نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار رفتار حرکتی، دانشگاه سمنان، سمنان، ایران

2 دانشجوی کارشناسی‌ارشد رفتار حرکتی دانشگاه سمنان، سمنان، ایران

چکیده

برای بررسی تحرک و تعادل حرکتی، ابزار روا و پایا و سازگار با فرهنگ لازم است. هدف پژوهش حاضر، اعتباریابی نسخۀ فارسی آزمون شاخص راه‌رفتن پویا (نسخۀ چهارموردی) در بیماران مولتیپل اسکلروزیس با و بدون سابقۀ افتادن بود. پژوهش حاضر ازنوع زمینه‌یابی بود. بدین‌منظور، 55 نفر از همة بیماران مبتلا به مولتیپل اسکلروزیس شهرستان یزد در سال 1395، انتخاب شدند و نسخۀ فارسی آزمون شاخص راه‌رفتن پویا را تکمیل کردند. با استفاده از روش بازترجمه درستی ترجمۀ ابزار تأیید شد. از تحلیل عاملی تأییدی، ضریب آلفای کرونباخ و ضریب همبستگی درون‌طبقهای، به‌ترتیب برای بررسی روایی سازۀ عاملی، همسانی درونی و ثبات زمانی استفاده شد.نتایج پژوهش نشان‌دهندۀ برازش مطلوب نسخۀ فارسی آزمون شاخص راه‌رفتن پویا (نسخۀ چهارموردی) در بیماران مولتیپل اسکلروزیس بود؛ به‎طوریکه شاخص‌های برازندگی (رمزی برابر با 08/0، سی.اِف.آی. برابر با 99/0 و تی.اِل.آی. برابر با 97/0)، همسانی درونی برابر با 93/0 و پایایی زمانی برابر با 70/0، به‌ترتیب بیانگر روایی سازۀ عاملی و پایایی مطلوب (درونی و زمانی) نسخۀ فارسی آزمون شاخص راه‌رفتن پویا (نسخۀ چهارموردی) در بیماران مولتیپل اسکلروزیس بودند. نتایج پژوهش حاضر نشان داد که نسخۀ فارسی آزمون شاخص راه‌رفتن پویا (نسخۀ چهارموردی) در بیماران مولتیپل اسکلروزیس ابزاری روا و پایا است؛ بنابراین، میتوان از آن در محیط‌های بالینی، درمانی و پژوهشی برای بررسی وضعیت تعادلی بیماران مولتیپل اسکلروزیس که درمعرض خطر زمین‌خوردن هستند، استفاده کرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Validation of the Persian Version of Dynamic Gait Index in Multiple Sclerosis Diseases (4-Item)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Vali Ollah Kashani 1
  • Fatemeh Dehestani 2
  • Mohammad Ali Soltaniyan 1

1 Assistant Professor of Motor Behavior, University of Semnan

2 M.Sc. Student of Motor behavior, University of Semnan

چکیده [English]

For measuring motor balance and mobility we need reliable & valid instrument witch adapted with culture. The present study aims to assess psychometric features of a Persian version of 4-Item dynamic gait index test for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS; with/without history of falling). By taking a survey-based approach, 55 MS patients in year 2016 from Yazd were randomly selected and complete Persian version of 4-Item dynamic gait index test. Face validity was confirmed through translation-retranslation. Construct validity was assessed through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) while internal consistency and temporal reliability were evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha and intraclass correlation, respectively. Our findings indicate desirable fit of the Persian version of 4-Item dynamic gait index test for MS patients. Indices of fit (RMSEA=0.08, CFI=0.99, TLI= 0.97), internal consistency (0.93), and temporal reliability (P ≥ 0.70) suggest proper validity and reliability of the Persian version of 4-Item dynamic index for MS patients. The results showed that the Persian version of 4-Item dynamic gait index is a valid and reliable instrument for MS patients that can be used in clinical, treatment, and research settings to identify MS patients prone to the risk of falling.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Reliability
  • Validity
  • Dynamic Gate Index
  • Multiple Sclerosis
  1. Abbasi FMA, Mozhdehi Panah H. The effect of depression on quality of life and disability Multiple sclerosis patients. J Qazvin Med Sci Uni. 2012;16(1):23-8.
  2. Compston A, Coles A. Multiple sclerosis Lancet. 2008;372:1502-17.
  3. Karpatkin HI. Multiple sclerosis and exercise: A review of the evidence. International Journal of MS Care. 2005;7(2):36-41.
  4. Tinetti ME. Performance‐oriented assessment of mobility problems in elderly patients. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 1986;34(2): 119-26.
  5. Shumway-Cook A, Baldwin M, Polissar NL, Gruber W. Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults. Physical therapy. 1997;77(8):812-9.
  6. Forsberg A, Andreasson M, Nilsagård YE. Validity of the dynamic gait index in people with multiple sclerosis. Physical therapy. 2013;93(10):1369-76.
  7. Chiu Y-P, Fritz SL, Light KE, Velozo CA. Use of item response analysis to investigate measurement properties and clinical validity of data for the dynamic gait index. Physical therapy. 2006;86(6):778-87.
  8. Jønsson LR, Kristensen MT, Tibaek S, Andersen CW, Juhl C. Intra-and interrater reliability and agreement of the Danish version of the dynamic gait index in older people with balance impairments. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2011;92(10):1630-5.
  9. Jonsdottir J, Cattaneo D. Reliability and validity of the dynamic gait index in persons with chronic stroke. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2007;88(11):1410-5.
  10. Lin J-H, Hsu M-J, Hsu H-W, Wu H-C, Hsieh C-L. Psychometric comparisons of 3 functional ambulation measures for patients with stroke. Stroke. 2010;41(9):2021-5.
  11. Wrisley DM, Walker ML, Echternach JL, Strasnick B. Reliability of the dynamic gait index in people with vestibular disorders. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2003;84(10):1528-33.
  12. Huang S-L, Hsieh C-L, Wu R-M, Tai C-H, Lin C-H, Lu W-S. Minimal detectable change of the Timed “Up & Go” Test and the Dynamic Gait Index in people with Parkinson disease. Physical therapy. 2011;91(1):114-21.
  13. Cattaneo D, Jonsdottir J, Repetti S. Reliability of four scales on balance disorders in persons with multiple sclerosis. Disability and rehabilitation. 2007;29(24):1920-5.
  14. McConvey J, Bennett SE. Reliability of the dynamic gait index in individuals with multiple sclerosis. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2005;86(1):   130-3.
  15. Wrisley DM, Marchetti GF, Kuharsky DK, Whitney SL. Reliability, internal consistency, and validity of data obtained with the functional gait assessment. Physical therapy. 2004;84(10):906-18.
  16. Marchetti G, Whitney S. The five-item dynamic gait index: Development and testing. Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy. 2005;29(4):212.
  17. Marchetti GF, Whitney SL. Construction and validation of the 4-item dynamic gait index. Physical therapy. 2006;86(12):1651-60.
  18. Dye DC, Eakman AM, Bolton KM. Assessing the validity of the dynamic gait index in a balance disorders clinic: An application of Rasch analysis. Physical therapy.2013;93(6): 809-18.
  19. Abdiani M, Golpayegani M, Khajavi D. Validity and reliability of Persian version of dynamic gait index in older men. Iranian Journal of Ageing. 2014 Jul 15;9(2):124-33.
  20. Giannì C, Prosperini L, Jonsdottir J, Cattaneo D. A systematic review of factors associated with accidental falls in people with multiple sclerosis: a meta-analytic approach. Clinical rehabilitation. 2014 Jul;28(7):704-16.
  21. Bazelier M, Staa, T van, & Uitdehaag, BM. The risk of fracture in patients with multiple sclerosis: the UK general practice research database. J Bone Miner Res. 2011; 26:2271–9.
  22. Kerzman H, Chetrit A, Brin L, Toren O. Characteristics of falls in hospitalized patients. Journal of advanced nursing. 2004;47(2):223-9.
  23. Sarhadi M, Aboutalebi S, Hosseini A. Effect supporting surface and focus on balance in elderly men with a history of falling. Journal of Ageing. 2008;3(9):37-46.
  24. Røyset B, Talseth-Palmer BA, Lydersen S, Farup PG. Effects of a fall prevention program in elderly: a pragmatic observational study in two orthopedic departments. Clinical interventions in aging. 2019;14:145-155.
  25. Atwater SW, Crowe TK, Deitz JC, Richardson PK. Interrater and test-retest reliability of two pediatric balance tests. Physical Therapy. 1990;70(2):79-87.
  26. Kline P. Principles and practice of structural equation modelling. 2nd ed. New York: The Guildford Press; 2005. p.9-15.
  27. Loehr JE. Mental toughness training for sports: Achieving athletic excellence: Penguin Books; 1986. p.130-179.
  28. Jones G HS, Connaughton D. A framework of mental toughness in the world's best, Psychologist. 2007;21:243-64.
  29. Herman T, Inbar-Borovsky N, Brozgol M, Giladi N, Hausdorff JM. The Dynamic Gait Index in healthy older adults: The role of stair climbing, fear of falling and gender. Gait & posture. 2009;29(2):237-41.
  30. Akbari Kamrani A, Zamani Sani H, Fathi Rezaie Z, Farsi A, Aghdasi M. Investigation of factor structure of Persian version of functional gait assessment in Iranian elderly. Iranian Journal of Ageing. 2010;5(17):16-22.
  31. Simon TA, Harro CC. Reliability and validity of the dynamic gait index in individuals with brain injury. 2004;28(4):153-201.
  32. Marchetti GF WS. Temporal and spatial characteristics of gait during performance of the dynamic gait index in people with and people without balance or vestibular disorders. Phys Ther. 2008;88(5):640-51.