رگرسیون خطی به روش گام‌های منطقی و مدل معادلات ساختاری استفاده شده است. نتایج معادلات ساختاری نشان داد که عوامل فردی با ضریب اثر استاندارد برابر با 85/0 بیشترین تأثیر را بر رشد حرکات درشت داشتند و بعد از آن، عوامل محیطی با ضریب استاندارد برابر با 42/0- و عوامل مادرِ کودک با ضریب استاندارد برابر با 14/0 رشد حرکات درشت را پیش‌بینی کردند. نتایج رگرسیون نشان داد که در قسمت عوامل فردی، انگیزش و در قسمت عوامل محیطی، فراهم‌سازة محیط خانه سهم معناداری در پیش‌بینی حرکات درشت داشتند. نتایج پژوهش حاضر تأکیدی بر مدل برانفن برنر است. برانفن برنر ادعا می‌کند که رشد و تکامل طفل در ابتدا تحت‌تأثیر عوامل فردی و بیولوژیک او است و سپس، متأثر از عوامل محیطی طفل است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Modeling Dynamic Factors Affecting Gross Motor Development Milestone 9-12 Months Old Infant s with Using Structural Equation

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hajar Jahadian Sarvestani 1
  • Elahe Arabameri 2
  • Davoud Houminian Sharifabadi 3
  • Fazlollah Bagherzadeh 2
  • Fatemeh Pasand 4

1 Ph.D. Student of Motor Development, Tehran University

2 Associate Professor of Motor Behavior, Tehran University

3 Assistant Professor of Motor Behavior, Tehran University

4 Assistant Professor of Motor Behavior, Shiraz University

چکیده [English]

The present study aims to investigate the Modeling dynamic factors affecting gross motor development milestone of 9- 12-month-old infants. The study was a descriptive- survey, that considering the type and aims of the research was considered as an applied research. To this end 283 infants were screened in regard with age and stage questionnaire. The applied measures were preparation of the home environment for the infant motor development, the parental postpartum attachment scale, Beak habitual physical activity questionnaire and General health questionnaire. Factors affecting motor activities were grouped into three sections including Individual, Environmental and Mother Factors. The related data were analyzed by independent T, MANOA, step by step regression and structural equation. The results of structural equation indicated that individual factors (0.85) has the most important effect on anticipation gross motor development, after that environmental factor (-0.42) and finally mother factor (0.15) has effects on anticipation gross milestone in 9-12 month old infants, Results of the regression showed that considering individual factors, motivation is significant and in regard with environmental factors, affordance is significant in anticipation of gross motor development milestone in 9-12 month old infants. Results of the present study were concentrated on Branfen bernner model. This model claims that development of the infants was first affected by individual and biological factors and then by the environmental factors of the infants.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Gross Motor Development Milestone
  • Individual Factor
  • Environmental Factor
  • Mother Factors
  • Infant
مراجع
  1. Gabbard C,  Tamplain P, Bobbio T. Studying motor development: A biological and environmental perspective 2009; Nova Science: Chapter 5. pp3-4.
  2. Shojae M, Daneshfar A. Motor development. 3th ed. tehran: Imam Hosien University 2012. P 42. (In Persian).  
  3. Berk LE. Child development. 5th ed. Boston. Allyn and Bacon2000. P. 23-38.
  4. Arzomanianes S. Human development and growth. 2th ed. Tehran: Noore Danesh Publlication 2000. P. 10-5. (In Persian).
  5. Ricardo H, Aluísio J. D. B, Alicia M, Iná S. S, Cesar G. V, Fernando C. B. Developmental status at age 12 months according to birth weight and family income: A comparison of two Brazilian birth cohorts. Cad. Saúde Pública, Rio de Janeiro 2008; 24 (3): 444-50.
  6. Hediger ML, Overpeck MD, Ruan WJ, Troendle JF. Birthweight and gestational age effects on motor and social development. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2002; 16: 33–46.
  7. Meghan S, MPH L. S, Adair B, Goldman D, Judith B, Borja M. B. Infant overweight is associated with delayed motor development. J Pediatr. 2010 Jul; 157(1): 20–5. e1.
  8. Camargos A, Amaral M. V, Alves A C, Cristina R, Lacerda A. Overweight and obese infant present lower cognitive and motor development scores than normal-weight peers. Res Dev Disabil.2016; 59 :410-6.
  9. Carmeli E, Marmur R, Cohen A, Tirosh E. Preferred sleep position and gross motor achievement in early infancy. Eur J Pediatr. 2009; 168:711–5.
  10. Salls JS, Silverman LN, Gatty CM. Brief report—The relationship of infant sleep and play positioning to motor milestone achievement. Am J Occup Ther. 2002; 56:      577–80.
  11.  Atun-Einy O,  Cohen D,  Samuel M , Scher A. season of birth, crawling onset, and motor development in 7-month-old infants. J Reprod Infant Psycho. 2013; 31(4):   342-51.
  12. McGrath JJ, Saha S, Lieberman DE, Buka S. Season of birth is associated with anthropometric and neurocognitive outcomes during infancy and childhood in a general population birth cohort. Schizophr Res. 2006; 81: 91–100.
  13. Atun-E. O , Bergerb S, Scherc A. Assessing motivation to move and its relationship to motor development in infancy. Infant Behav Dev. 2013; 36: 457– 69.
  14. Isidora A, Paulina P, Alicia P, Francisca M. Risk factors for psychomotor development among infants born under optimal biological conditions. Rev Saude Publica. 1998 ;32(2); 138-47.
  15. Berger S, Nuzzo. Older siblings influence younger siblings’ motor development. Inf Child Dev. 2008; 17(6):607-15.
  16. Reid V, Daniel S, Tricia S. The presence or absence of older siblings and variation in infant goal-directed motor development. IJBD. 2010; 34(4): 325–9.
  17.  Karasik L. B, Tamis-L.C. S, Adolph, K.E. Transition from crawling to walking and infants’ actions with objects and people. Child Dev. 2011; 82(4): 1199–209.
  18. Darcheville J.C, Boyer C, M. Y. Training infant reaching using mother’s voice as reinforce. EJOBA. 2004; 5: 43–51.
  19. Palisano RJ, Chiarello LA, Haley SM. Factors related to mother- infant interaction in infant with motor delay. Pediatr Phys Ther. 1993; 5(2): 55-60.
  20. Chen C, Dai-C. L, Chun-Y. L, Meng-C. L. Effects of parenting role and parent–child interaction on infant motor development in Taiwan Birth Cohort Study. Early Hum Dev. 2015; 91: 259–64.
  21. Ellen S.S, Fábio S.F, Juliana I. k, Nadia C. V, Sara T. C, Fernando C .Analysis of the opportunities of motor stimulation in home environment in the central region of Rio Grande do Sul. Rev. bras. educ. fís. esporte [online]. 2015, 29(2): 279-88.
  22. Cesário D E, Silva F J, Teresa T M, Gonçalves I C, Bastos R R, Vieira T M, et al. Opportunities in the home environment for motor development. Rev SaúdePública. 2012;135-43.
  23. Raquel S, Nadia C V, Keila R P, Alessandra B M, Gabbard C. Associations of biological factors and affordances in the home with infant motor development. Pediatric int. 2013; 55: 197-203.
  24. Nasreen H-E, Zarina N. K, Yvonne F, Maigun E. Impact of maternal depressive symptoms and infant temperament on early infant growth and motor development: Results from a population-based study in Bangladesh. J Affect Disord. 2013; 146: 254–61.
  25. Chiara S, Girmay M, Charlotte H, Mark T, Bogale W, Michael D, Atalay A, Martin P, Yonas B. Maternal common mental disorders and infant development in Ethiopia: The P-MaMiE Birth Cohort. BMC Public Health. 2010; 10: 693-706.
  26. Chen X K, Wen S W, Fleming N, Demissie K, Rhoads G G, Walker M. Teenage pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes: a large population based retrospective cohort study. Int J Epidemiol. 2007; 3: 368–73.
  27. Dimity B C, Richard C L, Joseph D S, Clint A B. Cognitive and motor development in infants of adolescent mothers longitudinal analysis. Int J Behav Dev. 1986; 9:          1-13.
  28. Pearilap B R, Phyllise E, Varga B A. The relationship between age of mother and child health and development. Am J Public Health. 1981; 71(8): 810–7.
  29. Neggers YH, Goldenberg RL, Ramey SL, Cliver SP. Maternal pregpregnancy body mass index and psychomotor development in children Acta Obstet Scand. 2003; 82: 235-40.
  30. Hinkle SN, Schieve LA, Stein AD, Swan DW, Ramakrishnan U, Sharma AJ. Associations between maternal prepregnancy body mass index and child neurodevelopment at 2 years of age. Int J Obes. 2012; 36: 1312–9.
  31. Polańska K, Muszyński P, Sobala W, Dziewirska E, Merecz-K D, Hanke W. Maternal lifestyle during pregnancy and child psychomotor development-Polish mother and child cohort study. Early Hum Dev. 2015; 91: 317–25.
  32. Clapp JF , Simonian S, Lopez B, Appleby-Wineberg S, Harcar-Sevcik R. The one-year morphometric and neurodevelopmental outcome of the offspring of women who continued to exercise regularly throughout pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 178(3): 594-9.
  33. Whyte H, Hannah ME, Saigal S, Hannah WJ, Hewson S, Amankwah K, et.al. Outcomes of children at 2 years after planned cesarean birth versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 191: 864-71.
  34. Casas, M, Leda C H, Anne-E C, Pilar A. Maternal pre-pregnancy overweight and obesity, and child neuropsychological development: Two Southern European birth cohort studies. Int J Epidemiol. 2013; 42: 506–17.
  35. Craig H, Ayalew T, Fasil T, Makonnen A, Sandro G. Parental symptoms of common mental disorders and children’s social, motor, and language development in sub-Saharan Africa. ANN HUM BIOL. 2008; 35(3): 259–75.
  36. Group WMGRS. WHO motor development study: Windows of achievement for six gross motor development milestones. Acta Pædiatrica. 2006; (45): 86-95.
  37. Santos DCC, Tolocka RE, Carvalho J, Heringer LRC, Almeida CM, Miquelote AF. Gross motor performance and its association with neonatal and familial factors and day care exposure among children up to three years old. Rev Bras Fisioter 2009; 13(2): 173-9.
  38. Passand F, Khalaj H, Kazemnezhad A, arabamer E. Standardization of gross and fine movement of denver II for 3-6 year old children in shiraz. Harkat J. 2008; 38: 27-47. (In Persian).
  39. Jean G, Pauline E, Yasmin I C, Colin S, Raghu L. A review of environmental contributions to childhood motor skills. J Child Neurol. 2014; 29(11): 1531-47.
  40. Libertus K, Landa R J. The early motor questionnaire (EMQ): A parental report measure of early motor development. Infant Behav Dev. 2013; 36: 833–42.
  41. Ghasemi V. Optimal sample size estimation in structural equation models and its adequacy assessment for social researchers. Iran J Sociol Educ. 2001; 12(4): 138-61. (In Persian).
  42. Hofstenvon C. Action in development. Dev Sci. 2007; 10: 54–60.
  43. Adolph K, EVereijken B, Denny MA. Learning to crawl. Child Dev. 1998; 69: 1299–312.
رفتار حرکتی
دوره 11، شماره 36
تابستان 1398
تیر 1398
صفحه 149-168
فایل ها
سابقه مقاله
  • تاریخ دریافت: 15 آبان 1396
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 19 دی 1396
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 25 دی 1396
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار