طراحی و ساخت پرسش‌نامه ترصد در دیدبانی منجیان غریق

امینایی, علیرضا; شهابی کاسب, محمدرضا; استیری, زهرا

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

¹ دانشجوی دکترا دانشگاه تهران

² استادیار رفتار حرکتی/ دانشگاه حکیم سبزواری

چکیده

هدف این پژوهش، طراحی و ساخت پرسش‌نامه‌ای برای سنجش ترصد در دیدبانی منجیان غریق بود. آزمودنی‌های تحقیق حاضر شامل منجیان غریق درجه 1 و 2 از میان استخرهای شهرستان‌های مختلف ایران در سال 92-91 بودند که مدیران آن استخرها حاضر به همکاری با محققین بودند. در فرایند طراحی و ساخت، شناسایی عوامل روان‌شناختی زمینه‌ساز در تغییرات سطح ترصد، ساده سازی این عوامل و رسم مدل مفهومی پیشنهادی، روایی صوری و محتوایی عوامل، ساخت بانک سوالات و پرسش‌نامه اولیه، روایی صوری و محتوایی پرسش‌نامه اولیه، اجرای آزمون پایلوت و تجزیه و تحلیل سوالات انجام شد و در نهایت، پرسش‌نامه 142 سوالی بدست آمد. در فرایند روایی و پایایی سنجی، در ابتدا پرسش‌نامه 142سوالی در اختیار 310 نفر از منجیان غریق قرار گرفت. سپس به منظور بررسی روایی سازه، از روش تحلیل مؤلفه‌های اصلی با چرخش ابلیمین مستقیم و روش حداقل میانگین جزئی برای تبیین تعداد مولفه‌های استخراجی استفاده شد. جهت تعیین پایایی پرسش‌نامه، از پایایی زمانی به فاصله ده روز (همبستگی درون طبقه‌ای) و همسانی درونی (آلفای کرونباخ) بر روی 40 منجی غریق دیگر استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد که پرسش‌نامه نهایی 102 سوالی با 15 مؤلفه اصلی که 91/54 درصد از کل واریانس را در بین سوال‌ها تبیین می‌کنند و همچنین با میزان همسانی درونی 92/0 و پایایی بازآزمایی معنی دار 74/0، پرسش‌نامه‌ای روا، پایا، بومی و تخصصی جهت سنجش ترصد در دیدبانی منجیان غریق می‌باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

یادگیری حرکتی

عنوان مقاله [English]

Design and Construction of Lifeguards’ Vigilance in Surveillance Questionnaire

نویسندگان [English]

alireza aminaee ¹
Mohammadreza Shahabi kaseb ²
Zahra Estiri ²

چکیده [English]

The purpose of this research was to design and construct a questionnaire for evaluating lifeguards’ vigilance in surveillance. Present research samples were degree 1 and 2 lifeguards from different provinces of Iran in 1391 and 1392 that their management agreed to cooperate with researchers. In process of designing and construction of questionnaire, identification of psychological factors affecting vigilance, simplification of these factors and drawing proposed conceptual model, face and content validity of factors, construction of questions bank and initial questionnaire, face and content validity of initial questionnaire, a pilot test, and item analysis were done and ultimately, a 142- items questionnaire was obtained. In process of determining validity and reliability of questionnaire, at first, the 142- items questionnaire were given to 310 lifeguards. Then, for analyzing construct validity of questionnaire, the Principle Component Analysis methods with Direct Oblimin Rotation technique and Minimum Partial Average method for determining the number of extracted component, were used. To determine Questionnaire reliability, time reliability test with 10 days interval (intra class correlation) and internal consistency (Cronbach Alpha) were used on another 40 lifeguards. Result demonstrate that the final 102- items questionnaire with 15 major component that determine 54/91 percent of total variance among all questions and also with internal consistency of 0/92 and significant test retest reliability of 0/74, is a valid, reliable, localized, and specialized questionnaire for evaluating vigilance in lifeguards' surveillance.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

vigilance
surveillance
lifeguard
Questionnaire

مراجع

1) Lattal D. Vigilance: behaving safely routine, novel, and rare events. PMeZine [internet]; 2012 Apr 12. [cited 2014 Jan 30]. Available from: http://aubreydaniels.com/pmezine/ vigilance-behaving-safely-during-routine-novel-and-rare-events

2) Pattyn N, Capt M D, Soeten E. Endogenous and exogenous attention in vigilance tasks. Vrije Universiteit Brussels;2004.Available from: http://viper.rma.ac.be/ pub/ PaperIMTAPattyn-Soetens2. pdf

3) Smit A S, Eling P A T M, Coenen A M L. Mental effort causes vigilance decrease due to resource depletion. Acta Psychologica. 2004; 115(1): 35–42.

4) Gunzelmann G, Moore L R, Gluck K A, Van Dongen H P A, Dinges D F. Individual difference in sustained vigilant attention: insight from computational cognitive modeling. Paper presented at: CogSci 2008. In Proceedings of the Thirtieth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Washington, DC, USA; 2008.

5) Hubal R, Reyes C, Newlin D. Individual differences in vigilance tasks: Research brief. Research Triangle Park: Institute for Homeland Security Solutions, Norce Carolina, USA; April, 2009‌. 10 P.

6) Shaw T H, Matthews G, Warm J S, Finomore V S, Silverman L, Costa Jr P T. Individual differences in vigilance: Personality, ability and state of stress. J Res Pers . 2010; 44(3): 297-308.

7) Stevenson H W. The effects of task and target characteristics on the vigilance decrement. Dissertation: Christchurch. University of Canterbury; 2010.

8) Head J, Helton W S. Natural scene stimuli and lapses of sustained attention. Conscious Cogn. 2012; 21(4): 1617-25.

9) Ross H A. The effect of disruptions on vigilance. Master’s Thesis. Christchurch: University of Canterbury; 2013.

10) Figueroa I J, Youmans R J. Individual differences in cognitive flexibility predict performance in Vigilance Tasks. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 2012; 56(1): 1099-103

11) Fenner P, Leahy s, Buhk A, Dawes p. Prevention of drowning: Visual scanning and attention span in lifeguard. J Occup Health, Australia and New Zealand. 1999; 15(1): 61-6.

12) Griffiths T. Psychology of lifeguarding. [excerpt from safer beaches] Human Kinetics [internet]; 2002. [Cited 2014 Jan 30]. Available from: http://www.humankinetics.com/ excerpts/excerpts/psychology-of-lifeguarding

13) Schwebel D C, Jones H N, Holder E, Marciani F. Lifeguards: A forgotten aspect of drowning prevention. J Inj Violence Res. 2010; 2(1): 1-3.

14) Coblentz A, Mollard R, Cabon P. bibliographic study of lifeguard vigilance. Applied Anthropology Institute, Paris, France; 2001. 34P.

15) Philips R M. Identification of factors that contribute to an increase in lifeguard complacency. Master’s Thesis. East Carolina: East Carolina University; 2010.

16) Pia F. Observations on the drowning of nonswimmers. Journal of Physical Education. The YMCA Society of North America, Warsaw, Indiana. 1974. 5 P. Available from: www.pia-enterprises.com/observations.rtf

17) Patterson L. Factors affecting lifeguard recognition of the submerged victim: Implications for lifeguard training, lifeguarding systems and aquatic facility design. Paper presented at: World Conference on Drowning Prevention. In Proceedings of the World Water Safety Conference and Exhibition. Porto, Portugal; 2007 Sep. 27-9

18) World Health Organization. Guidelines for Safe Recreational Water Environments, Vol. 2. Swimming Pools and Similar Environments. Geneva: world health organization. 2006: 253.

19) Wendling R C, Vegelsong H, Wuensch K L, Ammirati A. A pilot study of lifeguard perception. IJARE. 2007; 1: 322-8.

20) National Aquatic Safety Company. Nasco lifeguard text book .2nd Rev. Ed. [place unknown]. Nasco, LLC; 2008. 115 P.

21) Johnson M P. The effect of activity preference on attention restoration in lifeguards. PhD Dessertation. Salt lake, Utah: The University of Utah. 2009. 64 P.

22) Avramidis S, Butterly R, Llewellyn D. Drowning incident rescuer characteristics: Encoding the First component of 4W model. IJARE. 2009; 3(1): 66-82.

23) Griffiths R C, Griffiths T J. Internal noise distraction in lifeguarding. IJARE. 2012; 7(1): 56-71.

24) Methot L L, Huitema B E. Effects of signal probability on individual differences in vigilance. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 1998; 40(1): 102-10.

25) Helton W S, Warm J S, Tripp L D, Matthews G, Parasuraman R, Hancock P A. Cerebral lateralization of vigilance: A function of task difficulty. Neuropsychologia. 2010; 48(6): 1683–8.

26) Bonnefond A, Doignon-Camus N, Hoeft A, Dufour A. Impact of motivation on cognitive control in the context of vigilance lowering: An ERP study. Brain Cognition. 2011; 77(3): 464- 71.

27) Szalma J L. Individual differences in performance, workload and stress in sustained attention: Optimisms and pessimisms. Pers Indiv Differ. 2009; 47(5): 441-5.

28) Winston L. Dying to swim: Lifeguards’ response to simulated aquatic emergencies. Master Thesis. Oklahoma: University of Tulsa; 2013.

29) Driver J, Frith C. Shifting baselines in attention research. Mac Millan Magazines Ltd; 2000 1(2): 147- 8.

30) Perry A R, Laurie C A. Sustained attention and the type a behavior pattern: The effect of daydreaming on performance. J Gen Psychol. 1992; 119(3): 217-28.

31) Lawshe C H. A quantitative approach to content validity. Pers Psychol. 1975; 28(4): 563-75.

32) Polit D F, Beck C T. The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2006; 29(5): 489-97.

33) Beavers A S, Lounsbury J W, Richards J K, Huck S W, Skolits G J, Esquivel S L. Practical considerationas for using exploratory factor analysis in educational research. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation. 2013; 18(6): 1-13.

34) Tabachnick B G, Fidell L S. Using multivariate statistics. 6th ed. Pearson Education, Ink. USA; 2013.

35) Courtney M G R. Determining the number of factors to retain in EFA: Using the SPSS R-menu v2.0 to make more judicious estimations. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation. 2013; 18(8): 1-14.

36) Ovwigho, B. O. Empirical Demonstration of Techniques for Computing the Discrimination Power of a Dichotomous Item Response Test. Journal of Educational and Social Research. 2014; 4(1), 189-95

طراحی و ساخت پرسش‌نامه ترصد در دیدبانی منجیان غریق

مراجع

مراجع

دوره 7، شماره 20 - شماره پیاپی 20تابستان 94شهریور 1394صفحه 105-126

دوره 7، شماره 20 - شماره پیاپی 20
تابستان 94
شهریور 1394
صفحه 105-126