نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجو کارشناسی ارشد رفتار حرکتی، دانشکده تربیت بدنی، موسسه آموزش عالی عطار، مشهد، ایران.
2 گروه رفتار حرکتی، دانشکده تربیت بدنی، موسسه آموزش عالی عطار، مشهد، ایران.
3 گروه تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، واحد مشهد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مشهد، ایران.
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
Extended Abstract
Background and Purpose
Physical practice is widely regarded as the primary method for acquiring motor skills. However, research has indicated that skills can also be learned through approaches that do not involve physical execution, one of which is mental practice. According to Schmidt's schema theory, making errors plays a positive role in motor learning; yet, some evidence demonstrates the positive effectiveness of errorless practice as well. This dichotomy raises the question of whether the mechanisms underlying physical and mental practice differ, and whether their effects might depend on the type of training—specifically, errorless or errorful practice. Given this context, the aim of the present study was to compare the effects of physical and mental practice, with respect to both errorless and errorful modalities, on the acquisition and learning of futsal shooting skills.
Methods
This study employed a semi-experimental, field-based design. The statistical population included all non-physical education female students at Islamic Azad University, Mashhad branch, enrolled during the summer term of 1402 (2023). A total of 75 students were recruited by convenience sampling and randomly assigned to five equal groups (n = 15 each): errorless mental practice, errorful mental practice, errorless physical practice, errorful physical practice, and a control group. All participants were between 22 and 25 years old and were classified as beginners, having no prior experience or formal involvement in football-related activities.
Initially, the experimental task was explained to all participants, after which those in the mental practice groups completed the Vividness of Movement Imagery Questionnaire 2 (VMIQ-2) to assess their mental imagery ability. The study began with a pre-test comprising 10 futsal shooting trials from a distance of 3.5 meters. Following a five-minute rest period, the acquisition phase was conducted for the experimental groups, each completing one session of 80 trials, organized into eight blocks of 10 trials each; the control group instead engaged in an unrelated computer task. A two-minute break was provided between blocks.
Post-testing was performed in a similar fashion to the pre-test, immediately following the acquisition phase. Participants then completed a self-report sheet (verbal rules) documenting their applied strategies and methods during training. Forty-eight hours later, three additional tests were administered: a retention test (10 shots from six meters), a distance transfer test (10 shots from 6.5 meters), and a secondary transfer test (dual task: counting metronome beats while shooting from six meters), with the order of these tests counterbalanced across participants and a one-minute rest between blocks.
For statistical analysis, a mixed-design analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare group performance across the pre- and post-test phases. A one-way ANOVA assessed differences among groups in the retention and transfer tests, with LSD post-hoc tests employed where necessary to explore significant findings.
Results
Descriptive statistics revealed that both mental practice groups demonstrated relatively high imagery abilities according to VMIQ-2 scores. The results of the 5 × 2 ANOVA (five groups by two test phases) evidenced significant main effects of group (η²p = 0.126, P = 0.049, F(4,70) = 2.512) and phase (η²p = 0.091, P = 0.010, F(1,70) = 7.038), as well as a significant interaction between group and phase (η²p = 0.194, P = 0.004, F(4,70) = 4.201). Critically, there were no group differences in the pre-test (P > 0.05 for all comparisons), affirming homogeneity at baseline. In contrast, post-test comparisons showed that both the errorless mental and errorless physical practice groups significantly outperformed their errorful counterparts (P < 0.05 for both).
One-way ANOVA results also revealed significant group differences in retention (η²p = 0.189, P = 0.008, F(3,56) = 4.337), distance transfer (η²p = 0.188, P = 0.008, F(3,56) = 4.338), and secondary transfer testing (η²p = 0.134, P = 0.011, F(3,56) = 4.092). However, no significant group difference was observed in the self-reported verbal rules (η²p = 0.026, P = 0.747, F(3,56) = 0.409).
Post-hoc analyses confirmed no pre-test differences between groups. In the post-test phase, participants in both the errorless physical and mental practice groups showed superior performance, with means and standard deviations of (M = 150.56, SD = 40.45) and (M = 148.51, SD = 54.74), respectively. For retention, values were (M = 155.28, SD = 49.92) and (M = 156.6, SD = 43.07); for distance transfer, (M = 156.1, SD = 45.18) and (M = 157.62, SD = 29.9); for secondary transfer, (M = 175.73, SD = 40.73) and (M = 176.84, SD = 4.62), all indicating statistically significant improvements compared to the other groups (P < 0.05).
Conclusion
The study’s findings indicate that both mental and physical practice conducted with minimal errors (i.e., errorless practice) result in better acquisition and transfer of futsal shooting skills than errorful practice. Contrary to some contemporary research, these results imply a similar underlying mechanism for mental and physical practice, where errorless learning enhances performance. Additionally, consistent with theories of implicit learning and conscious reprocessing, errorless practice favors task learning and generalization, a finding that contradicts traditional beliefs emphasizing the benefits of trial-and-error or errorful practice.
It appears that the task type—here, a gross motor skill involving targeted shooting—may be optimally learned under errorless conditions, both physically and mentally. This supports the notion that the nature of the task and the modality of practice should be considered in designing motor learning programs and points to the need for further investigation. Based on these results, both physical and mental errorless practice are effective strategies for the acquisition of futsal shooting in novices.
Article Message
The results suggest that futsal shooting—a gross motor, target-based skill—is more effectively acquired by beginners through errorless practice, whether physical or mental. This finding highlights the mechanistic similarity between physical and mental practice, contradicts some prior studies, and suggests that error-minimizing approaches may facilitate enhanced motor learning. Consequently, future research should further explore the interaction of task type and practice modality.
Ethical Considerations
All ethical principles and guidelines in research and scientific publication were scrupulously observed throughout this study.
Authors’ Contributions
The first author contributed 50%, the second author (supervisor) 30%, and the third author 20% to this research.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest associated with this article.
Acknowledgments
This article is derived from the first author’s thesis. The authors extend sincere thanks to Mr. Ghamari (supervisor), Ms. Golzar, Mr. Moghadam (Director of the Physical Education Department, Islamic Azad University of Mashhad), and Ms. Rostamian for their support in data collection, as well as to all participants for their valuable involvement in this study.
کلیدواژهها English
11. Sohrabi M, Farkhi A, Bahram A, Arghaemi N. The effect of physical practice and random/blocked mental imagery on performance and learning of tracking task. Journal of Movement Science and Sports. 2005;2(4):61–76. [In Persian].
12. Feltz DL, Landers DM, Becker BJ. A revised meta-analysis of the mental practice literature on motor skill learning. In: National Research Council (Ed.), Enhancing human performance, part III: Improving motor performance. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1988. Chapter 4; p.3–36.
13. Feltz DL, Landers DM. The effects of mental practice on motor skill learning and performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Sport Psychology. 1983;5(1):25–57. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsp.5.1.25
14. Truong C, Hilt PM, Bouguila F, Bove M, Lebon F, Papaxanthis C, Ruffino C. Time-of-day effects on skill acquisition and consolidation after physical and mental practices. Scientific Reports. 2022;12(1):33–59. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09749-x
15. Amini H. Determining the role of added feedback and task variability in physical and mental training on the acquisition and learning of table tennis forehand technique. [Masterˈs thesis]: [The University of Kordestan]; 2013. [In Persian].
16. Coelho CJ, Nusbaum HC, Rosenbaum DA, Fenn KM. Imagined actions aren't just weak actions: Task variability promotes skill learning in physical practice but not in mental practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 2012;38(6):1759–64. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028065
17. Driskell JE, Copper C, Moran A. Does mental practice enhance performance? Journal of Applied Psychology. 1994;79(4):481–92. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.4.481
18. Jackson PL, Doyon J, Richards CL, Malouin F. The efficacy of combined physical and mental practice in the learning of a foot-sequence task after stroke: a case report. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. 2004;18(2):106–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888439004265249
19. Qavi S. The effect of whole body vibration training and mental training on the balance of elderly men [Masterˈs thesis]: [Semnan University]; 2014. [In Persian].
20. Dyck RM. Mental and physical practice: Comparing their effects on hand-eye coordination tasks. Undergraduate Psychology Research Methods Journal. 2016;1(19):11.
21. Perreault ME, Brown C, Doan RJ, Dolbow DR. Effect of mental and physical practice on clinical skill learning in kinesiology. Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice. 2019;17(1):8. https://doi.org/10.46743/1540-580x/2019.1781
22. Abdoli B, Farsi A, Timuri Kharavi M. Comparison of the effect of mental training and physical training in fatigue and non-fatigue conditions on the learning of generalized motor program and parameter. Sports Management and Movement Behavior Research Paper. 2014;10(19):25–38. https://doi.org/10.22080/jsmb.2014.830 [In Persian].
23. Gülbahçe Ö. Comparison of physical and mental practice on acquisition of free basketball shot. Journal of Education and Training Studies. 2018;6(12a):19–22. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v6i12a.3886
24. Fathizadan A, Ilchizadeh N. Addressing the similarity and differences of physical and mental practice. Sports Psychology Studies. 2022;11(39):245–62. https://doi.org/10.22089/SPSYJ.2021.10311.2139 [In Persian].
25. Ghanbari I. The effect of a selected physical, mental, observational and combined training program along with sleep deprivation on learning badminton short serve [Ph.D. thesis]: [Mashhad Ferdowsi University]; 2018. [In Persian].
26. Masters R, Maxwell J. The theory of reinvestment. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2008;1(2):160–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/17509840802287218
27. Masters RS, Poolton JM. Advances in implicit motor learning. In: Hodges NJ, Williams AM (Eds.), Skill acquisition in sport: research, theory, and practice. London, New York: Routledge; 2012. pp. 59-75. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203133712
28. Masters RSW. Knowledge, knives and know‐how: The role of explicit versus implicit knowledge in the breakdown of a complex motor skill under pressure. British Journal of Psychology. 1992;83(3):343–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1992.tb02446.x
29. Maxwell JP, Masters RSW, Kerr E, Weedon E. The implicit benefit of learning without errors. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A. 2001;54(4):1049–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/713756014
30. Lee TD, Eliasz KL, Gonzalez D, Alguire K, Ding K, Dhaliwal C. On the role of error in motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior. 2015;48(2):99–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2015.1046545
31. Sanli EA, Lee TD. What roles do errors serve in motor skill learning? An examination of two theoretical predictions. Journal of Motor Behavior. 2014;46(5):329–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2014.913544
32. Levac D, Driscoll K, Galvez J, Mercado K, O'Neil L. OPTIMAL practice conditions enhance the benefits of gradually increasing error opportunities on retention of a stepping sequence task. Human Movement Science. 2017;56(Pt B):129–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2017.10.017
33. Schmidt RA. A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review. 1975;82(4):225–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076770
34. Seyedzadeh F. Comparison of the effect of errorless and errorfull practice on covert learning of the fundamental kicking skill and psychological variables in 10-year-old girls [Masterˈs thesis]: [Al-Zahra University]; 2013. [In Persian].
35. Savelsbergh G, Cañal-Bruland R, Van Der Kamp J. Error reduction during practice: A novel method for learning to kick free-kicks in soccer. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching. 2012;7(1):47–56. https://doi.org/10.1260/1747-9541.7.1.47
36. Fallah Amini M. The effect of errorless and errorfull training on the development of basic motor skills with kicking over the shoulder and dribbling in 5–6 year old children [Masterˈs thesis]: [Khwarazmi University]; 2017. [In Persian].
37. Mohammadi J, Qamari A, Hessari SA. Learning and generalization of errorless and errorfull practice in 10–12-year-old girls. Movement Behavior. 2016;8(23):49–64. https://doi.org/10.22089/mbj.2016.657 [In Persian].
38. Kashani V, Momenzadeh M, Bagherli J. The effect of trial-error based learning and training variability on mental effort and throwing performance. Movement Behavior. 2020;12(40):37–50. https://doi.org/10.22089/mbj.2019.6041.1693 [In Persian].
39. Nazari Kakundi S, Saberi Kakhki AR, Rehbanfard H, Javadian K, Moradi Noorabadi M. Effects of implicit and explicit practice schedule on performance and learning of bimanual coordination task of elder. Journal of Gerontology. 2018;3(1):71–86. https://doi.org/10.29252/joge.2.4.71 [In Persian].
40. Nazari Kakundi S, Saberi Kakhki AR, Taheri Torbati HR, Rehbanfard H. The role of working memory capacity on the learning the relative timing a motor task: Emphasis on implicit and explicit learning approach. Psychology of Human Behavior. 2018;6(2):11–20. [In Persian].
41. Nazari Kakavandi S, Saberi Kakhki AR, Taheri Torbati HA, Rehban Fard H. The effect of errorless-errorfull and random exercises on relative timing learning of a selected motor task: with emphasis on the overt and covert learning approach. Journal of Sports Movement Growth and Learning. 2019;11(3):321-342. https://doi.org/10.22059/jmlm.2019.254917.1366 [In Persian].
42. Nazari Kakundi S, Saberi Kakhki AR, Taheri Torbati H, Rahban Fard H. The effect of selected training arrangements on the acquisition and learning of relative timing of a motor task: with emphasis on an overt and covert learning approach. Movement Behavior. 2021;13(45):61-90. https://doi.org/10.22089/mbj.2018.5641.1655 [In Persian].
43. Qamari A, Mohammadi J, Mohammadi M. The effect of errorfull and errorless practice on the learning and transfer of dart throwing skills of mentally retarded girls. Movement Behavior. 2015;7(21):111-26. [In Persian].
44. Salehi H, Mehrovarz M, Rafei Borujeni M. Application of errorless practice to facilitate implicit motor learning in children. Journal of Sports Movement Growth and Learning. 2018;10(3):367-84. https://doi.org/10.22059/jmlm.2018.208461.1100 [In Persian].
45. Sohbatiha M, Jabri Moghadam AA, Shahbazi M. The effect of errorless, errorfull practice and equipment scaling on the accuracy of children's motor performance under psychological pressure. Cognitive Psychology Quarterly. 2018;5(4):31-40. [In Persian].
46. Kargar M, Pour Aghaei Ardakani Z, Behelet Z. The effect of errorfull and errorless learning on the learning of shooting skills. In: 9th International Conference on Physical Education and Sports Sciences. Tehran; 2015. [In Persian].
47. Roberts R, Callow N, Hardy L, Markland D, Bringer J. Movement imagery ability: development and assessment of a revised version of the vividness of movement imagery questionnaire. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2008;30(2):200-21. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.30.2.200
48. Hall CR, Martin KA. Measuring movement imagery abilities: a revision of the movement imagery questionnaire. Journal of Mental Imagery. 1997;21(1-2):143-54.
49. Sohrabi M, Farsi A, Foladiyan J. Determining the validity and reliability of the Persian version of the revised movement visualization questionnaire. Movement Behavior. 2010;2(4):13-23. [In Persian].
50. Poolton JM, Masters RSW, Maxwell JP. Passing thoughts on the evolutionary stability of implicit motor behavior: performance retention under physiological fatigue. Consciousness and Cognition. 2007;16(2):456-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2006.06.008
51. Sanli EA, Lee TD. Nominal and functional task difficulty in skill acquisition: effects on performance in two tests of transfer. Human Movement Science. 2015;41:218-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2015.03.006
52. Liao CM, Masters RSW. Analogy learning: a means to implicit motor learning. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2001;19(5):307-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410152006081
53. Adams JA. A closed-loop theory of motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior. 1971;3(2):111-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.1971.10734898
54. Ghaffari T. Comparison of the effect of simile, external focus and errorless training on covert learning of basketball free throw skills in 10-11-year-old girls [Senior Thesis]: [Al-Zahra University]; 2013. [In Persian].
55. Assor A, Gordon D. The implicit learning theory of hidden‐curriculum research. Journal of Curriculum Studies. 1987;19(4):329-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027870190404
56. Masters RSW, Poolton JM, Maxwell JP. Stable implicit motor processes despite aerobic locomotor fatigue. Consciousness and Cognition. 2008;17(1):335-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2007.03.009
57. Zhu FF, Poolton JM, Wilson MR, Maxwell JP, Masters RSW. Neural co-activation as a yardstick of implicit motor learning and the propensity for conscious control of movement. Biological Psychology. 2011;87(1):66-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.02.004
58. Ong NT. Perceptions of performance success and motor learning [Doctoral Dissertation]: [University of British Columbia]. 2018. https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0372347
59. Bertollo M, Berchicci M, Carraro A, Comani S, Robazza C. Blocked and random practice organization in the learning of rhythmic dance step sequences. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2010;110(1):77-84. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.110.1.77-84
60. Guadagnoli MA, Lee TD. Challenge point: a framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior. 2004;36(2):212-24. https://doi.org/10.3200/JMBR.36.2.212-224
61. Gabbett T, Masters R. Challenges and solutions when applying implicit motor learning theory in a high performance sport environment: examples from rugby league. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching. 2011;6(4):567-75. https://doi.org/10.1260/1747-9541.6.4.567
62. Stevens D, Anderson DI, O’Dwyer NJ, Williams AM. Does self-efficacy mediate transfer effects in the learning of easy and difficult motor skills? Consciousness and Cognition. 2012;21(3):1122-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2012.03.014
63. Otten M. Choking vs. clutch performance: a study of sport performance under pressure. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2009;31(5):583-601. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.31.5.583
64. Capio CM, Sit HP, Poolton JM, Abernethy AB, Masters RSW. Training a fundamental movement skill in children with disabilities. The 18th International Symposium on Adapted Physical Activity (ISAPA 2011); Paris, France. 2011.
65. Rendell MA, Masters RSW, Farrow D, Morris T. An implicit basis for the retention benefits of random practice. Journal of Motor Behavior. 2010;43(1):1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2010.530304
