ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی و هنجاریابی نسخۀ فارسی پرسش‌نامۀ تجربۀ نوجوانان در ورزش

کاشانی, ولی اله; آذری, منصوره

doi:10.22089/mbj.2016.661

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

¹ استادیار دانشگاه سمنان

² دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد دانشگاه سمنان

https://doi.org/10.22089/mbj.2016.661

چکیده

هدفازپژوهشحاضر،تعیینرواییوپایایینسخۀفارسی پرسش‌نامۀ تجربۀ نوجوانان در ورزش میباشد. بدینمنظور، 400 ورزشکار دختر و پسر در سطوح مختلف ورزشی از بین ورزشکاران رشته‌های مختلف بهشکلنمونه‌گیریتصادفی انتخاب گردیدندو نسخۀفارسی پرسش‌نامۀ تجربۀ نوجوانان در ورزش را تکمیل کردند. ابتدا، با استفادهاز روش ترجمه ـبازترجمه،رواییصوری و صحتترجمۀ پرسشنامه تأیید گردید. درادامه،بهمنظورتعیینرواییسازةپرسش‌نامه‌ ازتحلیلعاملیتأییدیمبتنیبر مدل معادلاتساختاری استفاده شد وبرایتعیینهمسانیدرونی آن، ضریبآلفایکرونباخ بهکار رفت. پایاییزمانیسؤال‌ها نیز توسط ضریبهمبستگی درونطبقه‌ایدرروش آزمون ـآزمونمجددبررسی گردید وبرایتعیینهنجار،نقاطدرصدیمورداستفاده قرار گرفت. یافتههای پژوهش حاکی از عدم برازش مطلوب مدل اولیۀ پرسش‎نامۀ تجربۀ نوجوانان در ورزش (37 سؤالی) میباشد. پس از حذف 10 سؤال (عامل تجربیات منفی)، مدل مرتبۀ اول و دوم از شاخص‎های برازندگی قابلقبولی برخوردار شدند. علاوهبراین، ضرایبآلفایکرونباخوهمبستگیدرونطبقه‌اینشان داد کهنسخۀفارسی پرسش‌نامۀ تجربۀ نوجوانان در ورزش با 27 سؤال ازهمسانی درونی و پایایی زمانیقابلقبولیدربیننوجوانان ورزشکاربرخورداراست؛ لذا، نسخۀ فارسی پرسش‌نامۀ تجربۀ نوجوانان در ورزش بهعنوان ابزاری روا و پایا قابلیت استفادهشدن توسطپژوهشگراندرجهت شناسایی اثرات مشارکت ورزشی بر جنبه‌های مختلف زندگینوجوانان را دارا می‏باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Psychometric properties and normalization of Persian version of the young experience survey in sport

نویسندگان [English]

Valiallah Kashani ¹
Mansoureh Azari ²

چکیده [English]

The purpose of this study was determining validity and reliability and normalization of the Persian version of the young experience questionnaire in sport. For this purpose, 400 boys and girls with different levels of skills and in different fields, were chosen by random sampling and completed the Persian version of the young experience questionnaire in sport. At first it was confirmed by using translation-back translation method and face validity and translation accuracy. For determining questionnaire constructive validity of confirmatory factor analysis based on structural equations model was used for determining questionnaire Internal consistency of Cronbach alpha coefficient was used for temporal reliability of items intra-class correlation coefficient under test-retest method was used to study temporal reliability of items and percentile points was used for normalization. The results showed that the first model of Persian Version of the Young Experience Survey in Sport (37 questions) was not favorable fit indexes. After eliminating the ten questions of the Negative Experiences factor, the second model with 27 questions had acceptable fit index. In addition, Cronbach alpha coefficient and intra-class correlation coefficient showed that Persian version of the young experience questionnaire in sport with 27 questions has an acceptable and temporal and internal reliability among young athletes. So Persian version of the young experience questionnaire in sport has the usability by researchers in order to identify the effects of sports participation on various aspects of young's life.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Personal & Social skills
Cognitive Skills
Goal setting
Initiative
Negative experiences

مراجع

1) واعظ موسوی محمدکاظم، شجاعی معصومه. توصیف و مقایسۀ میزان تبحر حرکتی دانش‌آموزان دختر و پسر مقطع راهنمایی تهران. نشریۀ المپیک. 1384؛ (13): 94ـ79.

2) احمدآبادی زهره. زادهمحمدی علی. تأثیر ورزش بر خطرپذیری دانشآموزان دبیرستانی شهر تهران. نشریۀ رفتار حرکتی. 1391؛ (11): 62ـ45.

3) Larson R W. Toward a psychology of positive youth development. American Psychologist. 2000; (55): 170-83.

4) Locke E A, Latham G P. The application of goal setting to sports. Journal of Sport Psychology. 1985; (7): 205-2.

5) Gilman R. The relationship between life satisfaction, social interests, and the frequency of extracurricular activities among adolescent students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 2001; (20): 749-767.

6) Law M P, Côté J, Ericsson K A. Characteristics of expert development in rhythmic gymnastics. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2007; (5): 82-103.

7) Anshel M H. Sources of disordered eating patterns between ballet dancers and non-dancers. Journal of Sport Behavior. 2004; (27): 115-33.

8) Martens R. Psychological perspectives. In B. R. Cahill, & A. J. Pearl (Eds.), Intensive Participation in Children’s Sports.3thed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1993. P. 9-18.

9) Fraser-Thomas J, Côté J, Deakin J. Understanding dropout and prolonged engagement in adolescent competitive sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2008; (9): 645-62.

10) Dunn J G H, Dunn J C. Goal orientations, perceptions of aggression, and sportspersonship in elite male youth ice hockey players. The Sport Psychologist. 1999; (13): 183- 200.

11) Hansen D M, Larson R. The youth experience survey 2/0: Instrument revisions and validity testing. Unpublished Manuscript. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; 2005. P. 43- 71.

12) Hansen D M, Larson R W. Amplifiers of developmental and negative experiences in organized activities: Dosage, motivation, lead roles, and adultyouth ratios. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. 2007; (28): 360-74.

13) Hansen D M, Larson R W, Dworkin J B. What adolescents learn in organized youth activities: A survey of self-reported developmental experiences. Journal of Research on Adolescence. 2003; (13): 25-55.

14) Larson R W, Hansen D M, Moneta G. Differing profiles of developmental experiences across types of organized youth activities. Developmental Psychology. 2006; (42): 849-63.

15) MacDonald D J, Côté J, Mark J, Deakin J. Psychometric properties of the youth experience survey with young athletes. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2012; (13): 332-40.

16) Hellison D. Teaching personal and social responsibility in physical education. Student learning in physical education: Applying research to enhance instruction. 3thed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2003. P. 241-54.

17) Kashani, V. Farokhi, A. Kazemnejad, A, Shaikh, M. Validity and reliability of the Persian version of sport mental toughness questionnaire (SMTQ). motor behaviour, 2015; 20(7), 15-26.

18) Kline P. Principles and practice of structural equation modelling. 3nd ed. New York: The Guildford Press; 2011. P. 9-64.

19) Meyers L S, Gamst G, Guarino A J. Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation.2thed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc; 2006. P. 77-83.

20) Schutz R W, Gessaroli M E. Use, misuse, and disuse of psychometrics in sport psychology research. In R. N. Singer, M. Murphy, & L. K. Tennant (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Sport Psychology.3thed. New York: Macmillan; 1993. P. 901–17.

21) Terry P C, Lane A M, Fogarty G. Construct validity of the profile of mood states-a for use with adults. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2003; (4): 39- 125.

22) Ziedabadi, R. Rezaei, F., & Motesharee, E. Psychometric Properties and Normalization of Persian Version of Ottawa Mental Skills Assessment Tools (OMSAT-3). The Journal of Psychology studies. 2014; 3(7), pp.63-82.

23) Hashim HA, Zulkifli EZ, Yusof HA. Factorial validation of Malaysian adapted Brunel Mood Scale in an adolescent sample. Asian journal of sports medicine. 2010 Dec 1; 1(4):185.

24) Brown T A. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. 2thed. New York: Guilford Press; 2006. P .66-71.

25) Thomas J R, Nelson J K, Silverman S J. Research methods in physical activity.3thed. Usa: Human Kinetics; 2005. P. 9- 122.

26) Hu L, Bentler P M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. 1999; (6): 1-55.

27) Loewenthal K M. An introduction to psychological tests and scales. 2nd ed. London: UCL Press; 2001. P .51-9.

28) Marsh HW. Application of confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling in sport and exercise psychologsy. 3thed. Handbook of Sport Psychology; 2007: 774-98.

29) Bollen K A. Structural equations with latent variables. 1thed. NY: Wiley; 1989: 21-612.

30) Schinke R J, Hanrahan S J. Cultural sport psychology. 1thed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2009.P.91-219.

31) Nunnally J C, Bernstein I H. The theory of measurement error. Psychometric theory. 3thed. Human Kinetics; 1994. P. 209-247.

ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی و هنجاریابی نسخۀ فارسی پرسش‌نامۀ تجربۀ نوجوانان در ورزش

مراجع

مراجع

دوره 8، شماره 23 - شماره پیاپی 23بهار 1395خرداد 1395صفحه 111-142

دوره 8، شماره 23 - شماره پیاپی 23
بهار 1395
خرداد 1395
صفحه 111-142